Banaras Diary

Why the boatmen of Banaras nearly decided to vote NOTA

The boatmen, farmers and fishermen who live along and on the Ganga have become disillusioned with the frontrunners in the race, despite every candidate paying lip service to their needs.

The battle between the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Congress doesn’t interest Vinod Sahni. He’s interested in a different race altogether, the kind that happens on the Ganga. Chipping away at the wooden skeleton of a new competition boat, the 27 year old dismisses all politicians as members of the mafia — whichever mafia that might be.

“This isn’t your Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai,” Sahni says, never looking away from the rough edge of a newly built hull, which he is slowly smoothing out. “This is UP-Bihar. Here you will have and can only have the mafia.”

Sahni is vice secretary of the Varanasi Nishad Raj Kalyan Samiti, one of several groups that represent the Nishads, a boatman caste who are also called Mallahs. Along with the Binds, who till the land along the Ganga, and the Macchhuaras, the fishermen, the Nishads are the true owners of the great river that is given lip service by every politician who travels through Varanasi.

The BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi said he had decided to contest from here after “Maa Ganga” had called him. The Aam Aadmi Party’s Arvind Kejriwal has made the Ganga a central plank of his manifesto for the constituency. And the Congress’ Ajay Rai, the only local leader among the three in the lead, insists no outsider will be able to understand the spiritual significance that the river has for Varanasi’s residents.

And yet none of the three will be getting the votes of one large chunk of Nisha-Bind-Macchhuara voters, the people whose lives are intricately connected to the river. Two weeks ago, members of the Maa Ganga Nishadraj Sewa Samiti — another organisation that represents the people of the Ganga — realised no one was really listening to their concerns, so they decided to collectively vote NOTA (none of the above).

“They all spoke of Ganga Maiyya, but nobody was willing to come and talk to us,” said "Guru" Vinod Nishad, who founded the organisation. “So we made the decision to press NOTA, and publicised it.”

The problems of the locals from the community all revolve around the river. They are not always allowed to ply their boats without being hassled. Nishad also said Binds and Macchhuaras are regularly picked up by the police if they stray too far away from home. No licences have been handed out for motorboat owners for nearly two decades, because of a stretch of the river considered a wildlife protection zone.

“This is our river. We own it,” said Ajay Nishad, a boatman. “So getting a licence, deciding who can be on the river, this should be in our hands. The people who run the hotels on the Ganga, they are the ones ruining the river, and they are hand-in-glove with the police. The government needs to give power back to the people of and on the river.”

Then there are environmental concerns, starting with the state of the water. Every candidate has mentioned cleaning up the Ganga, yet according to Jhatkaa, an advocacy group, and Varanasi’s Sankat Mochan Foundation, none of the three leading parties have committed to their five-point agenda based on the Ganga Action Plan that was put together in the 1980s.

Despite this, Deepa Gupta, the Executive Director of Jhatkaa, said the increased focus on Varanasi has made her optimistic about chances that there will be some action.

“It’s a huge deal that it has come into the political limelight, which is a good thing,” Gupta said. “ There will be a higher ability for us to hold the government accountable. My actual concern is whether they will take appropriate action… will they implement technology that is appropriate for Indian conditions, and will they be transparent with the way they spend their funds?”

Having said that, Gupta also pointed out the “fight to the bottom” between the BJP and the Congress that had taken place last week, with either side attacking the other over whether they can actually clean the river.

Sahni, the boat-builder, also said keeping the river clean should be the first point of every candidate’s agenda. “The first thing they should just do is ban all plastic from Varanasi,” he said. “You see the state of this river? That’s because of all the plastic that comes into it.”

Oddly enough, one party appears to have been the most active on this front — and it’s not one of the big three in Varanasi. On May 9, three days before the election, the Maa Ganga Nishadraj Sewa Samiti overruled its own decision about voting NOTA and decided to support the Samajwadi Party candidate instead. Nishad said this decision had been taken after the party approached them and promised to take into account all their concerns.

“No one else came to talk to us, except SP,” he said. “Their karyakartas came to our panchayat, and said they will do work for our castes. They said they will help stop the police misbehaviour, they will assist with the licences and improve the river. Whether they win or lose here, they are in the state government and they do have some power to help us. So we have decided to support them.”

The SP’s candidate was one of only two parties, along with the Community Party of India (Marxist), to fully pledge to Jhatkaa’s five-point agenda — although AAP did make positive noises about the programme.

“If they can do the basics for us, that’s all we want,” Nishad said. “What do the people of the Ganga want? To be able to ply our boats, plough our land and catch our fish in peace. That’s all.”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.