Accounting Errors

Why isn't the RBI excited about Modi's financial inclusion scheme?

The central bank warned last week that a faulty rollout could create more problems than it could fix.

Of the few major schemes that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has launched since taking office, the Jan Dhan Yojana for financial inclusion has seemed like them most promising, at least from the headlines. Up to four crore accounts have been opened under the programme, according to the finance ministry, and more than Rs 3,700 crore have been mobilised by banks so far.

But not everybody is as optimistic about the programme. In the last week alone, two officials from the Reserve Bank of India have listed concerns that the government needs to attend to if it aims to ensure that the scheme doesn’t cause more trouble than it will fix.

Why exactly is India’s central bank so concerned about the potential rollout of a programme that could bring so many more people into the banking net?

Hawala smurfing

Many Indians are familiar with hawala accounts and benami transactions, involving informal brokers and fake account-owners. Smurfing, which is also known as structuring, takes this a step further. The strategy involves moving money through various accounts in a certain pattern that will ensure it avoids detection from the authorities. In 2007-'08, the RBI estimated that the hawala market likely covered 30%-40% of the entire market of remittance transfers. The sudden spike in accounts opened, coupled with slightly more relaxed rules on verifying customers, could also mean many more avenues for smurfing, a point made by RBI executive director P Vijay Bhaskar at a seminar last week.

Insurance fraud

One of the key reasons the government is hopeful that this financial inclusions scheme will be more successful than other ones in the past is that they have included various incentives. Everyone who opens one of these bank accounts gets a Rs 5,000 overdraft limit as well as Rs 1 lakh insurance cover. Speaking at the same seminar last week, Bhaskar warned that any attempt to roll out too many accounts without properly implementing Know Your Customer rules could easily lead to people opening accounts in multiple banks to take advantage of the insurance cover.

Dormant accounts

Expanding the number of accounts listed on the sheets of banks across the country could have a hugely beneficial effect on users, particularly in giving them access to cheaper sources of credit while bringing them into the financial network. But if banks end up having to build capacity for huge numbers of accounts that then go dormant, the effort would be wasted.

Already, something like 80% of bank accounts opened by business correspondents, who do the bulk of working in opening new accounts in places where there are no branches, appear to lie dormant. “The system is going to be a waste if what we do generates a whole set of duplicate accounts,” said RBI governor Raghuram Rajan. “It is going to be a waste if you do not have full coverage. It is going to be a waste if those accounts are not used, they open and they languish.”

Scaring away users

This brings Rajan to an even bigger concern: first impressions. There are many reasons that only 35% of India’s adults have bank accounts, and they don’t all have to do with a lack of access. Often, people might not have the documentation to get past Know Your Customer rules or might put more trust in a local cash-based creditor. If they do take the step of getting their documents ready to get a proper bank account, though, Rajan wants to ensure that nothing at all should go wrong.

"Many of the persons who are coming into the system are coming for the first time, so if we don't make a good first impression, they will stay out. Let us ensure it works," he said last week.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.