activist arrested

As Supreme Court stays Setalvad's arrest, here is her response to Gujarat police's charges

The Gujarat police have alleged that Setalvad used organisation funds for wining and dining. She responds.

The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the arrest of activist Teesta Setalvad, her husband Javed Anand and three other office bearers of the Gulberg Society Museum Trust, hours after the Gujarat High Court rejected their anticipatory bail plea. The Supreme Court will now make its final decision on their plea on Friday.

According to reports, officers of the Gujarat Crime Branch had stationed themselves outside Setalvad's Mumbai home soon after the High Court order.

The five have been accused of embezzling funds raised to build a museum to riot victims in Ahmedabad's Gulberg Society, where 69 people were killed during the Gujarat riots of 2002. The high court's decision came a year after a sessions court in Ahmedabad also rejected their anticipatory bail petition.

Last year, Scroll.in investigated the details of the case. Here are some of the charges that the Gujarat Police levelled against them in more recent affidavits, with Setalvad's responses to them.

Ahmedabad Police: Setalvad and Anand transferred Rs 14.2 lakhs from the bank account of their NGO, Citizens for Justice and Peace, to clear their credit card expenses across five years between August 2009 and March 2014. The credit cards were used to buy wine, movie tickets and grocery items, thus showing that they used donor money meant for Gujarat riot victims for personal amusement.

Setalvad and Anand:  Since the organisations that Setalvad and Anand work for do not have their own credit cards, the activists use their personal cards to book air and train tickets for work-related travel. This has been done with the consent of the trustees and auditors of the organisation. These work-related expenses were reimbursed after verifying them.

They have also used their personal credit cards to buy wine, books, shoes, medicines, suitcases, haircuts and restaurant meals, "paid from their independent personal incomes", Setalvad said. However, the Gujarat police "have deliberately manipulated credit card details from the personal accounts of both...[to claim that these were] expenses incurred by them from public money".

She also noted, “Since we live in the State of Maharashtra, and not Gujarat, there is nothing shocking on expenses on wine purchases, grocery, etc” paid for from their personal salaries. Gujarat is the only Indian state with prohibition.

The Rs 14.2 lakhs spread across a period of almost five years works out to an average of Rs 25,000 per month. Given that their work requires them to travel frequently between Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and New Delhi, this is a reasonable figure.

Ahmedabad Police: Lakhs of rupees were transferred from the NGO's account to the personal accounts of Setalvad and Anand and even their daughter Tamara, for several years.

Setalvad and Anand:  It's their monthly salary, Rs 48,000 each. Their daughter  received Rs 7,500 per month for her work in documenting and disseminating information.

Ahmedabad Police: They run several institutions from the same office but show different office expenses for each institution.

Setalvad and Anand: The offices of Sabrang Trust and Citizens for Justice and Peace and one more organisation operated from the same premises. The three organisations had three different and separate office spaces within the same area, different office equipments and staff, "both administrative and technical/project staff”. Hence the separate office expenses.

Ahmedabad Police: Setalvad has not submitted any corroboratory documents to the court along with her affidavit, and that her affidavits were mere diversionary tactics. Setalvad and Anand did not cooperate with the investigation and their anticipatory bail plea should be rejected so they could be interrogated in custody.

Setalvad and Anand: We've given the police all the documents they asked for.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.