Opinion

The petroleum ministry document leak: hype, lies and CCTV footage

The drama playing out on TV screens may be rooted in facts, but it has much to do with an image-makeover, and less with arresting criminals.

It is a sham. It is merely an exaggerated drama playing out on TV screens whose real purpose is political posturing and image-makeover, and not to arrest criminals. The arrest of five people, including two from the petroleum ministry, and interrogation of a dozen more in the Great Document Leak are about hype and partial lies, based on CCTV footage.

The timing of the police action and the media circus that followed raise eyebrows. Is the government serious about cleaning up its act to ensure secrecy of its decisions? Are there other factors that worked in this case, in which, as is being claimed, documents from the petroleum ministry were routinely and clandestinely photocopied by a gang of four people, and sold to corporate houses and consultancy firms?

Going by the evidence, the latter may be true. This is not to deny that the theatrics are not rooted in any facts. No one denies that the petroleum ministry had gaping holes through which documents were leaked to businessmen, middlemen, lobbyists, consultants and, of course, the media.

The RIL connection

Paranjoy Guha Thakurta’s book, Gas Wars: Crony Capitalism and the Ambanis, and allegations hurled by the Aam Admi Party (AAP) against Reliance Industries Ltd, an oil and gas major, were based on such leaks. Both claimed they had documents to prove that the Mukesh Ambani-owned RIL was favoured by past governments to earn whopping profits, either through high natural gas price or partial sale of gas assets.

However, the rationale behind this episode, and the manner in which it is being played up, is to send political and other signals to several stakeholders. The overarching idea is to make Narendra Modi, the prime minister, a hero among Indian and foreign investors.

In the past few months, his image has taken a dip: even insiders within the BJP and Sangh Parivar contend that Modi speaks well, but lacks action. Therefore, the prime minister wanted to do something to convince critics that his government works better than the previous ones.

First, its aim is to hit back at RIL to boost Modi’s image. For the past few years, the elder Ambani brother has found himself on the back foot for several reasons. The first was the campaign against him by petroleum ministers (Jaipal Reddy), politicians (Arvind Kejriwal), former bureaucrats (EAS Sarma), lawyers (Prashant Bhushan) and journalists (Thakurta) on the issue of gas price.

RIL lobbied UPA-II (previous regime) to double the domestic price from $4.2 a unit to $8.4. The Election Commission kept the order in abeyance because of the 2014 national elections. When Modi came to power, it was felt that he will play ball because of his proximity to Ambani. But the price was increased to only $5.6, and was a huge blow to RIL’s business plan and financials.

Another point of contention between Modi and Ambani is about the arbitration case, which relates to RIL’s offshore gas assets (KG-D6) in the Krishna-Godavari basin, off the coast of Andhra Pradesh. Here too, the events went contrary to Ambani’s expectations. NDA-II continued to claim that the previous regime was correct when it disallowed $2.3 billion to RIL because of lower gas production.

Strong signals

Through both these decisions, Modi sent signals to his critics that he wasn’t close to the Ambani Group, as alleged. But these did not work since millions of viewers saw the two Ambani brothers, along with other industrialists, cosy up to Modi in Gujarat. Media wrote pieces that Gautam Adani of the Adani Group has earned huge largesse from this government.

The document leak case, which named RIL, will send a stronger signal that while Modi is pro-industry, he is not pro-certain business groups like Ambani or Adani. Modi was also unhappy that contrary to his diktat, sensitive documents related to the KG-D6 arbitration case and other ministerial decisions reached the RIL and other corporate offices before they made it to his office.

However, the decisions will anger the senior Ambani as they will create further rifts with his foreign partner, BP (formerly British Petroleum), which has a 30 per cent stake in the former’s gas assets. A few days ago, BP said it will reduce the value of its share in RIL’s gas assets by $830 million.

Ironically, the day the Delhi Police made the arrests public RIL announced that it had appointed Maheshwar Sahu, a former IAS officer from Gujarat, as an independent director. Sahu is a Modi loyalist and handled the latter’s pet projects like ‘Vibrant Gujarat’ summits.

The names of energy companies like the Essar Group and Cairns India are included in the present case to prepare grounds for the next round of auction of oil and gas blocks in India. Modi hopes to showcase the much-delayed, but forthcoming, auction – NELP X (Tenth round under the New Exploration Licensing Policy) – as another feather in his cap, just like the coal block and spectrum auctions.

The case aims to convince the foreign oil conglomerates that Modi is serious in his efforts to inculcate transparency and clean up governance. Unlike the previous NELP auctions, the investors are likely to enthusiastically participate in NELP X. The successes of coal, oil and gas, and spectrum auctions will boost official revenues and establish Modi as a leader who makes things happen.

This is critical because Modi has little room to manoeuvre on the financial front. His finance minister needs revenues to control the fiscal deficit. If the natural resources auctions fail, the government will be caught in a trap, and all hopes for higher economic growth will vanish. This will force the masses to dub Modi as a failure, which is something he cannot digest.

The fall guy

Santanu Saikia, who was questioned by the police, is the fall guy. He runs an energy portal, www.indianpetro.com, and allegedly indulges in buying the ministry’s documents to grab corporate subscriptions for his website. Several years ago, he asked this journalist to join his group, and explained the job entailed writing short pieces from such documents.

His business model apparently involved selling many of these documents to his corporate clients, who included the large state-owned and smaller private energy companies. The flow of documents to the latter will stop. Thus, even the state entities will be starved of information related to the Centre’s decisions.

After this case, the bureaucrats will be cagey to dole out documents to their favourites in the oil and gas sector, including lobbyists and consultants. Other ministries will get the message that they could be arrested if they indulged in similar practices.

In a single swoop, Modi hopes to plug information holes in his government. He wants to cut off the information flow from the various ministries to either state-owned, Indian private or foreign firms. This is the beginning of a new era of transparency, in which information and decision-making is centralised, and external middlemen and lobbyists are marginalised. In such a scenario, all roads will lead to 7, Race Course Road, and business houses will be forced to line outside Modi’s office.

Alam Srinivas is Consulting Editor, Tehelka, and author of the book, Storms in the Sea Wind: Ambani versus Ambani.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.