note demonetisation

RSS has endorsed demonetisation, but is in a bind over the impact on its financial backers

Small traders, the organisation's core support base, have been hit hard by the government's decision.

Despite its endorsement of the government’s demonetisation decision, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh finds itself in a bind. While the move has evoked massive support among its cadre, it has left its financial backers – traders and small businessmen – gasping for breath.

For almost a fortnight now, the RSS has been trying to look for ways to strike a balance between the enthusiasm of its cadre and the fury of its backers. It finally broke its silence on Thursday, when it issued a statement calling Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s decision “a noble endeavour” and asking the “patriotic people of Bharat” to cooperate with the government, “irrespective of the temporary but unavoidable inconvenience being caused”.

Yet, the confusion within the RSS – the ideological parent of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party – was so intense that it took a clear two days for it to complete the process of issuing the statement. According to those in the know, the statement was prepared on Tuesday, the day an emotional Modi defended his government’s decision during a meeting of the BJP’s parliamentary party. However, the release of the statement was delayed as a section of RSS office-bearers were in favour of moving cautiously, so as not to hurt the sentiments of small businessmen reeling under the impact of the withdrawal of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes.

Perhaps as a result of this nervousness, the RSS forgot to change the date of the statement that was issued by its prachar pramukh Manmohan Vaidya. “It is because of this reason that the statement issued on November 24 carried the date of November 22,” said a senior RSS office-bearer.

Big blow to traders 

Traders and small businessmen have traditionally formed the core support base of the RSS, helping it financially while also providing a regular supply of cadre.

The November 8 demonetisation decision has hit cash-based retail businesses in India hard. A week after the decision, the Confederation of All India Traders, one of the country’s largest trade associations, announced that businesses “in markets across the country” had “reduced to 25%”.

Many in the RSS fear that unless the government immediately gives traders and small businessmen some tangible relief, their relationship with the Sangh could chill.

The organisation is aware of the vitality of its bond with the trading community. This is perhaps why the RSS, which generally refrains from speaking in public on the government’s policy decisions, has consistently maintained that the country should not open its doors to foreign direct investment in the retail sector. In May 2015, when the Modi government decided to allow foreign retailers a 51% stake in multi-brand retail stores, the RSS not only criticised the move openly but went to the extent of registering its protest with Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh.

“Patriotism is all fine,” said an RSS office-bearer who is himself a small businessman. “Most of the traders and small businessmen are severely hit by the manner demonetisation has been done. They cannot live by patriotism alone. They have to run their families too.”

That, however, is just one side of the story. For, the government’s decision is said to have gone down unusually well with RSS cadre across the country, particularly in poll-bound Uttar Pradesh.

“The decision has all the support from our cadre,” said a senior RSS leader who did not want to be identified. “They think the present hardships are ephemeral and that it would hurt only those sitting on large amounts of cash. They have a point, but this could have been done without hurting the trading community.”

He added, “If you ask me how it would affect the Sangh, I would simply say that we all are clueless. We have to wait, just as everyone else is waiting.”

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.