note demonetisation

Cauliflower sells for Rs one a kilo in one Bihar market as demonetisation depresses demand

Buyers are cutting back on consumption, traders are losing margins, and farmers are paying their workers in kind.

At first glance, it looks like any other day at the mandi in Bettiah.

Trucks stand next to the concrete arch that leads into the fruit and vegetable market in this small town in northern Bihar. Inside the mandi samiti, as the precinct is called, hawkers sit with baskets bursting with vegetables. The shops seem well-stocked.

But the abnormality shows up when you ask traders and hawkers about the impact of the government’s decision to demonetise Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes. Vegetable prices have collapsed, they say.

Cauliflower or phool gobhi, said Mahfooz Alam, a wholesaler at the mandi, was selling for Rs 12 a kilo just before the announcement on November 8. “It is now selling for one or two rupees.”

The prices began to fall within 2-3 days of the Prime Minister’s announcement on November 8, said Muhammad Islam, a fruit trader.

Baingan (aubergine) fell from Rs 15 per kilo to Rs 2-Rs 3. Patta gobhi (lettuce) has slumped from Rs 15 per kilo to Rs 5. And saag (spinach) has dropped from Rs 10 to Rs 2.50 per kilo.

These are jaw-dropping falls. What explains them?

What the buyers say

Kanhaiya Das is in his mid-thirties and lives in Purvi Kargahiya, a village on the outskirts of Bettiah.

Since his family has no farmland, he works as a raj mistry, or construction supervisor, in the town. So do most others in his family.

How has the government’s decision affected them? The family has run out of cash. The raj mistris have not found work for the last 20 days.

“We used to earn anywhere between Rs 280-Rs 360 a day. But since the government’s decision, my thekedaar (contractor) has not provided us with any work,” Das said.

Where work is available, contractors or home owners want to pay with Rs 500 or Rs 1000 notes – bills that workers like him are unwilling to take. “We will have to stand in a queue for two days to deposit that money,” he said.

The alternative is to give those notes to a sahukar (moneylender) who will give them Rs 450 for every Rs 500 note. That is again a bad option. As Das said, “Usme hamara nuksan hain.” We stand to lose in such a transaction.

What is complicating matters is that the family is unable to access its savings in the bank. The Madhya Bihar Grameen Bank, or the regional rural bank where Das’ family has an account, is not letting villagers withdraw more than Rs 1,000-Rs 2,000 at a time, and that too not more than once a week.

The bank has its own compulsions, said a cashier. Grameen banks are not independent entities. They have been clustered under larger, nationalised banks. “Our sponsor bank is Punjab National Bank,” said the cashier. “They are supposed to collect money from the Reserve Bank and pass our share down to us.” But Punjab National Bank, he claimed, is sending most of the money to its branches and sending very little to them.

Effectively, he said, for every Rs 15 lakh-20 lakh that the bank needs, it gets just Rs three lakh. When people come to withdraw, say, Rs 10,000, the bank gives them much less since it had to spread its cash among as many households as possible.

The fallout is that families in Bettiah are unable to withdraw more than Rs 1,000 a week to meet their expenses, which range from buying food and medicines to purchasing farm inputs for the coming season or stocks for their shops.

“Majboori ke daayre se guzar rahein hain,” said Das. We are travelling through difficult times.

If things get worse, he said, families will have to cut back on expenses to stretch their cash longer. “Teen time khatey hain, ek time khayengey.” Instead of three meals a day, we will eat once.

Kanhaiya Das has no work to do. Photo by M Rajshekhar.
Kanhaiya Das has no work to do. Photo by M Rajshekhar.

What the traders say

This explains why prices are plummeting at the fruit and vegetable market in Bettiah.

“Grahaks [buyers] are buying less,” said Mohammad Islam, the fruit trader. “And so, rates have fallen in the mandi.”

There is further nuance here. Bettiah is a small mandi. There are no large towns in the vicinity that the traders can supply to. All it does, said Das, is meet the demand for vegetables in a radius of 25 km. When those customers began buying less, the rates fell almost immediately as the mandi tried to balance supply and demand.

As it travels from farms to plates, India’s agricultural produce changes hands several times. In this part of Bihar, farmers either sell their produce to village-level aggregators, or bring it to the mandi and sell it to wholesale traders who market the produce to hawkers. The hawkers, in turn, sell the produce to customers.

Each intermediary tags on a small margin before selling to the next rung. For instance, an arhatiya, or commission agent who markets farmers’ produce to traders at the mandi, charges 1% as commission. When farmers were selling cauliflower at Rs 20 per kilo, he made 20 paise per kilo.

But now, when customers began buying less and mandi prices collapsed, the margins of every intermediary in this chain fell. The arhatiya, for instance, now make just 1 paise for every kilo of cauliflower sold. Complicating matters, with their cash stuck in banks or in unusable notes, they are suffering the same cash shortage as Das.

It is the same story for the hawkers. Incomes have fallen steeply, said Mohammad Ahsan, an old man with a white beard, who sells potatoes and onions at the mandi. Potatoes, selling at Rs 10 per kilo before November 8, are now retailing at Rs 6 per kilo.

Fruit sellers have been hit harder, since even the families who continued to buy vegetables, have cut back on fruits. Islam has temporarily shuttered his business. “We used to get apples from Delhi and Kashmir, and pomengranate from Nasik,” he said. In both, he liquidated his stocks and stopped placing new orders. “We had one truck filled with bananas worth Rs one lakh. We had to throw that away when we could not sell it.”

As demand fell, traders have dropped the prices at which they buy and sell.

What has this meant for farmers?

What the farmers say

The worst affected in all this are the farmers. They had made their investments at the start of the kharif or monsoon cropping season, thinking the market would behave like it did every other year.

Landholdings in northern Bihar are smaller than in the south of the state. Further, most farmers are sharecroppers – they cultivate land on rent, which they pay either as cash or as a share of the produce.

In all, incomes are low. Take Binay Paswan, a farmer who lives in Barwat, another village on the outskirts of Bettiah. His farm income is about Rs 24,000-Rs 25,000. Half of this comes from vegetables and the rest from wheat and rice.

At the time the government announced the currency swap decision, farmers like him were just finishing the harvest of paddy and vegetables. The cash crunch has meant they are holding on to the paddy harvest, planning to sell it later. “We do not want to be paid in Rs 500 or Rs 1,000 notes,” Paswan said.

Binay Paswan is holding on to his paddy harvest. Photo by M Rajshekhar.
Binay Paswan is holding on to his paddy harvest. Photo by M Rajshekhar.

But vegetables are far more perishable and need to be sold quickly. Complicating matters, this year’s harvest is better than last year.

All this has resulted in large losses for farmers. Said Zubair Ali, a farmer near Bettiah, “We need at least Rs 10 a kilo to recover our investments in the crop. But now, we are not getting more than Rs 2.50 a kilo.”

Farmers are responding to this drop in prices in varied ways.

In the hope of finding better prices, Ali and some other farmers from his village took their produce to the mandi at Narkatiyaganj, about 40 km away. They found the price of cauliflower in the mandi was barely a shade better than Bettiah – Rs 2.50 per kilo.

Other farmers are planning to dry the cauliflower stock, keep it at home and gradually sell it to fellow villagers. Strapped for cash, some farmers are paying their workers in kind.

When the rates are high, said a farmer at Barwat, they usually keep nothing for the village. “This year, we will probably keep four out of every ten sacks for the village.”

Little of this, however, helps farmers with the most urgent problem they face – planting the rabi crop. Paswan, for instance, is planning to sow wheat, bhindi (ladies finger), baingan (aubergine) and lauki (gourd). With little income from the kharif harvest, he will have to borrow money. Banks do not lend to small farmers and the local rate of interest will be five percent, he said. Given the cost of the loan and the cash crunch, he will probably plant the rabi crop on only half of his ten kattas of land.

The big picture

Put it all together and you see how demonetisation – both the idea and its execution – has affected India’s agricultural marketing chain in this relatively remote part of the country.

On Saturday, when this reporter met him, Alam was sitting on a wooden stall at the Bettiah mandi. A sheet of paper stuck on the wall in front of him stated: “We do not accept old Rs 500 or Rs 1,000 notes.”

Said Alam, “Yeh all India ki kahaani hain, Bihar hi ki nahin.” This is the story of all India, not just Bihar.

Indeed, as the country enters its third week of demonetisation, India’s mandis are painting a complex picture. In Patna, ten days after demonetisation, it felt like the mandi had frozen. Three weeks later, news coming in from other parts of the country indicates both arrivals and prices are starting to fall.

Take Maharashtra. In Shaha, a large, relatively prosperous village in Washim district’s Karanja taluka, soyabean harvesting is almost done, but the produce has been stuck at the market. Soyabean rates were already half of what they were last year, even before the demonetisation announcement. They have been depressed further since.

Said Namdevrao Hingle, a farmer from near Washim town, “Soyabean is selling at the rate it was ten years ago.”

The accompanying changes – for farmers and their workers – have been predictable. In parts of Maharashtra, farmers have begun to give grains to their labourers in lieu of cash payments. “We have to harvest our soyabean now before it gets too late,” said Bharat Pawar, a resident of Kisan Nagar in Washim’s Karanja taluka. “As far as possible, we are harvesting within the family. The labourers we employ, we are paying with food and whatever notes we have.”

With inputs from Mridula Chari in Washim, Maharashtra.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

How sustainable farming practices can secure India's food for the future

India is home to 15% of the world’s undernourished population.

Food security is a pressing problem in India and in the world. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), it is estimated that over 190 million people go hungry every day in the country.

Evidence for India’s food challenge can be found in the fact that the yield per hectare of rice, one of India’s principal crops, is 2177 kgs per hectare, lagging behind countries such as China and Brazil that have yield rates of 4263 kgs/hectare and 3265 kgs/hectare respectively. The cereal yield per hectare in the country is also 2,981 kgs per hectare, lagging far behind countries such as China, Japan and the US.

The slow growth of agricultural production in India can be attributed to an inefficient rural transport system, lack of awareness about the treatment of crops, limited access to modern farming technology and the shrinking agricultural land due to urbanization. Add to that, an irregular monsoon and the fact that 63% of agricultural land is dependent on rainfall further increase the difficulties we face.

Despite these odds, there is huge potential for India to increase its agricultural productivity to meet the food requirements of its growing population.

The good news is that experience in India and other countries shows that the adoption of sustainable farming practices can increase both productivity and reduce ecological harm.

Sustainable agriculture techniques enable higher resource efficiency – they help produce greater agricultural output while using lesser land, water and energy, ensuring profitability for the farmer. These essentially include methods that, among other things, protect and enhance the crops and the soil, improve water absorption and use efficient seed treatments. While Indian farmers have traditionally followed these principles, new technology now makes them more effective.

For example, for soil enhancement, certified biodegradable mulch films are now available. A mulch film is a layer of protective material applied to soil to conserve moisture and fertility. Most mulch films used in agriculture today are made of polyethylene (PE), which has the unwanted overhead of disposal. It is a labour intensive and time-consuming process to remove the PE mulch film after usage. If not done, it affects soil quality and hence, crop yield. An independently certified biodegradable mulch film, on the other hand, is directly absorbed by the microorganisms in the soil. It conserves the soil properties, eliminates soil contamination, and saves the labor cost that comes with PE mulch films.

The other perpetual challenge for India’s farms is the availability of water. Many food crops like rice and sugarcane have a high-water requirement. In a country like India, where majority of the agricultural land is rain-fed, low rainfall years can wreak havoc for crops and cause a slew of other problems - a surge in crop prices and a reduction in access to essential food items. Again, Indian farmers have long experience in water conservation that can now be enhanced through technology.

Seeds can now be treated with enhancements that help them improve their root systems. This leads to more efficient water absorption.

In addition to soil and water management, the third big factor, better seed treatment, can also significantly improve crop health and boost productivity. These solutions include application of fungicides and insecticides that protect the seed from unwanted fungi and parasites that can damage crops or hinder growth, and increase productivity.

While sustainable agriculture through soil, water and seed management can increase crop yields, an efficient warehousing and distribution system is also necessary to ensure that the output reaches the consumers. According to a study by CIPHET, Indian government’s harvest-research body, up to 67 million tons of food get wasted every year — a quantity equivalent to that consumed by the entire state of Bihar in a year. Perishables, such as fruits and vegetables, end up rotting in store houses or during transportation due to pests, erratic weather and the lack of modern storage facilities. In fact, simply bringing down food wastage and increasing the efficiency in distribution alone can significantly help improve food security. Innovations such as special tarpaulins, that keep perishables cool during transit, and more efficient insulation solutions can reduce rotting and reduce energy usage in cold storage.

Thus, all three aspects — production, storage, and distribution — need to be optimized if India is to feed its ever-growing population.

One company working to drive increased sustainability down the entire agriculture value chain is BASF. For example, the company offers cutting edge seed treatments that protect crops from disease and provide plant health benefits such as enhanced vitality and better tolerance for stress and cold. In addition, BASF has developed a biodegradable mulch film from its ecovio® bioplastic that is certified compostable – meaning farmers can reap the benefits of better soil without risk of contamination or increased labor costs. These and more of the company’s innovations are helping farmers in India achieve higher and more sustainable yields.

Of course, products are only one part of the solution. The company also recognizes the importance of training farmers in sustainable farming practices and in the safe use of its products. To this end, BASF engaged in a widespread farmer outreach program called Samruddhi from 2007 to 2014. Their ‘Suraksha Hamesha’ (safety always) program reached over 23,000 farmers and 4,000 spray men across India in 2016 alone. In addition to training, the company also offers a ‘Sanrakshan® Kit’ to farmers that includes personal protection tools and equipment. All these efforts serve to spread awareness about the sustainable and responsible use of crop protection products – ensuring that farmers stay safe while producing good quality food.

Interested in learning more about BASF’s work in sustainable agriculture? See here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.