note demonetisation

Amended tax laws are as poorly conceptualised as demonetisation – and may even be unconstitutional

According to the Constitution, all income tax must be divided between the Centre and the state.

The Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Bill, 2016, passed by the Lok Sabha on Tuesday with no debate, increases the penalty on those with undeclared income but also provides for the second amnesty scheme for them this year. This is something of a climbdown by a government that had, just three weeks ago, demonetised Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes ostensibly to crack down on the black money economy and promised stern action against those who hoard unaccounted-for cash.

The amendment Bill, which was tabled in the Lok Sabha on Monday, increases the tax on “unexplained income” from the present flat rate of 30% (plus surcharge and cess) to 60%( plus surcharge and cess) under the Income Tax Act. If such undisclosed income comes to light in a raid, it will attract a penalty of 30%, in addition to the tax payable, if the person admits to the undisclosed income and returns it. If the person does not cooperate during the raid, the penalty is increased to 60%. Theoretically, undisclosed income, under the proposed amendments, can be taxed up to 90% (plus surcharge and cess). This comes just months after the previous Income Declaration Scheme, which ended on September 30, gave people a four-month window to declare their undisclosed income and pay a 45% tax and penalty, with no questions asked.

This is the stick. The carrot, however, lies in Chapter IX-A, inserted into the Finance Act 2016, which introduces the “Taxation and Investment Regime for Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016”. This is essentially an amnesty scheme for undisclosed income. Under this “regime”, if those with undisclosed income come forward to declare it, they need to pay just about 50% of it to the Government (30% tax + 10% surcharge + 10% penalty) in exchange for immunity from further income tax proceedings on this income.

In addition to this, the declarant is also mandatorily required to deposit 25% of the undisclosed income in the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme, 2016 – an interest-free deposit with a lock-in period of four years.

The legality of this move, however, is doubtful.

What the Constitution says

Article 266 of the Constitution of India mandates that all taxes and other revenue of the Government of India must go the Consolidated Fund of India, and likewise, all the revenue of the state governments should go to the Consolidated Fund of the State. With regard to income tax specifically, revenue raised by the Union government is to be shared with the state governments based on the formula and method prescribed by the Finance Commission in accordance with Article 270.

By ordaining that those who voluntarily declare their hitherto-undisclosed incomes should pay 25% of that money to the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, the Bill effectively imposes an income tax which is not payable to the Consolidated Fund of India but to a specified scheme whose use and ultimate purpose are still unclear. Nor is this money allocated to the states in accordance with Article 270. In effect, the Centre has imposed an income tax that it will refuse to share with the states as it is required to under the Constitution.

A new tax

But can the payment to the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana be called a tax?

The legal definition of a tax was well established by the Supreme Court in the 1950s. It is therefore no longer disputed that the two distinguishing features of a tax are that it is compulsory and there is no quid pro quo in the payment. A compulsory deposit with the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana , on which the depositor does not even receive an interest and is locked in for a period of four years, is quite clearly a tax, (albeit refundable after four years, if so required) that is being levied on the person who makes a voluntary disclosure about undisclosed income. Given that no specific purpose is mentioned for the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana in the Bill, it cannot even be considered a cess. It is therefore a tax that the Central Government seeks to levy, contrary to the Constitutional scheme for collecting taxes.

As with the ever-increasing use of cesses by the Central Government, this scheme suggests that the Central Government does not seriously believe in cooperative federalism, where the Centre and state work together. Because, unlike taxes, the Centre is not required by the Constitution to share the proceeds from a cess to government. However, the Centre has used some of these, such as the Swachh Bharat Cess and the Primary Education Cess, to direct programmes and spending in areas which are within the domain of the state under the Constitution, such as public health, sanitation and education. The Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana seems to be yet another move to undermine the powers and autonomy of states guaranteed under the Constitution.

For all the blatant disrespect of Parliamentary procedure and the Constitution in passing this Bill, as far as black money amnesty schemes go, it is hard to see this one (which makes the declarant pay 75% of the money disclosed up front, if you take the 25% deposit in the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana into account) as being particularly attractive to the tax evader. Far from providing any real incentive to come forward and declare the money, it is likely to make those with black money sit back and take their chances with an income tax raid, using the time to find better ways to hide or launder their stash. As with the demonetisation of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes, this Bill too does not seem to have been entirely thought through, and is of doubtful legality in the margins.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

How sustainable farming practices can secure India's food for the future

India is home to 15% of the world’s undernourished population.

Food security is a pressing problem in India and in the world. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), it is estimated that over 190 million people go hungry every day in the country.

Evidence for India’s food challenge can be found in the fact that the yield per hectare of rice, one of India’s principal crops, is 2177 kgs per hectare, lagging behind countries such as China and Brazil that have yield rates of 4263 kgs/hectare and 3265 kgs/hectare respectively. The cereal yield per hectare in the country is also 2,981 kgs per hectare, lagging far behind countries such as China, Japan and the US.

The slow growth of agricultural production in India can be attributed to an inefficient rural transport system, lack of awareness about the treatment of crops, limited access to modern farming technology and the shrinking agricultural land due to urbanization. Add to that, an irregular monsoon and the fact that 63% of agricultural land is dependent on rainfall further increase the difficulties we face.

Despite these odds, there is huge potential for India to increase its agricultural productivity to meet the food requirements of its growing population.

The good news is that experience in India and other countries shows that the adoption of sustainable farming practices can increase both productivity and reduce ecological harm.

Sustainable agriculture techniques enable higher resource efficiency – they help produce greater agricultural output while using lesser land, water and energy, ensuring profitability for the farmer. These essentially include methods that, among other things, protect and enhance the crops and the soil, improve water absorption and use efficient seed treatments. While Indian farmers have traditionally followed these principles, new technology now makes them more effective.

For example, for soil enhancement, certified biodegradable mulch films are now available. A mulch film is a layer of protective material applied to soil to conserve moisture and fertility. Most mulch films used in agriculture today are made of polyethylene (PE), which has the unwanted overhead of disposal. It is a labour intensive and time-consuming process to remove the PE mulch film after usage. If not done, it affects soil quality and hence, crop yield. An independently certified biodegradable mulch film, on the other hand, is directly absorbed by the microorganisms in the soil. It conserves the soil properties, eliminates soil contamination, and saves the labor cost that comes with PE mulch films.

The other perpetual challenge for India’s farms is the availability of water. Many food crops like rice and sugarcane have a high-water requirement. In a country like India, where majority of the agricultural land is rain-fed, low rainfall years can wreak havoc for crops and cause a slew of other problems - a surge in crop prices and a reduction in access to essential food items. Again, Indian farmers have long experience in water conservation that can now be enhanced through technology.

Seeds can now be treated with enhancements that help them improve their root systems. This leads to more efficient water absorption.

In addition to soil and water management, the third big factor, better seed treatment, can also significantly improve crop health and boost productivity. These solutions include application of fungicides and insecticides that protect the seed from unwanted fungi and parasites that can damage crops or hinder growth, and increase productivity.

While sustainable agriculture through soil, water and seed management can increase crop yields, an efficient warehousing and distribution system is also necessary to ensure that the output reaches the consumers. According to a study by CIPHET, Indian government’s harvest-research body, up to 67 million tons of food get wasted every year — a quantity equivalent to that consumed by the entire state of Bihar in a year. Perishables, such as fruits and vegetables, end up rotting in store houses or during transportation due to pests, erratic weather and the lack of modern storage facilities. In fact, simply bringing down food wastage and increasing the efficiency in distribution alone can significantly help improve food security. Innovations such as special tarpaulins, that keep perishables cool during transit, and more efficient insulation solutions can reduce rotting and reduce energy usage in cold storage.

Thus, all three aspects — production, storage, and distribution — need to be optimized if India is to feed its ever-growing population.

One company working to drive increased sustainability down the entire agriculture value chain is BASF. For example, the company offers cutting edge seed treatments that protect crops from disease and provide plant health benefits such as enhanced vitality and better tolerance for stress and cold. In addition, BASF has developed a biodegradable mulch film from its ecovio® bioplastic that is certified compostable – meaning farmers can reap the benefits of better soil without risk of contamination or increased labor costs. These and more of the company’s innovations are helping farmers in India achieve higher and more sustainable yields.

Of course, products are only one part of the solution. The company also recognizes the importance of training farmers in sustainable farming practices and in the safe use of its products. To this end, BASF engaged in a widespread farmer outreach program called Samruddhi from 2007 to 2014. Their ‘Suraksha Hamesha’ (safety always) program reached over 23,000 farmers and 4,000 spray men across India in 2016 alone. In addition to training, the company also offers a ‘Sanrakshan® Kit’ to farmers that includes personal protection tools and equipment. All these efforts serve to spread awareness about the sustainable and responsible use of crop protection products – ensuring that farmers stay safe while producing good quality food.

Interested in learning more about BASF’s work in sustainable agriculture? See here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.