Title

× Close
note demonetisation

Amended tax laws are as poorly conceptualised as demonetisation – and may even be unconstitutional

According to the Constitution, all income tax must be divided between the Centre and the state.

The Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Bill, 2016, passed by the Lok Sabha on Tuesday with no debate, increases the penalty on those with undeclared income but also provides for the second amnesty scheme for them this year. This is something of a climbdown by a government that had, just three weeks ago, demonetised Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes ostensibly to crack down on the black money economy and promised stern action against those who hoard unaccounted-for cash.

The amendment Bill, which was tabled in the Lok Sabha on Monday, increases the tax on “unexplained income” from the present flat rate of 30% (plus surcharge and cess) to 60%( plus surcharge and cess) under the Income Tax Act. If such undisclosed income comes to light in a raid, it will attract a penalty of 30%, in addition to the tax payable, if the person admits to the undisclosed income and returns it. If the person does not cooperate during the raid, the penalty is increased to 60%. Theoretically, undisclosed income, under the proposed amendments, can be taxed up to 90% (plus surcharge and cess). This comes just months after the previous Income Declaration Scheme, which ended on September 30, gave people a four-month window to declare their undisclosed income and pay a 45% tax and penalty, with no questions asked.

This is the stick. The carrot, however, lies in Chapter IX-A, inserted into the Finance Act 2016, which introduces the “Taxation and Investment Regime for Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, 2016”. This is essentially an amnesty scheme for undisclosed income. Under this “regime”, if those with undisclosed income come forward to declare it, they need to pay just about 50% of it to the Government (30% tax + 10% surcharge + 10% penalty) in exchange for immunity from further income tax proceedings on this income.

In addition to this, the declarant is also mandatorily required to deposit 25% of the undisclosed income in the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Deposit Scheme, 2016 – an interest-free deposit with a lock-in period of four years.

The legality of this move, however, is doubtful.

What the Constitution says

Article 266 of the Constitution of India mandates that all taxes and other revenue of the Government of India must go the Consolidated Fund of India, and likewise, all the revenue of the state governments should go to the Consolidated Fund of the State. With regard to income tax specifically, revenue raised by the Union government is to be shared with the state governments based on the formula and method prescribed by the Finance Commission in accordance with Article 270.

By ordaining that those who voluntarily declare their hitherto-undisclosed incomes should pay 25% of that money to the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana, the Bill effectively imposes an income tax which is not payable to the Consolidated Fund of India but to a specified scheme whose use and ultimate purpose are still unclear. Nor is this money allocated to the states in accordance with Article 270. In effect, the Centre has imposed an income tax that it will refuse to share with the states as it is required to under the Constitution.

A new tax

But can the payment to the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana be called a tax?

The legal definition of a tax was well established by the Supreme Court in the 1950s. It is therefore no longer disputed that the two distinguishing features of a tax are that it is compulsory and there is no quid pro quo in the payment. A compulsory deposit with the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana , on which the depositor does not even receive an interest and is locked in for a period of four years, is quite clearly a tax, (albeit refundable after four years, if so required) that is being levied on the person who makes a voluntary disclosure about undisclosed income. Given that no specific purpose is mentioned for the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana in the Bill, it cannot even be considered a cess. It is therefore a tax that the Central Government seeks to levy, contrary to the Constitutional scheme for collecting taxes.

As with the ever-increasing use of cesses by the Central Government, this scheme suggests that the Central Government does not seriously believe in cooperative federalism, where the Centre and state work together. Because, unlike taxes, the Centre is not required by the Constitution to share the proceeds from a cess to government. However, the Centre has used some of these, such as the Swachh Bharat Cess and the Primary Education Cess, to direct programmes and spending in areas which are within the domain of the state under the Constitution, such as public health, sanitation and education. The Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana seems to be yet another move to undermine the powers and autonomy of states guaranteed under the Constitution.

For all the blatant disrespect of Parliamentary procedure and the Constitution in passing this Bill, as far as black money amnesty schemes go, it is hard to see this one (which makes the declarant pay 75% of the money disclosed up front, if you take the 25% deposit in the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana into account) as being particularly attractive to the tax evader. Far from providing any real incentive to come forward and declare the money, it is likely to make those with black money sit back and take their chances with an income tax raid, using the time to find better ways to hide or launder their stash. As with the demonetisation of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes, this Bill too does not seem to have been entirely thought through, and is of doubtful legality in the margins.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BULLETIN BY 

Making transportation more sustainable even with fuel-based automobiles

These innovations can reduce the pollution caused by vehicles.

According to the WHO’s Ambient Air Pollution Database released in 2016, ten of the twenty most polluted cities in the world are in India, with Gwalior and Ahmedabad occupying the second and third positions. Pollution levels are usually expressed in the levels of particulate matter (PM) in the air. This refers to microscopic matter that is a mixture of smoke, metals, chemicals and dust suspended in the atmosphere that can affect human health. Particulate matter is easily inhaled, and can cause allergies and diseases such as asthma, lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Indian cities have some of the highest levels of PM10 (particles smaller than 10 micrometres in diameter) and PM2.5 particles (particles smaller than 2.5 micrometres in diameter). The finer the particulate matter, the deeper into your lungs it can penetrate causing more adverse effects. According to WHO, the safe limits for PM2.5 is 10 micrograms per cubic meter.

Emissions resulting from transportation is regarded as one of the major contributors to pollution levels, especially particulate matter. A study conducted by the Centre for Ecological Sciences of the Indian Institute of Science estimated that the transport sector constitutes 32% of Delhi’s emissions. It makes up 43% of Chennai’s emissions, and around 17% of Mumbai’s emissions.

Controlling emissions is a major task for cities and auto companies. The Indian government, to this end, has set emission standards for automobiles called the Bharat Stage emission standard, which mirrors European standards. This emission standard was first instituted in 1991 and has been regularly updated to follow European developments with a time lag of about 5 years. Bharat Stage IV emission norms have been the standard in 2010 in 13 major cities. To tackle air pollution that has intensified since then, the Indian government announced that Bharat Stage V norms would be skipped completely, and Stage VI norms would be adopted directly in 2020.

But sustainability in transport requires not only finding techniques to reduce the emissions from public and private transport but also developing components that are environment friendly. Car and auto component manufacturers have begun optimising products to be gentler on the environment and require lesser resources to manufacture, operate and maintain.

There are two important aspects of reducing emissions. The first is designing vehicles to consume less fuel. The second is making the emissions cleaner by reducing the toxic elements.

In auto exteriors, the focus is on developing light-weight but strong composite materials to replace metal. A McKinsey study estimates that plastic and carbon fibre can reduce weight by about 20% and 50% respectively. A lighter body reduces the engine effort and results in better fuel economy. Additionally, fuel efficiency can be increased by reducing the need for air conditioning which puts additional load on the vehicle engine thereby increasing fuel consumption. Automotive coatings (paints) and sheets provide better insulation, keep the vehicle cool and reduce the use of air conditioning.

Most emissions are the result of inefficient engines. Perhaps the most significant innovations in making automobiles and mass transport systems more eco-friendly are being done in the engine. Innovations include products like fuel additives, which improve engine performance, resist corrosion and reduce fuel consumption while offering a great driving experience, and catalytic converters that reduce toxic emissions by converting them to less harmful output such as carbon dioxide, Nitrogen and water. Some of these catalytic converters are now capable of eliminating over 90 percent of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides.

All of these are significant measures to bring the negative impacts of vehicular pollution under control. With over 2 million vehicles being produced in India in 2015 alone and the moving to BS VI emission standards, constant innovation is imperative.

Beyond this, in commercial as well as passenger vehicles, companies are innovating with components and processes to enable higher resource efficiency. Long-lasting paint coatings, made of eco-friendly materials that need to be refreshed less often are being developed. Companies are also innovating with an integrated coating process that enables carmakers to cut out an entire step of coating without compromising the colour result or the properties of the coating, saving time, materials and energy. Efforts are being made to make the interiors more sustainable. Parts like the instrument panel, dashboard, door side panels, seats, and locks can all be created with material like polyurethane plastic that is not only comfortable, durable and safe but also easily recyclable. Manufacturers are increasingly adopting polyurethane plastic like BASF’s Elastollan® for these very reasons.

From pioneering the development of catalytic converters in 1975 to innovating with integrated process technology for coatings, BASF has always been at the forefront of innovation when it comes to making transport solutions more sustainable. The company has already developed the technology to handle the move of emissions standards from BS IV to BS VI.

For the future, given the expected rise in the adoption of electric cars—an estimated 5~8 percent of car production is expected to be pure electric or plug-in electric vehicles by 2020—BASF is also developing materials that enable electric car batteries to last longer and achieve higher energy density, making electronic mobility more feasible. To learn more about how BASF is making transport more sustainable, see here.

Watch the video to see how automotive designers experimented with cutting edge materials from BASF to create an innovative concept car.

Play

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.

× Close