Policing the police

Extra-judicial killings by army, CRPF not covered by recent Supreme Court guidelines

Activists welcome Tuesday's Supreme Court guidelines but wish they'd gone further.

The Supreme Court’s guidelines on Tuesday making it mandatory for a magistrate to investigate so-called encounter deaths ‒ the euphemism for extra-judicial killings ‒ are a big step towards addressing the high number of extra-judicial deaths in India, say human rights activists. But many believe that the judgement may have missed out key issues.

On Tuesday, in response to a case filed by the People’s Union for Civil Liberties, the apex court issued a set of 16 guidelines to ensure that investigations into police encounters are carried out effectively and independently.

The guidelines include mandatory registration of first information reports in cases of encounter deaths, a magisterial inquiry into the case, investigations either by the Crime Investigation Department or another independent agency and holding back out-of-turn promotions or gallantry awards for police officers until the genuineness of the encounter is determined.

Since many encounters are conducted after alleged tip-offs about criminal activity from intelligence agencies, the Court now mandates that such tip-offs have to be recorded in writing before an operation is carried out.

News of encounter deaths are not surprising in India any more. Some high-profile cases such as the Ishrat Jahan and Sohrabuddin Sheikh cases in Gujarat have made encounters almost synonymous with fake encounters.

But the National Crime Records Bureau, which provides official data on crime statistics in the country, lists only a negligible number of fake encounters in its records. Between 2000 and 2013, for instance, the NCRB records only 19 registered cases of fake encounter killings, but no convictions.

It is other agencies, such as the National Human Rights Commission  and the Human Rights Watch, that provide alternative statistics on encounter killings.

According to activists, most encounters are passed off in police records as firing of other kinds. According to 2013 NCRB data, for instance, there were 684 instances of "police firing" across the country, which killed 103 people. These occasions are classified under riot control, anti-dacoity operations, action against terrorists and extremists and "others".

While taking note of this official data, the Supreme Court judgement mentions that the same NCRB report lists only two encounter deaths in India in 2013, both in Assam. “The figure raises doubts about its correctness,” the judgement says.

What the judgement is missing

While welcoming the Court’s judgement, some human rights activists believe its scope could have been widened to include other security forces too.

“As of now the judgement is confined to the police, but I wish it also covered security forces covered under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act,” said Babloo Loitongbam, the director of Human Rights Alert, a non-profit organisation in Manipur, a state where activists have consistently been protesting the atrocities committed by the armed forces.“Before 2012, 80% of Manipur’s encounter deaths were carried out by such forces, not the police, and the number of deaths sometimes went up to 500 a year.”

In September 2012, an organisation called Extra-judicial Execution Victims Families Association, Manipur filed a case in the Supreme Court demanding proper investigation into more than 1,500 encounter deaths over the years. The Court appointed a commission under Justice Santosh Hegde to randomly investigate a few cases, which were all found to be fake encounters, said Loitongbam. “Since then, the number of encounters has dropped sharply in Manipur,” he said.

Stringent monitoring

In addition to having a judgement that applies all security forces, activists point out the need for police reforms and more stringent monitoring of cases by the courts themselves.

“One of the reasons for fake encounters is that the police personnel often find it difficult to prove cases against criminals, and they decide to act as their own judges through encounters,” said Meenakshi Ganguly, the South Asia director at international non-profit Human Rights Watch. “This can change if the police is given better support and training in collecting evidence and ensuring the safety of witnesses.”

Human rights lawyer Vijay Hiremath points out the glitches in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh encounter trial to emphasise the need to have more pro-active courts. “[BJP president] Amit Shah has not been attending court hearings even though he is a murder accused in the case, and the prosecution is not even opposing his requests for exemption from the hearings,” said Hiremath. “So even if investigations into encounters are carried out by independent agencies, it would not be enough until courts are also more stringent.”

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

What hospitals can do to drive entrepreneurship and enhance patient experience

Hospitals can perform better by partnering with entrepreneurs and encouraging a culture of intrapreneurship focused on customer centricity.

At the Emory University Hospital in Atlanta, visitors don’t have to worry about navigating their way across the complex hospital premises. All they need to do is download wayfinding tools from the installed digital signage onto their smartphone and get step by step directions. Other hospitals have digital signage in surgical waiting rooms that share surgery updates with the anxious families waiting outside, or offer general information to visitors in waiting rooms. Many others use digital registration tools to reduce check-in time or have Smart TVs in patient rooms that serve educational and anxiety alleviating content.

Most of these tech enabled solutions have emerged as hospitals look for better ways to enhance patient experience – one of the top criteria in evaluating hospital performance. Patient experience accounts for 25% of a hospital’s Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) score as per the US government’s Centres for Medicare and Mediaid Services (CMS) programme. As a Mckinsey report says, hospitals need to break down a patient’s journey into various aspects, clinical and non-clinical, and seek ways of improving every touch point in the journey. As hospitals also need to focus on delivering quality healthcare, they are increasingly collaborating with entrepreneurs who offer such patient centric solutions or encouraging innovative intrapreneurship within the organization.

At the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott, some of the speakers from diverse industry backgrounds brought up the role of entrepreneurship in order to deliver on patient experience.

Getting the best from collaborations

Speakers such as Dr Naresh Trehan, Chairman and Managing Director - Medanta Hospitals, and Meena Ganesh, CEO and MD - Portea Medical, who spoke at the panel discussion on “Are we fit for the world of new consumers?”, highlighted the importance of collaborating with entrepreneurs to fill the gaps in the patient experience eco system. As Dr Trehan says, “As healthcare service providers we are too steeped in our own work. So even though we may realize there are gaps in customer experience delivery, we don’t want to get distracted from our core job, which is healthcare delivery. We would rather leave the job of filling those gaps to an outsider who can do it well.”

Meena Ganesh shares a similar view when she says that entrepreneurs offer an outsider’s fresh perspective on the existing gaps in healthcare. They are therefore better equipped to offer disruptive technology solutions that put the customer right at the center. Her own venture, Portea Medical, was born out of a need in the hitherto unaddressed area of patient experience – quality home care.

There are enough examples of hospitals that have gained significantly by partnering with or investing in such ventures. For example, the Children’s Medical Centre in Dallas actively invests in tech startups to offer better care to its patients. One such startup produces sensors smaller than a grain of sand, that can be embedded in pills to alert caregivers if a medication has been taken or not. Another app delivers care givers at customers’ door step for check-ups. Providence St Joseph’s Health, that has medical centres across the U.S., has invested in a range of startups that address different patient needs – from patient feedback and wearable monitoring devices to remote video interpretation and surgical blood loss monitoring. UNC Hospital in North Carolina uses a change management platform developed by a startup in order to improve patient experience at its Emergency and Dermatology departments. The platform essentially comes with a friendly and non-intrusive way to gather patient feedback.

When intrapreneurship can lead to patient centric innovation

Hospitals can also encourage a culture of intrapreneurship within the organization. According to Meena Ganesh, this would mean building a ‘listening organization’ because as she says, listening and being open to new ideas leads to innovation. Santosh Desai, MD& CEO - Future Brands Ltd, who was also part of the panel discussion, feels that most innovations are a result of looking at “large cultural shifts, outside the frame of narrow business”. So hospitals will need to encourage enterprising professionals in the organization to observe behavior trends as part of the ideation process. Also, as Dr Ram Narain, Executive Director, Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, points out, they will need to tell the employees who have the potential to drive innovative initiatives, “Do not fail, but if you fail, we still back you.” Innovative companies such as Google actively follow this practice, allowing employees to pick projects they are passionate about and work on them to deliver fresh solutions.

Realizing the need to encourage new ideas among employees to enhance patient experience, many healthcare enterprises are instituting innovative strategies. Henry Ford System, for example, began a system of rewarding great employee ideas. One internal contest was around clinical applications for wearable technology. The incentive was particularly attractive – a cash prize of $ 10,000 to the winners. Not surprisingly, the employees came up with some very innovative ideas that included: a system to record mobility of acute care patients through wearable trackers, health reminder system for elderly patients and mobile game interface with activity trackers to encourage children towards exercising. The employees admitted later that the exercise was so interesting that they would have participated in it even without a cash prize incentive.

Another example is Penn Medicine in Philadelphia which launched an ‘innovation tournament’ across the organization as part of its efforts to improve patient care. Participants worked with professors from Wharton Business School to prepare for the ideas challenge. More than 1,750 ideas were submitted by 1,400 participants, out of which 10 were selected. The focus was on getting ideas around the front end and some of the submitted ideas included:

  • Check-out management: Exclusive waiting rooms with TV, Internet and other facilities for patients waiting to be discharged so as to reduce space congestion and make their waiting time more comfortable.
  • Space for emotional privacy: An exclusive and friendly space for individuals and families to mourn the loss of dear ones in private.
  • Online patient organizer: A web based app that helps first time patients prepare better for their appointment by providing check lists for documents, medicines, etc to be carried and giving information regarding the hospital navigation, the consulting doctor etc.
  • Help for non-English speakers: Iconography cards to help non-English speaking patients express themselves and seek help in case of emergencies or other situations.

As Arlen Meyers, MD, President and CEO of the Society of Physician Entrepreneurs, says in a report, although many good ideas come from the front line, physicians must also be encouraged to think innovatively about patient experience. An academic study also builds a strong case to encourage intrapreneurship among nurses. Given they comprise a large part of the front-line staff for healthcare delivery, nurses should also be given the freedom to create and design innovative systems for improving patient experience.

According to a Harvard Business Review article quoted in a university study, employees who have the potential to be intrapreneurs, show some marked characteristics. These include a sense of ownership, perseverance, emotional intelligence and the ability to look at the big picture along with the desire, and ideas, to improve it. But trust and support of the management is essential to bringing out and taking the ideas forward.

Creating an environment conducive to innovation is the first step to bringing about innovation-driven outcomes. These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott, which is among the top 100 global innovator companies, is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the Scroll.in marketing team and not by the Scroll.in editorial staff.