tax money

Why the Indian government is forgoing revenues of $95 billion

While India’s subsidy bill is likely to fall almost 10%, the tax benefits for companies and individuals are expected to increase by 7%.

While the central government is expected to earn a tax revenue of Rs 919,842 crore ($148 billion) for the financial year 2015-16, it is expected to forgo revenue of Rs 589,285.2 crore ($95 billion) in 2014-15 due to exemptions granted to companies and individual taxpayers.

This forgone revenue, or tax benefits, is twice the defence budget allocation of Rs 247,000 crore in 2014-15.

Tax-revenue forgone is a contentious issue – an “incentive” or a “sop”, depending on ideological position – and becoming more so at a time when the National Democratic Alliance government plans cutbacks to India’s subsidy bill of Rs 2,27,287 crore ($36 billion).

While India’s subsidy bill is likely to fall almost 10%, the tax-revenue forgone is expected to increase by 7% from 2013-14.

Those on the left hold “sops” – such as accelerated depreciation, deduction of export profits of units located in special economic zones (SEZs), area-based exemptions and waivers on import duties – as evidence of government largesse to business at the expense of the poorest. Those on the right argue that tax-revenue forgone is an important business “incentive” to help the economy grow, without which the needs of the poor cannot be addressed.

Two days after Budget 2015, Professor Ashutosh Varshney, SoI Goldman Professor of International Studies and Social Sciences at Brown University, had this twitter exchange with economist and former chief economic advisor Arvind Virmani:


Revenue forgone includes exemptions granted to companies and individual taxpayers.

For instance, customs-duty exemptions  on precious stones and jewellery – an effort to boost the labour-intensive industry of polished gems and jewellery, India’s second highest export earner of principal commodities, are expected to reduce government revenue by Rs 75,592 crore in 2014-15.

Exemptions on import duties of mineral fuels and mineral oils – designed to keep cost of imports low since India is totally dependent on oil imports while petro products also play a big role in exports – are likely to reduce government revenue by Rs 72,180 crore.

Individual tax payers get various deductions, such as rebates for repayment of housing loans and investments in pension funds and medical insurance.  So, for example, rebates on repayment of housing loans, investment in life insurance policies etc (categories that fall under Section 80C) will reduce revenue by Rs 29,237 crore in 2014-15.

Given the polarised nature of the debate, some argue that many tax exemptions are wrongly listed.

“Most concessions included in revenue foregone undoubtedly contribute to enhancing public welfare or promoting exports. These should not be included in estimates of revenue forgone,” wrote Rajiv Kumar and Geetima Das Krishna, senior fellow and senior researcher at the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, in Mint. “Therefore, the finance ministry would do well to come up with a new methodology for calculating the actual revenue foregone and a new nomenclature for genuinely effective tax incentives. It is important to deny the ideologues this annual tamaasha (drama) of private-sector bashing.”

There’s a related issue: companies are also given tax incentives, and they pay lower taxes than individuals. The larger the company, it appears, lower the tax rate.

Why do companies pay lower tax than individuals?

Revenue forgone includes income-tax exemptions as well, almost 95% given to companies, the rest to individuals.

The effective tax rate for 564,787 companies that filed electronic returns for the financial year 2013-14 was only 23.22% while the standard rate varies between 33.21% and 33.99%.

Source: Budget 2015

The statement on revenue forgone, issued with Budget 2015, had this to say: “Companies with profits before taxes (PBT) of Rs 500 crore and above accounted for a total of 60.29% of the total PBT and a total of 53.71% of the total corporate income tax payable. However, their effective tax rate was 20.68% while the effective tax rate was 26.89% for companies with PBT up to Rs 1 crore.”

Clearly, bigger companies are paying lower taxes.

Services, a growing sector of the economy, were clearly pulling their weight. Their effective tax rate was 24.37%, for instance, compared to manufacturing’s tax of 21.96%.

The revenue impact due to the major incentives offered to corporate tax payers is expected to be Rs 62,398.60 crore in 2014-15, against Rs 57,793 the previous year, an increase of 8%.

The revenue impact of incentives given to individual tax payers, such as investments in insurance premiums, health insurance and donations, is likely to increase 15%, from Rs 30,771.8 crore in 2013-14 to Rs 35,293.6 crore in 2014-15.

The aggregate revenue impact due to incentives for indirect taxes is expected to be Rs 486,452 crore.

Source: Budget 2015

While individual tax payers account for only 6% of tax benefits, corporates, importers and exporters get 94% of such benefits.

The 14th Finance Commission, which submitted its report to the Finance Minister recently, also spoke about revenue forgone.  “Revenue forgone as estimated by the Union Government reached a peak of 8.1% of GDP in 2008-09 and as a percentage of gross tax revenue, it was the highest (77.3%) in 2009-10. Since 2004-05, revenue foregone has always been in excess of 5% of GDP.”

This article was originally published on, a data-driven and public-interest journalism non-profit.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.