Indian Super League

ISL semi-final, 1st leg: Thapa equaliser gives Chennaiyin FC away-goal advantage against Goa

With the 1-1 draw, Chennaiyin FC now need just a goalless draw in the second leg to advance to the summit clash.

Chennaiyin FC rallied to hold FC Goa to a 1-1 draw in the second semi-final of the Indian Super League in Goa on Saturday. The visitors head home with an away goal advantage.

After a barren first half, FC Goa, who had the lion’s share of possession, took the lead in the 64th minute through Manuel Lanzarote.

But Chennaiyin FC, who defended well and came up with dangerous counter moves, restored parity in the 71st minute through substitute Anirudh Thapa.

With the 1-1 draw, Chennaiyin FC now need just a goalless draw against FC Goa on March 13 to advance to the summit clash.

Backed by a vociferous home crowd, FC Goa went into attacking mode from the start. Mandar Rao Desai, who was threatening from the left flank, came up with a 25-yard shot which rival keeper Karanjit Singh did well to keep out of danger.

Chennaiyin FC came up with dangerous counter-attacks. A Jeje strike and Gregory Nelson’s low shot narrowly missed the target.

Soon after the start of the second half, the visitors had two close chances to take the lead. But keeper and captain Kattimani saved, without much ado, Jeje’s strike in the 46th minute and Nelson Alves’ shot a few seconds later.

After the close saves, the home team made inroads into the rival box and drew first blood in the 64th minute.

From the left, Mandar Rao Dessai sent a cross inside the box for Ferran Corominas, who took a crack at the goal. The shot, after deflecting off the goalie, landed on Manuel Lanzarote’s feet and the strike tapped it in to give the home team the lead.

But FC Goa’s joy lasted only for six minutes as the visitors found an equaliser through substitute Anirudh Thapa.

Gregory Nelson got past a rival defender inside the box and laid a through pass to substitute Anirudh Thapa, despatched the ball into the net.

Both the teams made couple of changes in the final stages in a desperation to break the stalemate.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.