Documentary channel

‘Nobody Speak’ documentary lionises Gawker as a champion of journalistic virtue

The Netflix film raises some valid questions but tries to be too many things at once.

In August 2016, the New York City-based website Gawker, which focused on celebrity gossip, announced that it would be shutting down. This was the result of the lawsuit that the wrestler Hulk Hogan (real name Terry Bollea) had filed against the company for publishing a sex tape in 2012 that Bollea claimed violated his privacy and damaged his reputation.

Bollea won the $140 million lawsuit, bankrupting Gawker. The case assumed interest because Bollea’s legal team was bankrolled by Peter Thiel, the Silicon Valley czar who had been outed as gay by Gawker in 2007. Among media circles, there was near-unanimous outrage at the ability of deep pockets to muzzle inconvenient media voices.

The new Netflix documentary Nobody Speak adopts this line too. Its director Brian Knappenberger painstakingly dissects the Florida trial that led to Bollea’s victory against Gawker, but it reserves face-to-face interviews with the dramatis personae of only the losing side.

Both Nick Denton, the editor-in-chief of Gawker, and AJ Daulerio, who published the Bollea story, are given space to offer their arguments, a ringing endorsement of the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press. Less charitably, the documentary casts aspersions on the judge who presided over the case.

In the second half, the documentary moves to broader territory, tackling the Thiel question. It shifts focus to billionaire Sheldon Adeslon’s 2016 buyout of the Las Vegas Review-Journal at about the same time that his attempts to swing a lawsuit in his favour petered out. The paper’s journalists, who are interviewed by Knappenberger, worry that the casino magnate would use this purchase to curry opinion in his favour.

And as with most things in 2017, Donald Trump is not far from the scene. The documentary speaks of the President’s disdain for conventional media, focusing on his rallies during the Presidential race when he openly criticised such icons of American news gathering as New York Times and CNN as “fake news”.

Nobody Speak.

For all its earnestness, Nobody Speak fuses entirely disparate issues to present an image of a sinister challenge mounted on the American media. For starters, its championing of Gawker – at one point in the documentary, constitutional lawyer Floyd Abrams says, “We don’t pick and choose what sort of publications are permissible because once we do, it allows the government to limit speech” – strikes as disingenuous.

The issue, which the documentary entirely omits to mention, is of public purpose. If a journalism trial reaches the courts, it is for the courts to decide if public good is served with the story under inspection. If Bollea’s sex life served a public role, the judiciary would have thrown his case out. Who finances the trial is of little relevance. Even if Thiel was being vindictive for Gawker outing him, and he chose to support Bollea financially for that reason, that does not matter ultimately.

Neither Thiel’s outing nor Bollea’s sex tape served any public cause and were bald intrusions into individual privacy. The media’s outrage at Gawker losing the trial is especially tone-deaf because the same setup has been vociferous about protecting individual privacy against government surveillance and military espionage.

On the other hand, the prospect of billionaires buying out media houses is indeed a matter worth investigating, but this too is a more complex issue than Nobody Speak allows. From Rupert Murdoch to Jeff Bezos, powerful corporate groups have owned and continue to own media interests. What we are then getting at is the larger issue of media ownership and ways to finance a media ecosystem that is not beholden to corporate interests.

Finally, the documentary’s dovetailing into Trump and “fake news” does not entirely wash. It is no secret that bicoastal media groups failed to estimate Trump’s popularity with Middle America due to a crowding out of voices from that region. And while fake news is a real problem in the age of social media, mainstream media is also guilty of blind spots and ideological tunnel vision.

Nobody Speak raises some valid questions but tries to be too many things at once. Most significantly, its attempt to provide a serious critique of the media ecosystem fails when it lionises a desperately clickbaity website as a champion of journalistic virtue.

Support our journalism by paying for Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Bringing the glamour back to flying while keeping it affordable

The pleasure of air travel is back, courtesy of an airline in India.

Before dinner, fashionable women would retire to the powder room and suited-up men would indulge in hors d’oeuvres, surrounded by plush upholstery. A gourmet meal would soon follow, served in fine tableware. Flying, back in the day, was like an upscale party 35,000 feet up in the air.

The glamour of flying has been chronicled in Keith Lovegrove’s book titled ‘Airline: Style at 30,000 feet’. In his book, Lovegrove talks about how the mid-50s and 60s were a “fabulously glamorous time to fly in commercial airlines”. Back then, flying was reserved for the privileged and the luxuries played an important role in making travelling by air an exclusive experience.

Fast forward to the present day, where flying has become just another mode of transportation. In Mumbai, every 65 seconds an aircraft lands or takes off at the airport. The condition of today’s air travel is a cumulative result of the growth in the volume of fliers, the accessibility of buying an air ticket and the number of airlines in the industry/market.

Having relegated the romance of flying to the past, air travel today is close to hectic and borderline chaotic thanks to busy airports, packed flights with no leg room and unsatisfactory meals. With the skies dominated by frequent fliers and the experience having turned merely transactional and mundane, is it time to bid goodbye to whatever’s enjoyable in air travel?

With increased resources and better technology, one airline is proving that flying in today’s scenario can be a refreshing, enjoyable and affordable experience at the same time. Vistara offers India’s first and only experience of a three-cabin configuration. At a nominal premium, Vistara’s Premium Economy is also redefining the experience of flying with a host of features such as an exclusive cabin, 20% extra legroom, 4.5-inch recline, dedicated check-in counter and baggage delivery on priority. The best in class inflight dining offers a range of regional dishes, while also incorporating global culinary trends. Other industry-first features include Starbucks coffee on board and special assistance to solo women travellers, including preferred seating.

Vistara’s attempts to reduce the gap between affordability and luxury can also be experienced in the economy class with an above average seat pitch, complimentary selection of food and beverages and a choice of leading newspapers and publications along with an inflight magazine. Hospitality aboard Vistara is, moreover, reminiscent of Singapore Airlines’ famed service with a seal of Tata’s trust, thanks to its cabin crew trained to similarly high standards.

The era of style aboard a ‘flying boat’ seems long gone. However, airlines like Vistara are bringing back the allure of air travel. Continuing their campaign with Deepika Padukone as brand ambassador, the new video delivers a bolder and a more confident version of the same message - making flying feel new again. Watch the new Vistara video below. For your next trip, rekindle the joy of flying and book your tickets here.


This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Vistara and not by the Scroll editorial team.