Fighting fundamentalism

Bullets to the editor: Five things you can't say in Pakistan

A failed assassination attempt on noted Pakistani journalist Raza Rumi highlights the dangers of speaking frankly in Pakistan.

Yesterday evening in central Lahore, unidentified gunmen attacked the car of senior Pakistani journalist Raza Rumi, who was on his way home after co-hosting a TV show on the Express News TV channel. The gunmen sprayed the car with bullets, 11 of which hit Rumi's 25-year-old driver, who succumbed to injuries. His guard is in a critical state. Rumi escaped miraculously unhurt but visibly shaken. "I was dreading this day," he tweeted.

Rumi is a co-anchor on the channel's daily show, Khabar Se Aagey, meaning "ahead of the news". He is also an editor with The Friday Times, a senior fellow at the Jinnah Institute think-tank and a frequent visitor to India. His visits to Delhi gave him the material for a book on the city, Delhi by Heart: Impressions of a Pakistani Traveller.

No organisation has taken responsibility for the attack, but it is clearly meant to silence him. The attack is also being linked to the channel, Express News, which is part of the Express media group, which also publishes an English and an Urdu newspaper, and an entertainment channel.  It is the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan's most despised media group. In December, the group's Karachi office faced a bomb attack that left three injured. The group did not heed that editorial warning, so three employees of the media group were gunned down on January 17. The TTP took responsibility for the attack, and its spokesperson agreed to explain on the group's own Express News channel why they did so. The Express group, he said, was playing the role of a propagandist against the Taliban.

While many in Pakistan, including its media, condemn the Taliban or argue for military action against it, the Express group was said to be the most outspoken. Faced with the Taliban's bullets to the editor, the English-language Express Tribune paper, the boldest of the group's offerings, decided to censor itself. An email to the staff from editor Kamal Siddiqi said the paper would have "nothing against any militant organisation and its allies like the Jamaat-e-Islami, religious parties and the (Pakistan) Tehrik-e-Insaf", the latter being the name of Imran Khan's party. There would also be "nothing on condemning any terrorist attack", "nothing against TTP or its statements" and "no opinion piece/cartoon on terrorism, militancy, the military, military operations, terror attacks". The Taliban could no longer be described as "outlawed" or "militant", and the features pages would become more conservative in choosing images of women.

The paper's op-ed pages were the worst affected, because they used to attempt to speak truth to power. One columnist, Ayesha Siddiqa, said that there were so many holy cows that she was only left with food as a subject to write about. Another columnist of the paper is Raza Rumi, and the assassination attempt on him is thus being seen as an attempt to silence him on Twitter, TV and other platforms.

After the failed assassination attempt, Rumi said he didn't plan to censor himself. Here are five things he's recently spoken or written about:

1. Condemn the threat to life by militant groups
The TV show Rumi co-hosted just before he was attacked was about a threat to the life of the Pakistan People's Party president Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. Bhutto had tweeted that he had received threat letters from the militant group Lashkar-e-Jhanghvi, which is known for its attacks on Shias. Since the Jhangvi group is said to be based in south Punjab, Bhutto said that he would hold the Punjab chief minister, Shahbaz Sharif, responsible for such an attack. Sharif belongs to the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz), whose leader Nazwaz Sharif is Pakistan's prime minister. Rumi's comments on the controversy, just before he was attacked, can be heard on the show.



2. Question mob violence in the name of blasphemy
This show also discusses a court's decision to award the death penalty to a Christian man, a road sweeper, accused of blasphemy against Prophet Mohammad. Some say it's a false case arising out of a personal dispute. When the alleged incident happened a year ago, a mob had set on fire the neighbourhood in which the Christian man lived, Lahore's Joseph Colony. Opposing the blasphemy law had led to the assassination of Punjab's governor Salman Taseer in 2011. Rumi's sarcasm in such matters perhaps annoys the supporters of the blasphemy law even more.

3. Oppose negotiations with the Taliban
Several supporters of Imran Khan's party were seen on Twitter dismissing the outrage over the attack on Rumi, and some were even making fun of it. Imran Khan is a leading advocate of peace talks and negotiations with the Pakistani Taliban, whereas Pakistani liberals like Rumi oppose such talks until the Pakistani Taliban puts down arms. This is what Rumi's last column in the Express Tribune was about. Critics of peace talks argue that the Taliban's long-term agenda of undermining the Pakistani state means there can be no negotiations with them. They think that negotiation will only increase the legitimacy and space for the extremists. Instead, they favour military action against them.

4. Persecution of Ahmadiyas
Even more urgent is the issue of the Ahmadiya sect, who in Pakistan are declared non-Muslim by law. Ahmadiyas migrated to Pakistan from Qadiyan, in Indian Punjab, and have often faced violence. Rumi is an outspoken critic of the persecution of Ahmadiyas.

5. Persecution of Shias
Considering Rumi's show just before his attempted assassination was about the Lashkar-e-Jhanghvi's threats to public figures including Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Rumi's writings and TV appearances against the persecution of Shias in Pakistan may also not have gone down well with militants. The persecution of Shias has increased so much in recent years that some call it "genocide".

 
Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Tracing the formation of Al Qaeda and its path to 9/11

A new show looks at some of the crucial moments leading up to the attack.

“The end of the world war had bought America victory but not security” - this quote from Lawrence Wright’s Pulitzer-Prize winning book, ‘The Looming Tower’, gives a sense of the growing threat to America from Al Qaeda and the series of events that led to 9/11. Based on extensive interviews, including with Bin Laden’s best friend in college and the former White House counterterrorism chief, ‘The Looming Tower’ provides an intimate perspective of the 9/11 attack.

Lawrence Wright chronicles the formative years of Al Qaeda, giving an insight in to Bin Laden’s war against America. The book covers in detail, the radicalisation of Osama Bin Laden and his association with Ayman Al Zawahri, an Egyptian doctor who preached that only violence could change history. In an interview with Amazon, Wright shared, “I talked to 600-something people, but many of those people I talked to again and again for a period of five years, some of them dozens of times.” Wright’s book was selected by TIME as one of the all-time 100 best nonfiction books for its “thoroughly researched and incisively written” account of the road to 9/11 and is considered an essential read for understanding Islam’s war on the West as it developed in the Middle East.

‘The Looming Tower’ also dwells on the response of key US officials to the rising Al Qaeda threat, particularly exploring the turf wars between the FBI and the CIA. This has now been dramatized in a 10-part mini-series of the same name. Adapted by Dan Futterman (of Foxcatcher fame), the series mainly focuses on the hostilities between the FBI and the CIA. Some major characters are based on real people - such as John O’ Neill (FBI’s foul-mouthed counterterrorism chief played by Jeff Daniels) and Ali Soufan (O’ Neill’s Arabic-speaking mentee who successfully interrogated captured Islamic terrorists after 9/11, played by Tahar Rahim). Some are composite characters, such as Martin Schmidt (O’Neill’s CIA counterpart, played by Peter Sarsgaard).

The series, most crucially, captures just how close US intelligence agencies had come to foiling Al Qaeda’s plans, just to come up short due to internal turf wars. It follows the FBI and the CIA as they independently follow intelligence leads in the crises leading up to 9/11 – the US Embassy bombings in East Africa and the attack on US warship USS Cole in Yemen – but fail to update each other. The most glaring example is of how the CIA withheld critical information – Al Qaeda operatives being hunted by the FBI had entered the United States - under the misguided notion that the CIA was the only government agency authorised to deal with terrorism threats.

The depth of information in the book has translated into a realistic recreation of the pre-9/11 years on screen. The drama is even interspersed with actual footage from the 9/11 conspiracy, attack and the 2004 Commission Hearing, linking together the myriad developments leading up to 9/11 with chilling hindsight. Watch the trailer of this gripping show below.

Play

The Looming Tower is available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video, along with a host of Amazon originals and popular movies and TV shows. To enjoy unlimited ad free streaming anytime, anywhere, subscribe to Amazon Prime Video.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Amazon Prime Video and not by the Scroll editorial team.