Title

× Close
Election 2014

City-centred AAP's best shot in South India actually comes from rural Kanyakumari

Anti-nuclear activist SP Udayakumar proves why grassroots credibility is more important than boardroom experience to win an election.

Since its inception, the Aam Aadmi Party has had its greatest appeal in India’s cities. After its rise to power in Delhi, it has found an enthusiastic support base in places like Bangalore and Chennai. But while the party is tipped to win a considerable vote share in South Indian cities, it isn’t expected to win any seats. Ironically, its best shot of winning a seat in the south isn’t in an urban centre: it’s in rural Kanyakumari.

AAP’s hopes here are riding on the shoulders of its very popular candidate, the anti-nuclear campaigner Dr SP Udayakumar.

In 2012 and ’13, Udayakumar led a powerful movement against the Rs 17,000-crore Kudankulam Nuclear Power plant, 24 km from India’s southern tip. The activist managed to mobilise thousands of fisherpeople to throw themselves into an agitation that lasted for nearly two years. They claimed that the plant would damage the environment and ruin their livelihoods. Though the plant was finally commissioned in October after the movement was put down by force and several cases were filed against Udayakumar, the activist remains a hero for the area's fishermen.

Udayakumar is a reminder to the AAP leadership that high-profile corporate executives who join the party in cities may end up making news but grassroots activists who have worked and earned the trust of people is far more important in an election. His AAP colleague, activist Medha Patkar, who is contesting from Mumbai, would agree.

“It is important for candidates to work with the people and win their trust before contesting an election,” Udayakumar said. “Just jumping into an election does not serve any purpose.”

When he joined the AAP in February, he did so at the Idinthakarai village, which was ground zero for the anti-nuclear protests. Many people who fought the battle against the nuclear plant alongside him are fiercely campaigning for him. “This is not for AAP but to show the government how people remain seriously committed to the anti-nuclear activist and the movement he started,” Peter Milton, a resident of Idinthakarai, over the phone to Scroll.in.

In fact, AAP supporters in Kanyakumari haven’t been carrying the party’s broom symbol or party leader Arvind Kejriwal’s photos as they go out campaigning. Instead, they have been wearing t-shirts with Udayakumar’s photos and Udayakumar face masks.

“I am a clean and committed candidate with local appeal, in a clean and committed party with a national appeal,” Udayakumar told Scroll.in. “The union of the two is what voters respond to.”

AAP has also fielded another anti-nuclear activists in southern Tamil Nadu. M Pushparayan, who worked  with Udayakumar in the agitation, is running in the Tuticorin constituency, which adjoins Kanyakumari. However, the party's star campaigner is Udayakumar. “He may or may not win in the end, but he is certain to give a tough fight and poll much more than any other AAP candidate in the state,” said Meenakshi Mahadevan, a journalist who has been following Udayakumar closely from the time anti-nuclear protests began.

Interestingly, the BJP, which has a negligible presence in most parts of Tamil Nadu, is at its strongest in Kanyakumari. Party state president Pon Radhakrishnan is its candidate there. He polled close to 33% of the vote in 2009 and took second place. J Helen Davidson of the Dravida Munnettra Kazhagam was the winner.

This time, the BJP has formed an alliance with smaller parties in the state, but the fishing community remains key to victory. If Udayakumar makes a considerable dent into that community, the other candidates could be in trouble.

 
We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BULLETIN BY 

Making transportation more sustainable even with fuel-based automobiles

These innovations can reduce the pollution caused by vehicles.

According to the WHO’s Ambient Air Pollution Database released in 2016, ten of the twenty most polluted cities in the world are in India, with Gwalior and Ahmedabad occupying the second and third positions. Pollution levels are usually expressed in the levels of particulate matter (PM) in the air. This refers to microscopic matter that is a mixture of smoke, metals, chemicals and dust suspended in the atmosphere that can affect human health. Particulate matter is easily inhaled, and can cause allergies and diseases such as asthma, lung cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Indian cities have some of the highest levels of PM10 (particles smaller than 10 micrometres in diameter) and PM2.5 particles (particles smaller than 2.5 micrometres in diameter). The finer the particulate matter, the deeper into your lungs it can penetrate causing more adverse effects. According to WHO, the safe limits for PM2.5 is 10 micrograms per cubic meter.

Emissions resulting from transportation is regarded as one of the major contributors to pollution levels, especially particulate matter. A study conducted by the Centre for Ecological Sciences of the Indian Institute of Science estimated that the transport sector constitutes 32% of Delhi’s emissions. It makes up 43% of Chennai’s emissions, and around 17% of Mumbai’s emissions.

Controlling emissions is a major task for cities and auto companies. The Indian government, to this end, has set emission standards for automobiles called the Bharat Stage emission standard, which mirrors European standards. This emission standard was first instituted in 1991 and has been regularly updated to follow European developments with a time lag of about 5 years. Bharat Stage IV emission norms have been the standard in 2010 in 13 major cities. To tackle air pollution that has intensified since then, the Indian government announced that Bharat Stage V norms would be skipped completely, and Stage VI norms would be adopted directly in 2020.

But sustainability in transport requires not only finding techniques to reduce the emissions from public and private transport but also developing components that are environment friendly. Car and auto component manufacturers have begun optimising products to be gentler on the environment and require lesser resources to manufacture, operate and maintain.

There are two important aspects of reducing emissions. The first is designing vehicles to consume less fuel. The second is making the emissions cleaner by reducing the toxic elements.

In auto exteriors, the focus is on developing light-weight but strong composite materials to replace metal. A McKinsey study estimates that plastic and carbon fibre can reduce weight by about 20% and 50% respectively. A lighter body reduces the engine effort and results in better fuel economy. Additionally, fuel efficiency can be increased by reducing the need for air conditioning which puts additional load on the vehicle engine thereby increasing fuel consumption. Automotive coatings (paints) and sheets provide better insulation, keep the vehicle cool and reduce the use of air conditioning.

Most emissions are the result of inefficient engines. Perhaps the most significant innovations in making automobiles and mass transport systems more eco-friendly are being done in the engine. Innovations include products like fuel additives, which improve engine performance, resist corrosion and reduce fuel consumption while offering a great driving experience, and catalytic converters that reduce toxic emissions by converting them to less harmful output such as carbon dioxide, Nitrogen and water. Some of these catalytic converters are now capable of eliminating over 90 percent of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides.

All of these are significant measures to bring the negative impacts of vehicular pollution under control. With over 2 million vehicles being produced in India in 2015 alone and the moving to BS VI emission standards, constant innovation is imperative.

Beyond this, in commercial as well as passenger vehicles, companies are innovating with components and processes to enable higher resource efficiency. Long-lasting paint coatings, made of eco-friendly materials that need to be refreshed less often are being developed. Companies are also innovating with an integrated coating process that enables carmakers to cut out an entire step of coating without compromising the colour result or the properties of the coating, saving time, materials and energy. Efforts are being made to make the interiors more sustainable. Parts like the instrument panel, dashboard, door side panels, seats, and locks can all be created with material like polyurethane plastic that is not only comfortable, durable and safe but also easily recyclable. Manufacturers are increasingly adopting polyurethane plastic like BASF’s Elastollan® for these very reasons.

From pioneering the development of catalytic converters in 1975 to innovating with integrated process technology for coatings, BASF has always been at the forefront of innovation when it comes to making transport solutions more sustainable. The company has already developed the technology to handle the move of emissions standards from BS IV to BS VI.

For the future, given the expected rise in the adoption of electric cars—an estimated 5~8 percent of car production is expected to be pure electric or plug-in electric vehicles by 2020—BASF is also developing materials that enable electric car batteries to last longer and achieve higher energy density, making electronic mobility more feasible. To learn more about how BASF is making transport more sustainable, see here.

Watch the video to see how automotive designers experimented with cutting edge materials from BASF to create an innovative concept car.

Play

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.

× Close