Drug addiction

Psychiatrists claim Punjab police are pressuring them to reveal drug patients' identities

The state police are trying to trace drug peddlers through psychiatrists and their patients, say doctors, calling the measure patently unethical.

In the past year, the Punjab government has intensified its efforts to tackle the state’s notorious drug addiction problem, but the Punjab police’s latest drive to track drug peddlers has sparked outrage among mental health professionals.

Psychiatrists in Punjab allege that for the past six days, police officials in various districts have been pressuring them to reveal contact details of their patients – addicts seeking medical treatment – who would then be made to reveal the identities of drug peddlers.

For mental health professionals, revealing personal details or any information about their patients to a third party would be in clear violation of the confidentiality agreement they have with patients. It would also violate the official code of medical ethics published by the Medical Council of India for all registered doctors to follow. The code of ethics states that medical practitioners cannot disclose secrets of a patient that have been learnt in the exercise of their profession.

Despite being informed of these ethical guidelines, the Punjab police have been trying to get information about addicts for almost a week, claim psychiatrists who Scroll.in spoke to.

“Through our psychiatrists’ network, I have been able to confirm that this is happening in at least four districts,” said a Chandigarh-based mental health practitioner on condition of anonymity. Doctors in both private and state-run hospitals and de-addiction centres have been approached by the police, he said. “Some doctors have tried to explain that this method is unacceptable, some have resisted and tried to buy time. But if this continues it could lead to a lot of harassment and arm-twisting of doctors.”

The official version

When Scroll contacted the headquarters of the Punjab police as well as the state government’s health department, lower-ranked officials in both offices acknowledged the new tactic of tracking down drug peddlers through psychiatrists and their patients.

“Yes, that drive has been started, but you will have to speak to the seniors for more information,” said an official at the police’s narcotics control bureau. A senior official, however, denied approaching psychiatrists.

“Whenever we come across addicts, we question them about the source of the drugs they used, but we are not reaching addicts through doctors,” said Bhupinder Singh, the additional inspector general at the narcotics control bureau headquartered in Ludhiana.

Senior bureaucrats at the health department could not be reached despite several attempts.

Pressure and intimidation

Psychiatrists reaching out to journalists and activists on Friday, however, had a completely different story to tell.

“This week, I have had police officials enter my clinic and demand information about my patients in an intimidating manner – and this has also happened to several other psychiatrists I know,” said Dr Singh (name changed), who did not wish to reveal his identity or the name of the city he works in. “So far they have not entered my room in the presence of a patient, but imagine a police officer waiting outside your door for three hours, pressuring you to give out confidential information that would breach the unwritten contract between doctor and patient.”

Dr Singh said that many psychiatrists are willing to give the police the total number of drug addiction patients they have been treating, but not addresses and phone numbers of individual patients, which is what the police allegedly want.

“The police seem to think that we should give them this information because drug addicts are criminals,” he said. “My fear is that doctors in government hospitals might end up giving out information because they are in a more vulnerable position.”

Other medical professionals dismissed the idea that the police could justify their means just because drug abuse is a criminal offence. “Drug addiction is not just a ‘criminal’ act. There are many scenarios where ethics clash with superfluous legality,” said Dr Sanjay Nagral, a Mumbai-based surgeon and publisher of the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. “It is the duty of the doctor to treat the patient and protect the patient’s privacy and confidentiality.”

Political back-story?

Some doctors believe the new police tactic was born out of the public spat between Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal and union Social Empowerment Minister Thawar Chand Gehlot on June 26 in Hoshiarpur. Gehlot – a BJP leader – was in the district to inaugurate a new drug rehabilitation centre on the occasion of International Anti-drug Day.

During his speech, Gehlot claimed that Punjab had the highest number of drug addicts in India, which was seen as a jibe against Badal’s Shiromani Akali Dal. Badal countered Gehlot’s claims in his own speech by claiming that the state’s drug addiction problem was under control and that attempts were being made to tarnish Punjab’s image.

“That incident was all over the news and it was embarrassing for the chief minister – so this is most likely the reason why the government has asked the police to crack down on drug use urgently,” said the Chandigarh-based doctor. “I can’t think of any other reason why the police is trying to get information from psychiatrists, who have ready data on addicts.”

‘This could push people to suicide’

The method, however, is questionable for various reasons, say mental health professionals.

“For one, breaching confidentiality would violate our code of ethics. If the patient files a court case, he would almost definitely win,” said Dr Singh. Doctors could also get in trouble with the Medical Council of India and lose their licenses as practitioners.

“But the basic point is that this is intrusive,” said Singh. “Many patients don’t tell their families that they are seeing a psychiatrist. They are weak and vulnerable, and if their parents or spouses or children find out because of the police, some might end up committing suicide.”

Doctors are also afraid that the police drive might scare addicts off treatment and seeking help at de-addiction centres, which would inevitably push them back into drug abuse.

A group of psychiatrists from across the state have now drafted a letter to be sent to the state home minister, appealing for an end to the unethical police investigation.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.

Play

In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.

Play

Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.

Play

The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.

Play

The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.