The Daily Fix

The Daily Fix: Tying up loose ends of 2002, policeman who accused Modi of role in riots is sacked

Everything you need to know for the day (and a little more).

Above the Fold: top stories of the day
1. Real-estate tycoons Sushil and Gopal Ansal were convicted for negligence leading to the horrific Uphaar cinema fire in Delhi in 1997 that killed 59 people, but will be let off with only a fine.
2. Even after the midnight police raid on Tuesday, students of Film and Television Institute of India ruled out any compromise on their primary demand for the removal of TV actor Gajendra Chauhan as chairman.
3. Throwing the Modi government’s overtures into a tizzy, Pakistan has extended an invitation for a meeting to Kashmiri separatists.

The Big Story: Action-reaction
Police officer Sanjiv Bhatt, who had challenged the Narendra Modi administration in Gujarat on its account of the 2002 riots, has been sacked from the Indian Police Service.

In April 2011, Bhatt had filed a petition in the Supreme Court accusing Modi and the Gujarat government he headed at the time of encouraging the pogrom that left about 1,000 people dead. Most of them were Muslim. Bhatt claimed that he had attended a meeting at Modi’s residence on February 27, 2002, at which the chief minister allegedly told his officers to “allow Hindus to vent their anger”. Bhatt was suspended soon after this.

Bhatt's claim were rejected by the Special Investigation Team inquiring into the 2002 riots since it did not square with the testimonies of other people at the meeting.

The reasons given for his sacking include various counts of indiscipline such as staying absent from duty without permission and defying the orders of superior officers.

Bhatt denied these charges.  “This so-called 'unauthorised absence from duty' pertains to the period when I was deposing before the SIT and the Nanavati Commission" inquiring into the Gujarat riots, he said. However, Bhatt said he would refrain from filing an appeal: “if the Government of the day does not require my services, so be it."

Last week, the Gujarat government issued a show-cause notice to Bhatt over a video purportedly showing him with a woman. The notice asked him to explain whether he was having an extra-marital affair.

The Big Scroll: Scroll.in on the day’s biggest story
Using the apparatus of the state to muzzle voices regarding the 2002 pogrom isn’t limited to Sanjiv Bhatt. Since coming to power in 2014, the Modi government has been hounding activist Teesta Seetalvad, using the Central Bureau of Investigation.

The CBI raided Teesta Setalvad's home two weeks before Gujarat high court hears case against Modi's 'clean chit'. However, these charges seem to have little substance.

Politicking & Policying
1. The Congress slammed the government’s double-speak on the Land Bill.
2. Jain protests against the ban on Santhara, the practice of ritual suicide, are gathering strength.
3. As a repercussion of the National Herald case against Sonai Gandhi, which fell through, Rajan S Katoch was replaced as the director of the Enforcement Directorate by senior police officer Karnal Singh.

Punditry
1. In the Indian Express, Bruce Riedel looks at the legacy of the ISI's Hamid Gul.
2. What are the lessons India can learn from the Kumbh Mela, asks Rahul Jacob in the Business Standard.
3. In the Indian Express, Ram Punyani explores how the historiography of Shivaji in Maharashtra has been completely communalised and sectarianised.

Don't Miss
Will Zakia Jafri’s fresh plea for justice take Gujarat riot investigations to Modi’s doorstep, asks Darshan Desai.
The crux of the arguments by Zakia’s advocates Mihir Desai, MM Tirmizi and others is that the targeted communal attacks on Muslims after the burning of a train coach in Godhra that killed 59 persons, mostly kar sevaks returning from Ayodhya, on February 27, 2002, was not the result of a natural Hindu outburst but a larger conspiracy hatched at the highest political level in Gujarat.

The advocates say that the manner in which the violence played out for 72 hours, when major massacres occurred in the state, could not have been so neatly organised without an elaborate conspiracy, assignment of roles and the material wherewithal for such killings already being in place. For over two months before this, there had been an incendiary revival of the Ramjanmabhoomi movement in Ayodhya by the Vishva Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal.

 

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.

Play

In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.

Play

Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.

Play

The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.

Play

The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.