Fair Wage

Modi government’s weird maths for a minimum wage: Rs 390 for monthly rent, Rs 16 for veggies

Trade unions are filled with misgivings as the government prepares to set a legally binding national minimum wage.

In Bawal, Haryana, as the morning shift ends, a group of workers streaming out of the forging unit of Bajaj Motors gather around for a chat. There is general discontentment among them over wages: in June, the workers had filed a notice in the district labour court to demand a raise. They are collectively amused when they are told that the central government already has plans to revise the minimum wage based on the prices of foodstuff and other costs of living.

“Who has made this list?” asked Vinay Kant Mishra, who works as a machine operator. “Please tell me which vegetable costs Rs 16 per kilo and where can one can stay for Rs 390 per month?”

Mishra’s mirth is not shared by central trade unions. The unions are filled with misgivings as the National Democratic Alliance government prepares to restructure labour laws through eight legislative amendments in the winter session of the Parliament in November. Troubling them the most is a proposed amendment to the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, that will set a legally binding national minimum wage – below which no worker can be paid – across all Indian states and industries.

The problem, they say, is that the Indian government is not raising it enough.

In its draft calculations, the government has set the national minimum wage at Rs 273 a day or Rs 7,100 a month, say trade unions. This is less than half of what it ought to be if the Supreme Court guidelines, and the norms proposed in the Indian Labour Conference 1957, were applied to current prices. The unions demand that every worker be assured of at least Rs 15,000 a month in wages.

What will change?

At present, the central government and the states fix the minimum wage in different categories of work. Under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, the Centre determines the minimum wage in 45 categories and the states in 1,679 categories. Labour economists say multiple deciding authorities and wage rates make it difficult for workers to know, and demand, their minimum wage, which worsens income inequality and poverty.

It doesn’t help that though there is a national floor minimum wage does exist – currently fixed at Rs 160 a day – it is only suggestive and not legally binding. This means that the authorities can set the daily minimum wage lower than Rs 160, if they so deem.

The government says the amendment to the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 will address some of these issues. It contends that a legally binding national minimum will lead to better compliance – in 2010, only 61% workers in India got paid a minimum wage. Union Labour and Employment Minister Bandaru Dattatreya describes the proposal on wages as a sign of the government’s “positive approach to workers’ demands”. 

PP Mitra, Principal Labour and Employment Advisor, Ministry of Labour and Employment, says the government recommended the new minimum wage after tripartite talks with industry and trade unions, and after it was cleared by an Inter-Ministerial Group headed by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley.

“A national minimum wage has been proposed in the Bill after wide consultations with industry and trade unions,” Mitra said. “We have divided states and union territories into three categories – high-, middle- and low-income. The tripartite Central Advisory Board on minimum wages will further recommend wages in each category.”

Whatever the Board’s final suggestions, a national minimum wage of Rs 7,100 will still be lower than the existing minimum wage for unskilled work in some states, such as Haryana (currently Rs 7,600 per month) and Delhi (Rs 9,178 per month). It will only help workers in states such as Uttar Pradesh, where the minimum wage is currently fixed at Rs 6,814 per month.

Trade union representatives have opposed the government proposal. They say the government is undermining tripartite institutions. “The Central Advisory Board on wages has not met even once since this government came to power,” noted Dr Kashmir Singh, a member of the Board and General Secretary, Centre for Indian Trade Unions. “How do they then expect the Board to play a more active role in recommending revisions under the new law?”

Calories and other calculations

Ministry officials say the government arrived at the new national minimum wage by following the recommendations of the 15th Indian Labour Conference (an annual event organised by the ministry of labour and employment to decide on workers’ issues) of 1957, and the Supreme Court in the Raptakos Brett Vs Workers’ Union case of 1992.

The 15th Indian Labour Conference had recommended fixing minimum wages based on:

1. Per capita food intake of at least 2,700 calories for a worker’s family of three members
2. Per capita cloth of at least 18 yards per year
3. House rent at the rate of 10% of the expenditure on food and clothing
4. Fuel/lighting, etc. at the rate of 20% of expenditure on food and clothing

Decades later, the Supreme Court ordered that 25% of the expenditure on food, cloth, rent, fuel should be added as expenses on education, health, etc. to calculate the minimum wage.

Using this formula, the National Institute of Nutrition in Hyderabad estimated that the expenditure of a worker in the smallest class ‘C’ cities adds up to Rs 211 daily or Rs 6,330 per month. After inflating this with the consumer price index for June, the figure was rounded off to Rs 7,100 per month. Government experts arrived at this calculation by estimating everyday expenses at the following rates:

As the table shows, the proposal is based on calculations which estimate dal at only Rs 65 per kilo, vegetable at Rs 16 per kilo, milk at Rs 33 a litre, and a monthly rent of Rs 390. These rates are patently out-dated, point out trade unions.

“In 2014, we prepared an estimate on basis of actual average of retail prices of these items in seven cities – Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata Bangalore, Bhubaneswar and Thiruvananthapuram,” said Tapan Sen, Rajya Sabha MP and vice president of the Centre of Indian Trade Unions. “The expenses come to Rs 20,861 [a month], or Rs 802 a day.”

Gurudas Dasgupta, who is General Secretary of All India Trade Union Congress, says that 12 central trade unions have proposed pegging the national minimum wage at least at Rs 15,000 a month.

Workers in Uttar Pradesh and Haryana express amusement at the government’s estimations.

“Tur dal is now Rs 200 per kilo, milk is Rs 55 a litre,” said Rajesh Yadav, who works with Vinay Kant Mishra at the forging unit of Bajaj Motors in Bawal. Yadav pays Rs 3,000 for a one-room tenement in Bawal and an electricity bill of Rs 1,000 per month. He says his wife and children lived in the village near Kanpur because he could not afford space in Bawal for all of them.

Ram Vachan, a welder at a metal polish unit in sector 80 in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, says he finds it difficult to support a family on a salary of Rs 7,000 per month because of the steep living costs in Noida. “For some years now, along with wages, the company has given us monthly rations,” he said. “They gave us 5 kilo atta, 3 kilo rice, and 2 kilo chana dal every month. But three month back chana dal rates doubled from Rs 40 to Rs 80, and they cut chana dal rations by half, from 2 to 1 kg a month.”

Brijesh Upadhaya, who is General Secretary of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh-affiliated Bhartiya Mazdoor Sangh, says it was a positive development that the government is willing to set a legal national minimum wage. “The government is willing to follow the guidelines,” declared Upadhaya. “The rates can be updated and revised later on.”

For their part, representatives of the Confederation of Indian Industry, an association of Indian businesses, say it will be best to leave the fixing of minimum wage to state governments, who may “fix this as per local conditions and economic dynamics”.

*Workers' names have been changed

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Tracing the formation of Al Qaeda and its path to 9/11

A new show looks at some of the crucial moments leading up to the attack.

“The end of the world war had bought America victory but not security” - this quote from Lawrence Wright’s Pulitzer-Prize winning book, ‘The Looming Tower’, gives a sense of the growing threat to America from Al Qaeda and the series of events that led to 9/11. Based on extensive interviews, including with Bin Laden’s best friend in college and the former White House counterterrorism chief, ‘The Looming Tower’ provides an intimate perspective of the 9/11 attack.

Lawrence Wright chronicles the formative years of Al Qaeda, giving an insight in to Bin Laden’s war against America. The book covers in detail, the radicalisation of Osama Bin Laden and his association with Ayman Al Zawahri, an Egyptian doctor who preached that only violence could change history. In an interview with Amazon, Wright shared, “I talked to 600-something people, but many of those people I talked to again and again for a period of five years, some of them dozens of times.” Wright’s book was selected by TIME as one of the all-time 100 best nonfiction books for its “thoroughly researched and incisively written” account of the road to 9/11 and is considered an essential read for understanding Islam’s war on the West as it developed in the Middle East.

‘The Looming Tower’ also dwells on the response of key US officials to the rising Al Qaeda threat, particularly exploring the turf wars between the FBI and the CIA. This has now been dramatized in a 10-part mini-series of the same name. Adapted by Dan Futterman (of Foxcatcher fame), the series mainly focuses on the hostilities between the FBI and the CIA. Some major characters are based on real people - such as John O’ Neill (FBI’s foul-mouthed counterterrorism chief played by Jeff Daniels) and Ali Soufan (O’ Neill’s Arabic-speaking mentee who successfully interrogated captured Islamic terrorists after 9/11, played by Tahar Rahim). Some are composite characters, such as Martin Schmidt (O’Neill’s CIA counterpart, played by Peter Sarsgaard).

The series, most crucially, captures just how close US intelligence agencies had come to foiling Al Qaeda’s plans, just to come up short due to internal turf wars. It follows the FBI and the CIA as they independently follow intelligence leads in the crises leading up to 9/11 – the US Embassy bombings in East Africa and the attack on US warship USS Cole in Yemen – but fail to update each other. The most glaring example is of how the CIA withheld critical information – Al Qaeda operatives being hunted by the FBI had entered the United States - under the misguided notion that the CIA was the only government agency authorised to deal with terrorism threats.

The depth of information in the book has translated into a realistic recreation of the pre-9/11 years on screen. The drama is even interspersed with actual footage from the 9/11 conspiracy, attack and the 2004 Commission Hearing, linking together the myriad developments leading up to 9/11 with chilling hindsight. Watch the trailer of this gripping show below.


The Looming Tower is available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video, along with a host of Amazon originals and popular movies and TV shows. To enjoy unlimited ad free streaming anytime, anywhere, subscribe to Amazon Prime Video.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Amazon Prime Video and not by the Scroll editorial team.