Shortly after the report was released on Friday, Bharatiya Janata Party supporters began to suggest that Faraz Syed, who wrote the report, was actually Habib's son-in-law. In recent months, the respected academician has been very critical of what he perceives to be the growing climate of intolerance in the country. In a speech on Monday had compared the BJP's ideological parent, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, to the Islamic State militant group.
Syed's alleged relationship with Habib was seen as further evidence of the historian's malevolent campaign against the ruling party.
Moody’s Analytics, an economic research and analysis firm that works independently of its credit rating wing, had released a report on Friday, warning that rising tensions in India could harm its economic prospects.
“While Modi has largely distanced himself from the nationalist gibes, the belligerent provocation of various Indian minorities has raised ethnic tensions,” Syed wrote. “Along with a possible increase in violence, the government will face stiffer opposition in the Upper House as debate turns away from economic policy. Modi must keep his members in check or risk losing domestic and global credibility.”
On Wednesday, the government issued a petulant press note painting the report as a “personal opinion” of a junior analyst and criticising the manner in which the media had reported the Moody's warning.
Yet back on Twitter, users were still furiously repeating another canard. Noted BJP supporter and columnist Tavleen Singh joined the fray early.
@venks238 @swapan55 I think it is true that Irfan Habib's relative wrote the Moody report warning India that its image was damaged.
— Tavleen Singh (@tavleen_singh) November 2, 2015
Soon after, Rupa Subramanya, a Twitter user who is popular with Modi supporters, retweeted this with a rider.
The gratuitous political commentary stuff from Moody's Analytics appeared out of place when I read it. Now it makes sense! — Rupa Subramanya (@rupasubramanya) November 2, 2015
And there were many others.
@Swamy39 Did you know that Faryaz the analyst from Moody's who cautioned India on intolerance & investment is Irfan Habib's son in law??? — Kapil Vyas (@kaps_hunt) November 3, 2015
So, it turns out that Mr Moody is the son in law of Irfan Habib, the great court historian of Nehru Gandhis. It... https://t.co/wZZT9k9dQ6 — Travelphile (@swayamt) November 1, 2015
By Wednesday night, no less than the Bharatiya Janata Party national secretary Sidharth Nath Singh had appeared on a Times Now television debate, blaring this alleged relationship to viewers.
#IntoleranceDebate Assoc Eco happens 2 b son in law of historian Irfan Habib his famous quote RSS is like ISIS. Debate is over — Sidharth Nath Singh (@sidharthnsingh) November 3, 2015
#ToleranceTussle I said on @TimesNow Moody Analysis Assoc Economist is son in law of historian Irfan Habib who said RSS is like ISIS
— Sidharth Nath Singh (@sidharthnsingh) November 3, 2015
Saman Habib’s statement should ideally put an end to these rumours. Yet an entire day after she posted it, there are still people on Twitter convinced that Irfan Habib hatched a plot with his son-in-law (or grandson, or son) Faraz Syed (or "Mr Moody") to write a report that would appear to originate from an internationally renowned rating agency but was actually a strategy by the Congress (or paid press) to embarrass the Modi government.
Where it really started
As people began to share Habib’s Facebook post, they began to ask where the rumour could have emerged. Some blamed Subramanya, who while a convenient target, was only repeating Tavleen Singh’s thoughts.
On October 31, the day the Moody’s Analytics report was released, user Rati Parker posed a question on Twitter:
The writer of the Moody's "warning" to Modi is the son in law of #AwardWapsi Irfan Habib?
— rati parker (@ratigirl) October 31, 2015
But as is the nature of Twitter, the rumour began, perhaps, with people who did not read a question mark. Within minutes, people had begun to retweet the question as fact. In an hour, people transformed Syed into Habib’s grandson, then son, before finally settling on the original son-in-law of Parker’s original tweet. Five days later, that question has been retweeted 300 times.
Parker is no Twitter lightweight. She has over 25,000 followers, including Narendra Modi. At 12.21 on Thursday, she clarified that she had seen the statement posted on Facebook first, and seemed to have changed her mind.
Thanks for the clarification... i read this o FB and asked the Q on twitter...my Q went viral! @Aneesh_chandrA
— rati parker (@ratigirl) November 5, 2015
She should have perhaps looked at the timeline of Saman Habib's husband Amit Misra.
Poor Faraz Syed-- manufactured victim of Muslim Polyandry! My sympathies, my 'raqueeb', tho' I doubt whether you've even ever seen my wife.
— Amit Misra (@amit_cdri) November 4, 2015