Gay rights

Fate of Tharoor's 377 Bill makes it clear that political parties don't care about gay rights

The proposal to decriminalise gay sex wasn't even permitted to be introduced in the Lok Sabha.

Gay rights fall into a very odd place in the broader Indian discourse. Fluid gender dynamics have always been a part of Indian culture and, at least in public, there are very few politicians who are rabidly opposed to homosexuality unlike in the United States. Yet, while the latter country has seen a growing consensus on legalising gay marriage, India is still not able to muster enough legislative support to decriminalise homosexuality altogether.

On Friday, a Private Member's Bill introduced into the Lok Sabha to amend the law on gay sex was not even discussed, after Members of Parliament opposed its introduction onto the floor by 71 votes to 24.

Tharoor's bill aimed at amending Section 377 of the Indian Penal code which criminalises intercourse "against the order of nature", a provision that has been used in the past to threaten and blackmail gay people in the country, even though it rarely ends up in actual prosecutions. Tharoor's proposal suggested amending Section 377 to criminalise only non-consensual, underage or coerced sex, effectively decriminalising any voluntary gay sex between consenting adults.

But the Bill barely even reached the floor of the house. According to Tharoor's tweets, a notice of intent to oppose the introduction to the Bill was moved just as he attempted to introduce it. Reports suggested that Bharatiya Janata Party Member of Parliament Nishikant Dubey stood up to oppose the Bill and called for a division of the house to decide whether it should be taken up for debate.

This meant that those aiming to speak either in favour of decriminalising gay sex or maintaining the status quo did not get a chance to speak, and the Lok Sabha simply went on to the next order of business. Tharoor later took to Twitter to complain about the "intolerant" not even being open to debate.

But a few notes about the entire episode tells us much about our politicians' seriousness when it comes to a fundamental question of civil rights involving gay people.

*Why was it a 'Private Member's' Bill?
It is laudable that Tharoor was willing to take up such an important issue. But he is no renegade, working outside party lines. Tharoor is a senior leader in the Congress party, which has shown the political acumen to move things through Parliament even with just 45 MPs by forging alliances and consensus. Moreover, the Congress' top leaders, from President Sonia Gandhi to Vice-President Rahul Gandhi to former Finance Minister P Chidambaram just last week, have spoken against Section 377 remaining on the books. Yet it seemed like Tharoor was fighting this battle alone, truly just a private member, without the rest of the Congress supporting him. Why didn't the party back him? 

*Where was everybody?
The numbers suggest something like 95 Members of Parliament in the Lok Sabha for an important period involving Private Member Bills, in a 543-strong house. There regularly isn't quorum for Private Member's Bills, and the debate wouldn't have happened immediately. Tharoor also says there was not enough time to rally support against a notice to disallow his Bill from being introduced, but considering the relative importance of such a civil rights issue, at best doesn't the lack of numbers seem like negligence and an oversight?

*Where is the government?
Chidambaram wasn't the only one who spoke up against Section 377 last week. Current Finance Minister Arun Jaitley also said that it is "too late in the day to propound a view" that people with alternative sexual preferences should be jailed. The Bharatiya Janata Party may have a more chequered record on this front, but Jaitley could have pushed the party to embrace his views in what is clearly an important matter of civil rights.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Putting the patient first - insights for hospitals to meet customer service expectations

These emerging solutions are a fine balance between technology and the human touch.

As customers become more vocal and assertive of their needs, their expectations are changing across industries. Consequently, customer service has gone from being a hygiene factor to actively influencing the customer’s choice of product or service. This trend is also being seen in the healthcare segment. Today good healthcare service is no longer defined by just qualified doctors and the quality of medical treatment offered. The overall ambience, convenience, hospitality and the warmth and friendliness of staff is becoming a crucial way for hospitals to differentiate themselves.

A study by the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions in fact indicates that good patient experience is also excellent from a profitability point of view. The study, conducted in the US, analyzed the impact of hospital ratings by patients on overall margins and return on assets. It revealed that hospitals with high patient-reported experience scores have higher profitability. For instance, hospitals with ‘excellent’ consumer assessment scores between 2008 and 2014 had a net margin of 4.7 percent, on average, as compared to just 1.8 percent for hospitals with ‘low’ scores.

This clearly indicates that good customer service in hospitals boosts loyalty and goodwill as well as financial performance. Many healthcare service providers are thus putting their efforts behind: understanding constantly evolving customer expectations, solving long-standing problems in hospital management (such as long check-out times) and proactively offering a better experience by leveraging technology and human interface.

The evolving patient

Healthcare service customers, who comprise both the patient and his or her family and friends, are more exposed today to high standards of service across industries. As a result, hospitals are putting patient care right on top of their priorities. An example of this in action can be seen in the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. In July 2015, the hospital launched a ‘Smart OPD’ system — an integrated mobile health system under which the entire medical ecosystem of the hospital was brought together on a digital app. Patients could use the app to book/reschedule doctor’s appointments and doctors could use it to access a patient’s medical history, write prescriptions and schedule appointments. To further aid the process, IT assistants were provided to help those uncomfortable with technology.

The need for such initiatives and the evolving nature of patient care were among the central themes of the recently concluded Abbott Hospital Leadership Summit. The speakers included pundits from marketing and customer relations along with leaders in the healthcare space.

Among them was the illustrious speaker Larry Hochman, a globally recognised name in customer service. According to Mr. Hochman, who has worked with British Airways and Air Miles, patients are rapidly evolving from passive recipients of treatment to active consumers who are evaluating their overall experience with a hospital on social media and creating a ‘word-of-mouth’ economy. He talks about this in the video below.


As the video says, with social media and other public platforms being available today to share experiences, hospitals need to ensure that every customer walks away with a good experience.

The promise gap

In his address, Mr. Hochman also spoke at length about the ‘promise gap’ — the difference between what a company promises to deliver and what it actually delivers. In the video given below, he explains the concept in detail. As the gap grows wider, the potential for customer dissatisfaction increases.


So how do hospitals differentiate themselves with this evolved set of customers? How do they ensure that the promise gap remains small? “You can create a unique value only through relationships, because that is something that is not manufactured. It is about people, it’s a human thing,” says Mr. Hochman in the video below.


As Mr. Hochman and others in the discussion panel point out, the key to delivering a good customer experience is to instil a culture of empathy and hospitality across the organisation. Whether it is small things like smiling at patients, educating them at every step about their illness or listening to them to understand their fears, every action needs to be geared towards making the customer feel that they made the correct decision by getting treated at that hospital. This is also why, Dr. Nandkumar Jairam, Chairman and Group Medical Director, Columbia Asia, talked about the need for hospitals to train and hire people with soft skills and qualities such as empathy and the ability to listen.

Striking the balance

Bridging the promise gap also involves a balance between technology and the human touch. Dr. Robert Pearl, Executive Director and CEO of The Permanente Medical Group, who also spoke at the event, wrote about the example of Dr. Devi Shetty’s Narayana Health Hospitals. He writes that their team of surgeons typically performs about 900 procedures a month which is equivalent to what most U.S. university hospitals do in a year. The hospitals employ cutting edge technology and other simple innovations to improve efficiency and patient care.

The insights gained from Narayana’s model show that while technology increases efficiency of processes, what really makes a difference to customers are the human touch-points. As Mr. Hochman says, “Human touch points matter more because there are less and less of them today and are therefore crucial to the whole customer experience.”


By putting customers at the core of their thinking, many hospitals have been able to apply innovative solutions to solve age old problems. For example, Max Healthcare, introduced paramedics on motorcycles to circumvent heavy traffic and respond faster to critical emergencies. While ambulances reach 30 minutes after a call, the motorcycles reach in just 17 minutes. In the first three months, two lives were saved because of this customer-centric innovation.

Hospitals are also looking at data and consumer research to identify consumer pain points. Rajit Mehta, the MD and CEO of Max Healthcare Institute, who was a panelist at the summit, spoke of the importance of data to understand patient needs. His organisation used consumer research to identify three critical areas that needed work - discharge and admission processes for IPD patients and wait-time for OPD patients. To improve wait-time, they incentivised people to book appointments online. They also installed digital kiosks where customers could punch in their details to get an appointment quickly.

These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.