Opinion

Beyond Brexit: UK verdict reflects anxieties of those hit hard by economic inequality

This can't be viewed neatly as a battle between progressives and conservatives.

So the suspense is over – Britain has voted to leave. The margin of victory is very small, but the decision has been made.

The issues related to the referendum to remain or to leave the European Union are far more revelatory than the word “Brexit” suggests. This was more than just a choice between crazy jingoism and being progressive.

The vote to leave is being projected as a manifestation of the resistance to immigration and an uninformed understanding of the financial implications. But the debates in the British media in the weeks leading up to the vote have given a sense of other issues that the British people are also considering.

The stability of the United Kingdom, its strength as a democracy and political spaces that are still somewhat safer than the political tumult in many of the other European countries gets somewhat overlooked when the nation is viewed as a part of the EU.

Britain has been one of the most attractive countries for investment because of its stable financial institutions. In terms of real estate, it attracts a large amount of money because of the credibility of its legal system.

As part of the EU, all this is ignored – or overpowered by the concept of Europa, which at the time of its founding in 1993, appeared to be a strengthening initiative. But since then, the EU has become a place full of indebted nations, with uncomfortable diversity in their democratic cultures. The economic club is unequal and fragile

So why stay? As in all contemporary discussions, the dominant criterion used is economic power. With this decision, many are trying to predict what kind of crises could affect the global economy. But recent history has taught us that these bumps can settled fairly quickly due to the power of global communications, and because of the deep disparities in inter-region wealth and participation in the financial system.

The danger of this verdict is that some of the most outspoken leaders of Brexit have revealed xenophobic attitudes. However, there are others who see it as a way of protecting the best of Britain’s political and social culture. They also see it as an attempt to safeguard the nation’s economy. A strong British economy, they believe, can provide a better bulwark for other countries than the precarious European economy .

As anticipated, there is a clear divide in voting patterns between polling areas considered progressive, and those from areas considered working class. Commentators suggest that this inward-looking tendency is a sign of right-wing affirmation. However, this could also be a rejection of globalism, especially from who have suffered the consequences of the banditry of capital flows and the tumult of inequality.

These anxieties and viewpoints also need to be brought into the debates – not bifurcated neatly into progressive and conservative camps.

Devaki Jain is a visiting scholar at Wolfson College, Oxford.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.

Play

SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.