doping scandal

Doping, sabotage, scandal: The Narsingh Yadav saga has turned Indian wrestling into a farce

From mysterious intruders to claims of vendetta, it’s the perfect potboiler, except the biggest loser is Indian sport.

Doping, sabotage, incrimination, spiked food. No, this is not the tagline of the Hindi film industry’s next potboiler. Less than ten days before the Olympics begin, Indian sport has been dominated, not by news of Indian medal prospects, but by a tale of doping and deception which has more twists and turns than a Dan Brown novel.

Things have reached such an extent that it has become difficult to separate facts from speculation. But in case the entire furore has muddled things up somewhat, here’s a chronology of events:

  • Narsingh Pancham Yadav won the bronze medal at the World Wrestling Championships in Las Vegas. This gained India a quota place in the Rio Olympics for the same category, 74 kg freestyle wrestling.
  • Though the general trend has been to send the wrestler who won the quota place to the Olympics, Sushil Kumar, an Indian wrestling veteran and winner of bronze and silver medals at the 2008 and 2012 Olympics, disputed that claim. He sought a final bout between him and Yadav to decide India’s representative at the Olympics and took his dispute to the Delhi High Court, which ultimately ruled against him.
  • On Sunday morning, the Director General of the National Anti-Doping Agency announced that Yadav had tested positive for a banned substance, which was later known to be methandienone, a steroid for building muscle. This test had been conducted on June 25; the wrestler was provisionally suspended for the Olympics and is facing a disciplinary hearing.
  • The 26-year-old claimed that he was a victim of sabotage, which was backed by the Wrestling Federation of India. In the meanwhile, the Indian Olympic Association requested the world governing body of wrestling, United World Wrestling, to provisionally replace Yadav with 23-year-old Parveen Rana.
  • Yadav’s roommate at the Sports Authority of India Centre at Sonepat in Haryana also tested positive for doping. The Wrestling Federation of India latched onto this as more proof that there was a well-calibrated attempt to sabotage Yadav’s chances of representing the nation at Rio.
  • Yadav’s B-sample, taken on July 5, also returned a positive result.

A mysterious intruder

Now, this is where it all enters murky territory. From the beginning, Yadav has claimed that he has been a victim of conspiracy and even demanded a probe from the Central Bureau of Investigation. “Someone sabotaged my food supplements and maybe even water intake while I was training at the national camp in Sonepat ,” he said in an interview to the Times of India.

The Wrestling Federation of India have also backed him to the hilt, pointing out that Yadav had a clean record till now and that that the wrestler had complained to them in writing that a conspiracy was being hatched against him. Yadav has even filed a police complaint in Sonepat, accusing a junior wrestler of spiking his food.

Some reports, quoting anonymous sources, have emerged that mention that a person has already been identified as the one who spiked the food supplements. Supposedly, in June when Yadav was away for a training stint in Bulgaria, an unnamed-as-yet intruder infiltrated the SAI Centre in Sonepat and spiked Yadav’s food. The intruder has been described as a wrestler in the 65 kg category and the younger brother of an international wrestler. Yadav’s brother also stressed the point that the as-yet-unnamed wrestler belonged to Sushil Kumar’s akhada in Delhi, hence dragging Kumar back into the entire furore.

As of now, Kumar has been rather cryptic in his comments. He initially posted a tweet stating that respect should be earned and not demanded:

He then followed it up by posting another video where he said that he would always support fellow wrestlers:

His coach, Satpal Singh, however, rallied against the allegations that cropped up accusing them of the sabotage. “They are trying to show Satpal and his team did it, but we have nothing to do with this. Don’t level allegations against us without proof. If you have proof then come forward,” he said.

The biggest victim

Every day seems to draw new revelations. But the sobering fact that was somewhat overlooked is the impact this is having on Indian sport. There was much optimism in the air in the build-up to Rio about the fact that India were sending their largest ever contingent to the Olympics. Prospects of a medal were high and there was even an air of anticipation.

This controversy, coming as it has right on the eve of the Olympics, has dampened the prospects of not just wrestling, but Indian sport in general. One wonders what the impact of this unseemly furore has been on the rest of the Indian contingent to Rio, especially on Sandeep Tomar, Yogeshwar Dutt and the other Indian wrestlers. Even if Yadav is cleared of his doping charges, he has already wasted precious time over this matter. On top of that, the tremendous mental pressure that he has had to undergo is bound to take a toll.

And if Parveen Rava does go in his place, it would be too much to expect a good performance, considering the relentless spotlight he will be sure to be subjected to.

Right now, there are too many questions. Who was this intruder and what were his motivations? Why did Yadav not make the infiltration attempt public if he knew of it earlier? Now that both his doping samples have returned a positive result, will the NADA be convinced of the sabotage theory?

And as more questions crop up and the answers none too forthcoming, Indian wrestling prospects at the Olympics retreat ever so deeper into the distance.

For all the sports scores and reports, go to The Field.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Putting the patient first - insights for hospitals to meet customer service expectations

These emerging solutions are a fine balance between technology and the human touch.

As customers become more vocal and assertive of their needs, their expectations are changing across industries. Consequently, customer service has gone from being a hygiene factor to actively influencing the customer’s choice of product or service. This trend is also being seen in the healthcare segment. Today good healthcare service is no longer defined by just qualified doctors and the quality of medical treatment offered. The overall ambience, convenience, hospitality and the warmth and friendliness of staff is becoming a crucial way for hospitals to differentiate themselves.

A study by the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions in fact indicates that good patient experience is also excellent from a profitability point of view. The study, conducted in the US, analyzed the impact of hospital ratings by patients on overall margins and return on assets. It revealed that hospitals with high patient-reported experience scores have higher profitability. For instance, hospitals with ‘excellent’ consumer assessment scores between 2008 and 2014 had a net margin of 4.7 percent, on average, as compared to just 1.8 percent for hospitals with ‘low’ scores.

This clearly indicates that good customer service in hospitals boosts loyalty and goodwill as well as financial performance. Many healthcare service providers are thus putting their efforts behind: understanding constantly evolving customer expectations, solving long-standing problems in hospital management (such as long check-out times) and proactively offering a better experience by leveraging technology and human interface.

The evolving patient

Healthcare service customers, who comprise both the patient and his or her family and friends, are more exposed today to high standards of service across industries. As a result, hospitals are putting patient care right on top of their priorities. An example of this in action can be seen in the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital. In July 2015, the hospital launched a ‘Smart OPD’ system — an integrated mobile health system under which the entire medical ecosystem of the hospital was brought together on a digital app. Patients could use the app to book/reschedule doctor’s appointments and doctors could use it to access a patient’s medical history, write prescriptions and schedule appointments. To further aid the process, IT assistants were provided to help those uncomfortable with technology.

The need for such initiatives and the evolving nature of patient care were among the central themes of the recently concluded Abbott Hospital Leadership Summit. The speakers included pundits from marketing and customer relations along with leaders in the healthcare space.

Among them was the illustrious speaker Larry Hochman, a globally recognised name in customer service. According to Mr. Hochman, who has worked with British Airways and Air Miles, patients are rapidly evolving from passive recipients of treatment to active consumers who are evaluating their overall experience with a hospital on social media and creating a ‘word-of-mouth’ economy. He talks about this in the video below.

Play

As the video says, with social media and other public platforms being available today to share experiences, hospitals need to ensure that every customer walks away with a good experience.

The promise gap

In his address, Mr. Hochman also spoke at length about the ‘promise gap’ — the difference between what a company promises to deliver and what it actually delivers. In the video given below, he explains the concept in detail. As the gap grows wider, the potential for customer dissatisfaction increases.

Play

So how do hospitals differentiate themselves with this evolved set of customers? How do they ensure that the promise gap remains small? “You can create a unique value only through relationships, because that is something that is not manufactured. It is about people, it’s a human thing,” says Mr. Hochman in the video below.

Play

As Mr. Hochman and others in the discussion panel point out, the key to delivering a good customer experience is to instil a culture of empathy and hospitality across the organisation. Whether it is small things like smiling at patients, educating them at every step about their illness or listening to them to understand their fears, every action needs to be geared towards making the customer feel that they made the correct decision by getting treated at that hospital. This is also why, Dr. Nandkumar Jairam, Chairman and Group Medical Director, Columbia Asia, talked about the need for hospitals to train and hire people with soft skills and qualities such as empathy and the ability to listen.

Striking the balance

Bridging the promise gap also involves a balance between technology and the human touch. Dr. Robert Pearl, Executive Director and CEO of The Permanente Medical Group, who also spoke at the event, wrote about the example of Dr. Devi Shetty’s Narayana Health Hospitals. He writes that their team of surgeons typically performs about 900 procedures a month which is equivalent to what most U.S. university hospitals do in a year. The hospitals employ cutting edge technology and other simple innovations to improve efficiency and patient care.

The insights gained from Narayana’s model show that while technology increases efficiency of processes, what really makes a difference to customers are the human touch-points. As Mr. Hochman says, “Human touch points matter more because there are less and less of them today and are therefore crucial to the whole customer experience.”

Play

By putting customers at the core of their thinking, many hospitals have been able to apply innovative solutions to solve age old problems. For example, Max Healthcare, introduced paramedics on motorcycles to circumvent heavy traffic and respond faster to critical emergencies. While ambulances reach 30 minutes after a call, the motorcycles reach in just 17 minutes. In the first three months, two lives were saved because of this customer-centric innovation.

Hospitals are also looking at data and consumer research to identify consumer pain points. Rajit Mehta, the MD and CEO of Max Healthcare Institute, who was a panelist at the summit, spoke of the importance of data to understand patient needs. His organisation used consumer research to identify three critical areas that needed work - discharge and admission processes for IPD patients and wait-time for OPD patients. To improve wait-time, they incentivised people to book appointments online. They also installed digital kiosks where customers could punch in their details to get an appointment quickly.

These were just some of the insights on healthcare management gleaned from the Hospital Leadership Summit hosted by Abbott. In over 150 countries, Abbott is working with hospitals and healthcare professionals to improve the quality of health services.

To read more content on best practices for hospital leaders, visit Abbott’s Bringing Health to Life portal here.

This article was produced on behalf of Abbott by the Scroll.in marketing team and not by the Scroll.in editorial staff.