security issues

Intelligence ignored: Why is Indian army being caught napping time and again?

The latest attack in Nagrota takes the toll of security personnel killed in border-related incidents this month to 11 – over 40 in the last three months.

Once again, militants crossing over from Pakistan targeted a military camp – this time in Nagrota, a cantonment 15 km north of Jammu city, killing two officers and five soldiers, just two months after the deadly attack on a military camp in Uri. The spate of successful attacks and high military losses raise several disturbing questions about the complacency that seems to have afflicted the Indian army and security forces deployed in the state.

The militants, believed to be from the Lashkar-e-Toiba, crossed over several hours before the attack, and were dressed in Jammu and Kashmir police uniforms, confusing the army sentries outside the Officers’ Mess, according to intelligence officials.

The militants stormed into the Mess at 5 am, lobbing grenades and firing from automatic assault rifles, before entering a residential building housing soldiers and their families. A Quick Reaction Team of the local Army Artillery Regiment was pressed into service to counter the militants, which managed to rescue several women and children, but lost an officer and additional men in the attempt.

The latest attack in Nagrota takes the toll of security personnel killed in border-related incidents this month to 11 – the figure is over 40 in the last three months. While militant attacks have gone beyond Jammu and Kashmir, such as the Pathankot attack earlier this year and the Gurdaspur attack the year before, they are concentrated mostly around military or police installations, ensuring that local support for militancy is not affected in any manner.

Barring a few attacks on civilian targets in Pampore, near Srinagar, the attacks have targeted soldiers and police personnel, indicating that a clear strategy is in place to undermine the security forces.

A Complacent Army?

A little over a week ago, Lieutenant General A K Sharma, who took over as the General officer Commanding of the 16 Corps in Nagrota in October, received a detailed intelligence briefing that included inputs about an attack on a “high value” target.

Sharma, originally from the 2nd battalion of the Sikh Regiment, has spent a considerable part of his career in Kashmir on counter insurgency duties. However, while he asked the formations and units under his command to take precautionary measures, most failed to sit up and take notice.

The result was a disastrous attack.

A lot of the blame for the increasing military casualties, it appears, can now be placed on an increasingly disconnected military hierarchy. Emerging details of the September attack in Uri, that claimed 20 lives show how complacent the military has become in a state that is termed as “war zone”.

Officials in the security establishment, who were part of the post-mortem carried out of the Uri attack came up with astounding details. The attack, which took place in the early hours of September 18, showed that even basic security measures were missing. The perimeter measures were rudimentary and had chicken coop fencing with abandoned sentry points at the golf course, which had been the point of entry for the militants. Some of the sentry bunkers were found with sandbags that had dense growth sprouting through them, indicating the state of neglect. Despite specific intelligence alerts, patrolling was minimal and the threat posture underestimated.

The soldiers from the incoming Maratha battalion had not been issued weapons on the night of the attack. When the attack took place, leading to fires in the tents, the soldiers did not even have the means to retaliate. This led to a high casualties, as the units were caught napping.

Some senior officers were also found to be in denial of a possible attack. With the army coming down hard on casualties, many field commanders had become defensive, as senior police officials pointed out. “Since the attack on Uri, nearly 12 major cordon and search operations have been conducted by the army, based on specific intelligence inputs about militants. All of them came back empty handed. In four of those cases, the militants fired back and managed to get away,” a senior state police official told

Worse, while the Uri attack was attributed to the militant outfit, Jaish-e-Mohammed created by Maulana Masood Azhar, one of the the terrorists released by the Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee’s government after the hijacking of IC 814, but subsequent evidence recovered from the militants killed conclusively established that they were from the Lashkar-e-Toiba, maintain those investigating the case.

A subsequent inquiry found that the Director General of Military Operations had based his claims on an intercepted phone call of a journalist speaking to his editor, claiming that the JeM was behind the attack.

Last year, intelligence agencies had busted a militant module, which had conducted detailed surveys of the military installations in Nagrota. They found video footage of the Corps headquarters, and the installations that were attacked on November 29. This was the clearest warning that the military cantonment was on the target of militants. The Corps is one of the biggest in the Indian Army, and before the creation of the Jaipur-based South Western Command, had one of the largest areas of responsibility, that stretched from Northern Punjab right up to Poonch in the Jammu sector.

The area around Akhnur, with a solitary bridge over the Chenab river is considered a particularly sensitive and vulnerable area that winds its way up through Palanwala, before the international border converts into the Line of Control. The area has two army divisions, the 10th Division in Akhnur and the 25th Division in Rajouri, as well as the Romeo Force, a Division sized counter insurgency formation, dedicated for operations north of Akhnur.

Surgical strikes nullified

In April 2014, just before the general elections, the Bharatiya Janata Party President Amit Shah addressing an election rally claimed that once their party took power at the centre under Narendra Modi, the borders would be safe and no one would dare to enter India. However, the gap between political rhetoric and reality has been steadily increasing. What has also added to the complacency of the military is its increasing use for political brownie points.

Soon after the “surgical strikes” by Indian Army’s Special Forces, defence minister Manohar Parrikar had credited the “teachings of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh” for the action. He had also promised a “tit-for-tat” action against future attacks during a TV interview, but had not spelt out a clear strategy. However, despite the “surgical attacks” and the demonetisation, strikes against military installations continue unabated. Worse, government claims of past attacks have also been contradicted. For instance, while Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh had claimed that there were “six terrorists” in the Pathankot air base attack earlier this year, the government told Parliament on November 29 that there were only “four terrorists”.

Such confusion in the top political ranks of the government does not inspire much confidence among the security forces, be it the military or the intelligence agencies and police forces. Security analysts are clear that more terror attacks are in the offing, and unless the political leadership gets its act together quickly, India will have to lose more of its soldiers in this unending conflict.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

How sustainable farming practices can secure India's food for the future

India is home to 15% of the world’s undernourished population.

Food security is a pressing problem in India and in the world. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO), it is estimated that over 190 million people go hungry every day in the country.

Evidence for India’s food challenge can be found in the fact that the yield per hectare of rice, one of India’s principal crops, is 2177 kgs per hectare, lagging behind countries such as China and Brazil that have yield rates of 4263 kgs/hectare and 3265 kgs/hectare respectively. The cereal yield per hectare in the country is also 2,981 kgs per hectare, lagging far behind countries such as China, Japan and the US.

The slow growth of agricultural production in India can be attributed to an inefficient rural transport system, lack of awareness about the treatment of crops, limited access to modern farming technology and the shrinking agricultural land due to urbanization. Add to that, an irregular monsoon and the fact that 63% of agricultural land is dependent on rainfall further increase the difficulties we face.

Despite these odds, there is huge potential for India to increase its agricultural productivity to meet the food requirements of its growing population.

The good news is that experience in India and other countries shows that the adoption of sustainable farming practices can increase both productivity and reduce ecological harm.

Sustainable agriculture techniques enable higher resource efficiency – they help produce greater agricultural output while using lesser land, water and energy, ensuring profitability for the farmer. These essentially include methods that, among other things, protect and enhance the crops and the soil, improve water absorption and use efficient seed treatments. While Indian farmers have traditionally followed these principles, new technology now makes them more effective.

For example, for soil enhancement, certified biodegradable mulch films are now available. A mulch film is a layer of protective material applied to soil to conserve moisture and fertility. Most mulch films used in agriculture today are made of polyethylene (PE), which has the unwanted overhead of disposal. It is a labour intensive and time-consuming process to remove the PE mulch film after usage. If not done, it affects soil quality and hence, crop yield. An independently certified biodegradable mulch film, on the other hand, is directly absorbed by the microorganisms in the soil. It conserves the soil properties, eliminates soil contamination, and saves the labor cost that comes with PE mulch films.

The other perpetual challenge for India’s farms is the availability of water. Many food crops like rice and sugarcane have a high-water requirement. In a country like India, where majority of the agricultural land is rain-fed, low rainfall years can wreak havoc for crops and cause a slew of other problems - a surge in crop prices and a reduction in access to essential food items. Again, Indian farmers have long experience in water conservation that can now be enhanced through technology.

Seeds can now be treated with enhancements that help them improve their root systems. This leads to more efficient water absorption.

In addition to soil and water management, the third big factor, better seed treatment, can also significantly improve crop health and boost productivity. These solutions include application of fungicides and insecticides that protect the seed from unwanted fungi and parasites that can damage crops or hinder growth, and increase productivity.

While sustainable agriculture through soil, water and seed management can increase crop yields, an efficient warehousing and distribution system is also necessary to ensure that the output reaches the consumers. According to a study by CIPHET, Indian government’s harvest-research body, up to 67 million tons of food get wasted every year — a quantity equivalent to that consumed by the entire state of Bihar in a year. Perishables, such as fruits and vegetables, end up rotting in store houses or during transportation due to pests, erratic weather and the lack of modern storage facilities. In fact, simply bringing down food wastage and increasing the efficiency in distribution alone can significantly help improve food security. Innovations such as special tarpaulins, that keep perishables cool during transit, and more efficient insulation solutions can reduce rotting and reduce energy usage in cold storage.

Thus, all three aspects — production, storage, and distribution — need to be optimized if India is to feed its ever-growing population.

One company working to drive increased sustainability down the entire agriculture value chain is BASF. For example, the company offers cutting edge seed treatments that protect crops from disease and provide plant health benefits such as enhanced vitality and better tolerance for stress and cold. In addition, BASF has developed a biodegradable mulch film from its ecovio® bioplastic that is certified compostable – meaning farmers can reap the benefits of better soil without risk of contamination or increased labor costs. These and more of the company’s innovations are helping farmers in India achieve higher and more sustainable yields.

Of course, products are only one part of the solution. The company also recognizes the importance of training farmers in sustainable farming practices and in the safe use of its products. To this end, BASF engaged in a widespread farmer outreach program called Samruddhi from 2007 to 2014. Their ‘Suraksha Hamesha’ (safety always) program reached over 23,000 farmers and 4,000 spray men across India in 2016 alone. In addition to training, the company also offers a ‘Sanrakshan® Kit’ to farmers that includes personal protection tools and equipment. All these efforts serve to spread awareness about the sustainable and responsible use of crop protection products – ensuring that farmers stay safe while producing good quality food.

Interested in learning more about BASF’s work in sustainable agriculture? See here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.