understanding patriotism

Of martyrs and anthems: The Indian conception of nationalism borrows heavily from religion

In nationalism, the nation itself plays the part of god.

Earlier this month, the Telegraph carried a report on a seemingly innocuous matter: the terminology used for Indian soldiers killed in combat. The Union government had clarified in the Lok Sabha that it does not use the term “martyr” to describe a soldier who had died in action, the article said.

That the government does not use this term should be obvious to anyone who knows what the word originally meant. Martyr, from a Greek word that literally means witness, refers to a Christian killed for his belief in Jesus. The term gained prominence in the first few centuries of the Christian church in Rome, where the religion often faced persecution at the hands of Roman authorities. Yet, it is used widely in Indian English to refer to Indian armed personnel killed battling militants, say in Assam or Kashmir.

This theological cross-pollination is not limited to the word “martyr”. The Supreme Court, in November, made it mandatory for the national anthem to be played in movie theatres before every film screening and barred the audience from sitting. “All present in the hall are obliged to stand up to show respect to the national anthem,” its order read.

The concept of a national anthem comes to India from Europe, where it was taken from Christian hymnody – songs sung in churches as part of the service. The original meaning of anthem itself refers to a composition set to sacred music. Naturally, then, in this mode of spirituality, standing is a mark of respect – church hymns are sung standing up. However, there is nothing universal about respect and standing up. A kirtan or a qawwali is performed sitting down and, one would assume, the singer or the audience means no disrespect. That standing up equals respect for the Supreme Court shows how closely linked the concept of a national anthem is to sacral hymnody in the West. Here, as in the case of martyr, without realising it, Indian nationalists are importing elements of organised religion to give shape to their conception of community.

Nationalism as religion

The resemblance between nationalism and faith is not unique to India. British political scientist Frank Wright, an expert on Ireland, said, “Nationalisms are not merely ‘like’ religions – they are religions.”

Similarly, Carolyn Marvin and David Ingle argued in their article Blood Sacrifice and the Nation: Revisiting Civil Religion: “Nationalism is the most powerful religion in the United States.” They wrote, “Structurally speaking, nationalism mirrors sectarian belief systems such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam and others that are more conventionally labeled as religious.”

This, at least in the way the word religion is used in lay language, would come as a surprise to most people. Nationalism is conventionally not seen as religion in the way Islam or Sikhism is. This, though, is simply a matter of convention. Nationalism satisfies any description of religion. This is how Emile Durkheim, the founder of the discipline sociology, defined faith:

“A religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite people into one single moral community called a Church, all those who adhere to them.”

Sacred symbols

Sacred things, in conventionally labelled religion, are totems or symbols. Think of the position of the cross in Christianity, the number 786 in South Asian Islam, or the swastika in Hinduism. The best example of a sacred object in nationalism is the national flag. American cultural geographer Wilbur Zelinsky wrote that the modern state has made its flags into “literally holy objects, the equivalent of the cross or the communion wafer”.

The most obvious example of a sacred thing is god – although the figure is not necessary to make up a religion per se. Buddhism is silent on the concept of a god and yet, was the world’s first missionary faith. In nationalism, the nation itself plays the part of god. In his book National Identity, British historical sociologist Anthony Smith pointed out that nationalism’s “deity is the nation itself”. This, in India, is not too difficult to see. Indian nationalism often fuses the Hindu conception of a female shakti deity to literally imagine a national goddess, Bharat Mata.

Bharat Mata, the Hindu deity who personifies India.
Bharat Mata, the Hindu deity who personifies India.

One of the most remarkable scared objects held by nationalism is the geography of the country. Earlier, political units were anchored in centres and metropoles. The Roman Empire was the Roman Empire as long as the city of Rome held. That its border fluctuated wildly did not really matter. In pre-modern times, land was exchanged between states in a rather casual fashion. This is near impossible today, given the sacred status of land in modern nationalism. Today, nations will be ready to pay immensely in terms of lives and money to maintain the integrity of their map. This is true even for seemingly pointless strips of land – think the Falklands war between Argentina and the United Kingdom, or the Siachen conflict closer home.

The map itself is held up as a remembrance of the sacredness of land and its image is drilled into the minds of children. In India, incorrect depictions of the country’s map are a legally punishable offence. The fact that the official Indian map itself does not correspond to actual territories held by the Indian Union means that, ironically, publishing a geographically accurate Indian map can land a citizen in jail – a rather incredible analogy to how modern religions have used concepts like blasphemy to police information.

Beliefs and practices

The most prominent practice related to the scared things in religion is praying. We have already seen how the act of singing a national anthem mimics the act of worship using hymnody. Other practices such as religious festivals are replicated in nationalism using parades, marches and rallies. Specific days – in India, most popularly, Independence Day – are chosen for groups of people to pay their respects to the sacred object of the flag by hoisting it, much in the manner that a congregational prayer on Eid or a Christmas mass pays its respects to the sacred object of Allah/God. In the context of the United States, Carolyn Marvin and David Ingle wrote:

“Curious liturgical forms have been devised for ‘saluting’ the flag, for ‘dipping’ the flag, for ‘lowering’ the flag and for ‘hosting’ the flag. Men bare their heads when the flag passes by; and in praise of the flags poets write odes and children sing hymns. In America, young people are ranged in serried rows and required to recite daily, with hierophantic voice and ritualistic gesture, the mystical formula: ‘I pledge allegiance to the flag and to the country for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all’.”

So sacred is the Indian national flag that, like Sanskrit in Hinduism, only a select few were allowed to use it till very recently. And even today, insults to sacred symbols such as the flag, map and national anthem are a legally punishable offence under a Union law.

On Republic Day 2015, the vice-president's act of not saluting the Indian flag created a furore. His office later clarified that in keeping with protocol, he did not offer a salute as he was not the principal dignitary.

Power of community

Community is really the central point of religion, which has historically been a tool for social cohesion. Religions like Islam and Christianity have well-defined groups such as the Ummah and Christendom. Religions think of their communities as supreme and other identities as either spurious or subordinate. To take an Indian example, in his famous poem Jawaab-e-Shikwaa, the Urdu poet Iqbal asked sarcastically: “Yūn to sayyad bhī ho Mirzā bhī ho Afghān bhī ho/ tum sabhī kuchh ho, batā’o to Musalmān bhī ho?” (You are a Sayyid, Mirza, Afghan, you are everything, but are you a Muslim?) This marked out Muslim to be the only true identity.

This is frequently repeated in Indian nationalism, where identities such as religion or language are seen to be below the Indian identity. In the 1959 Bollywood movie Dhool ke Phool, another Urdu poet, Sahir Ludhianvi, would write, “Tū Hindū banegā na Musalmān banegā, insān kī aulād hai, insān banegā.” (You will neither grow up to be Hindu nor Muslim; you’re the child of a human and that’s what you’ll grow up to be). Like Iqbal had deprecated any identity other than Muslim, Ludhianvi did the same for the Indian identity.

Community is central to the idea of nationalism and is such a powerful force that, like other religions, it is seen to be a legitimate cause to give up your life and/or take lives. In his seminal work on the origins of nationalism, Imagined Communities, Benedict Anderson wrote:

“It [the nation] is imagined as a community, because, regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation that may prevail in each, the nation is always conceived as a deep, horizontal comradeship. Ultimately it is this fraternity that makes it possible, over the past two centuries, for so many millions of people, not so much to kill, as willingly to die for such limited imaginings.”

Death is really the one factor that sets religion apart from any other human group. But why would anyone, logically, die? What’s in it for him? Classical religion gets around this conundrum by proposing a theology of the afterlife, a place where Christian martyrs and Muslim shaheeds (both words mean witness) enjoy an exalted existence, thus making the sacrifice of their lives – otherwise a rather irrational act – worth it. Nationalism also promises a kind of eternity to anyone who lays down their life for their community. Soldiers dying in action are held up as heroes and promised an afterlife in the collective memory of the nation, as in this popular Hindi couplet by Jagdamba Prasad Mishra:

“Shahīdoñ ke chitā’oñ par lageñge har baras mele
Watan par mar mitne wāloñ kā bas yahī ab bāqī nishāñ hogā.”

(The corpses of martyrs will be the venue for carnivals every year; for those who die for the nation, this will be their eternal legacy).

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.