Artists storm New York's Guggenheim Museum to protest conditions of workers at its Abu Dhabi site

The Guggenheim Museum is opening a wing in Abu Dhabi. But artists claim that the workers constructing the building on the Island of Happiness are living in deplorable conditions.

Even as the Indian authorities attempt to deal with news that more than 500 Indian construction workers had died in Qatar since 2012, several artists stormed New York's Guggenheim Museum on Saturday to protest what they described as "the deplorable living and working conditions" of migrant workers in Abu Dhabi engaged in building branches of several international museums in the emirate.

The protestors, who belong to a group called G.U.L.F., began to shout slogans at the blast of a bugle. They tossed pamphlets at visitors and chanted, "Who is building the Guggenheim Abu Dhabi?"

They are attempting to focus attention on the conditions of 15,000 workers – a significant number of them from India – who are living in labour camps as they construct a cultural district on Saadiyat island in Abu Dhabi. One of the structures that will be built there is a franchise of the Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation and Museum. A branch of the Louvre is also being constructed, as is the Sheikh Zayed National Museum, in collaboration with the British Museum.
"Workers spend up to 12 hours per day on their worksites, often in extreme conditions of heat and humidity with temperatures often exceeding 100 degrees Fahrenheit (38 degrees Celsius)," said a report by Human Rights Watch.

Just as alarming, they said, were the contractual obligations under which the workers have been employed. Most of the workers -- the bulk of whom were from South Asia -- take out huge loans to pay employment agencies to get them these jobs, even though recruitment fees are illegal under the law of the United Arab Emirates.

“The basic problem is that the way the system is designed, the worker remains in debt for several years,” said Ashok Sukumaran, co-founder of Indian artists collective CAMP and a member of Gulf Labour, which is sympathetic to G.U.L.F. “A worker is bound to that job until he or she finds something else, which would involve paying more money to somebody else and continuing that debt.”

Workers from India borrow anything from Rs 70,000 to Rs 1 lakh to middlemen who arrange for their travel to and employment at a company in a Gulf country, said Sukumaran,  who has visited Saadiyat three times.

"Because they are often already highly indebted upon arrival in the UAE, many workers have virtually no power to bargain over the terms of the official UAE work contracts their corporate employers require them to sign upon arrival in the UAE," said Human Rights Watch. "After signing these contracts, many of the workers on Saadiyat Island discovered that their salaries in the UAE were as little as 50 per cent of what the agencies in their home countries, and that their overtime pay, vacation days and other benefits were also greatly reduced." They are not allowed to form unions and have no platforms on which to raise their concerns.

Gulf Labour, a collective of artists and students across the world, want an independent organisation to monitor the status of construction workers at Saadiyat island, which means Island of Happiness in Arabic. The site of the flagship project of a semi-government-run Tourism Development & Investment Company, which wants to transform Abu Dhabi into a glamorous counterpart of neighbouring Dubai.

The project will cover 20 square kilometres and will contain luxury housing, and beach resorts in addition to the cultural institutions.

“These will be the largest museums in the world,” said Shaina Anand, another co-founder of CAMP, who is also associated with Gulf Labour. “We can’t keep blaming the trade system so we decided to check on Guggenheim directly. Better labour standards is not much to ask for considering the scale of these buildings.”

Anand and Sukumaran are also signatories to a 2011 petition that developed into Gulf Labour. Signed by 156 artists across the world, the petition asked for Guggenheim to ensure that fair labour practices were maintained by the companies building its site. It now has over 10,000 supporters who say they will not share their art with the new museum unless it ensures high labour standards while being constructed.

“Artists as a group have the leverage to tell Guggenheim that they need to improve working conditions or we will boycott them,” Anand said. “In the end, curators working for Abu Dhabi will want a regional collection of art. If artists from South Asia do not participate, what will they do?”

Richard Armstrong, director of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, while emphasising that construction on the Abu Dhabi site had not yet begun, told Scroll.in that the museum authorities are “engaged in ongoing, serious discussions with our most senior colleagues in Abu Dhabi regarding the issues of workers’ rights. As global citizens, we share the concerns about human rights and fair labour practices and continue to be committed to making progress on these issues.”

However, according to Sukumaran, the camps housing the workers who will build these structures are located near a sewage treatment facility, far removed from public view. They are inaccessible to the general public, and guards at checkpoints turn away casual visitors, he said.

Two weeks ago, Anand and Sukumaran, along with other migrant rights organisations in India including Society for Labour and Development  and Alternative Law Forum, sent a memorandum  to the Ministry of Overseas Employment and to the Protector General of Emigrants to look into potentially exploitative practices at the site. They expect a reply later this week.

They want to address recruitment practices in India so that potential emigrants are not forced into an exploitative system. They also want the Indian government to take responsibility for its citizens abroad, something it failed to do in mid-February when reports of the Qatar deaths emerged.

Said Sukumaran, “This is not to say similar things don’t happen in rural India or Bombay, but this is a specifically designed structural system with a strong legal framework to support it. The system is implemented strictly. That is why we are worried about this.”
We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.