Legal reform

Why many states are using the 1923 Goondas Act to curb digital piracy

The music industry has discovered that amending the age-old statute makes it easier to get the police to take action against people who violate copyright laws.

In mid-July, the Karnataka legislature amended its Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, popularly called the Goondas Act, to bring digital pirates under its purview. Two weeks later, the law returned to the news. The Bengaluru police announced that it would charge two men accused of raping a schoolgirl under the same statute.

So what is this act that seems to be able to tackle both illegal music downloaders and sexual offenders?

The Goondas Act, first enacted in 1923 in Bengal, lives on in nine states in India, one in Pakistan and across Bangladesh. The law was initially intended to prevent habitual defenders from repeating their crimes through preventive detention. Typical versions of the law today allow the police to keep people in jail for up to a year, with reviews every three months.

It might seem excessive for people guilty of downloading ebooks.

Tamil Nadu takes the lead 

Tamil Nadu was the first state in 2004 to bring digital pirates under the ambit of its version of the Goondas Act. Maharashtra followed suit in 2009. Andhra Pradesh in 2010 suggested that it would also like to amend its Goondas Act to include video piracy.

These are just states that already have Goondas Acts.

Since last year, the Bengali music industry has been lobbying for the West Bengal government to introduce their own version of the Goondas Act and make music piracy a primary offence. Punjab’s music industry has been demanding this since 2006.

“Stricter laws on software piracy only help the big fish in the software, publications and music markets, which typically lobby with governments to increase their profits,” said Prashant Mali, a cyber-law advocate. “But clubbing technology-related laws and the Goonda Act is a bad idea with disproportionate punishment.”

Despite the overlap with the centre’s Copyright Act and the Information Technology Act, states have been the ones pushing for stricter controls on digital piracy. There is a simple explanation for this.

“When the companies whose digital assets are being infringed upon want to take criminal action, they have to rely on police,” said Pavan Duggal, a Supreme Court lawyer. “Since the management of police is a state subject, it makes sense for them to push for more powers to the police to cover acts relating to digital piracy.”

Hold-all act

The Goondas Act is just the sort of hold-all statute that can cover such offences without requiring too much legislative mobilisation. In a typical iteration of the act, a person can be charged if the state suspects that he or she is planning to conduct an illegal activity. This hypothetically means that anyone who possesses a pirated digital copy of any film, book, image or song – or ever used any social media – is liable to see the inside of a jail cell for a year.

“The Goondas Act was essentially invoked against people who were history-sheeters and suspects when the police couldn't find evidence to put them away for a crime they had already committed,” said Sanjay Hegde, a Supreme Court lawyer and former standing counsel of Karnataka for over a decade. “As long as the act applied to bootleggers and rowdies, the public applauded. Now that its reach is being expanded to people like us, people are pointing out its propensity to being misused.”

In 2010, Tamil Nadu admitted that it had imprisoned 675 people under the Goondas Act, its highest number since 2002.

Expanding footprint

The southern state had reignited interest in the act with its controversial 2004 amendment. The law had dipped out of use almost entirely after Independence. In 1960, the Supreme Court struck down Madhya Pradesh’s Central Provinces and Berar Goondas Act of 1946 for having an unreasonable definition of the term “goonda”.

After that, there was a decade-long lull before a host of states, starting with Uttar Pradesh in 1970, began to enact their own versions of the Goondas Act. By the end of the '80s, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and all south Indian states except Kerala had their versions of these acts.

“Those took off after the Emergency, where you had MISA [Maintenance of Internal Security Act] and the PDA [Preventive Detention Act],” said Hegde. “These laws were replicated at the state level. You might have safeguards put into the law, but they are actually not complied with and judicial redress is also not available.”

“The problem is that we are going towards a nanny state,” said Hegde. “Every government department wants to control everything a citizen does. They want teeth, but they can’t think of anything beyond detention.”

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.