Restricted access

Four reasons why banning social media on campus is a bad idea

Aligarh Muslim University is latest institution to limit internet use.

The students and staff of Aligarh Muslim University were left befuddled and angry on Sunday when they could not log onto Facebook. Every time someone tried to access the site during working hours on the university internet system, the screen went blank. When asked, the university authorities admitted to blocking social media access on campus. They did so, they said, because it “distracted” students.

“The ban is in the interest of the university,” Rahat Abrar, the university’s public relations officer told The Times of India. “It will protect the interests of students and teachers. There were complaints that students were getting distracted by it.”

This is not the first time an embargo has been placed on social media on campus. Across the country, universities are freely imposing such bans, citing “distraction” and “congested networks”.

But it is debatable whether these injunctions are effective. It is also questionable if the idea does any good. To most people, the proscriptions are misplaced. They smack of some education official's ignorance of the way the internet works and of the benefits brought by social media.

1. Access continues

Most students remain unperturbed by the bans since they have figured how to bypass the blocks and access their favourite websites. IIT Delhi, for instance, banned internet access from 1 am to 6 am, but its students can be still found online late at night.

“We are allowed to use our own dongles and mobile internet,” said Abhishek Gupta, an IIT Delhi alumnus. "Those who want campus internet go to research labs, etc. and use it anyway."

Banaras Hindu University students reportedly use virtual private networks or anonymous browsers, such as Tor, to access the websites blocked by the authorities.

2. Barrier to information and interaction

Social media helps build connections and improve interaction with users around the world. Not being able to tap into this has incensed the faculty at the Aligarh Muslim University.

“This is unfortunate,” Aftab Alam, secretary of the AMU teachers’ association told The Times of India. “Facebook is not just about entertainment, it is also information. It serves as alternative media, as another source of information. The ban has affected our right to know and share.”

Students point out that the bans obstruct communication among classmates and project teams collaborating through Facebook groups and pages. “The most popular mode of interacting with classmates and sharing information about exam material and seminars is Facebook,” said Veda Nadendla, a student at the Madras School of Social Work.

3. Hinders promotion of campus events

Students use social media heavily these days to promote campus events, such as cultural festivals and seminars. The process costs nothing and is very effective. Banning social media or the internet makes publicising programmes difficult, say students from the University of Delhi.

“Our political science festival Chanakaya depends on the participation of students from other colleges" said Meghana Rathore, a student of political science at Delhi University’s Shaheed Bhagat Singh College. "The only way to invite them is through social media. We keep updating information on Facebook and Twitter. A ban on social media will cause a big drop in footfalls."

4. Only a cosmetic measure

Aligarh Muslim University students say the social media ban will not increase anyone’s efficiency. “The teachers who want to waste time online will find a way,” said law student Fawaz Shaheen. “The ban is only a cosmetic measure to enforce authority. We do not worry much about it.”

There has surely been no change in the productivity of the students of IIT Guwahati, where internet access is barred in hostel rooms from 8 am to 5 pm on weekdays. Students say they still miss classes. “The internet is available on the campus and we can always go out of the hostel to have fun," said MTech student Ramyani Chakrabarty. "Not having internet does not stop us from missing classes. Sometimes, we just need a break.”

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.