Media Matters

How the media lapped up rumours on compensation for 1984 anti-Sikh riots victims

Editors have chosen to keep quiet about the Modi government's trickery.

This is one government leak that has not caused any storm in the media. No questions have been raised about how it happened or who was responsible. Normally, when misinformation comes via the establishment, the press does not take too kindly to it being collectively tricked into believing a blatant falsehood. But what happened on October 30 was quite remarkable.

On that day, reporters who cover the Union Ministry of Home Affairs were suddenly informed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government had cleared the allocation of an additional Rs 5 lakh as compensation for each of the victims of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. The news was conveyed over the phone to a few reporters by a home ministry official and it spread like wildfire. Those who later sought confirmation from the home ministry were told in no uncertain terms that the information was authentic. This convinced many editors that it was worthy to be taken as front page lead of newspapers and given top billing on news channels.

The timing of the “official leak” could not have been better – a day before the 30th anniversary of the anti-Sikh riots on October 31. Newspapers and television channels, which had been building up a bank of stories on the ghastly pogrom in Delhi and other places, suddenly found a lead story to hang their package on. And television discussions on the riots now had a new angle – the Rs 5 lakh compensation from the Union government. As the news broke, the Congress, embarrassed about the riots because of the involvement of several of its leaders, felt the government had outsmarted it.

It was not news that could be missed. Or you missed it, as one reporter put it, at your own peril.

Scepticism discarded

Of course, there were the sceptics who wondered why no official press statement was forthcoming from the home ministry. Others found it strange that such an “announcement” had come five days after the Election Commission notified by-polls in three assembly constituencies in Delhi. Did the additional relief for riot victims then not violate the model code of conduct? Such questions should have, under normal circumstances, curbed the enthusiasm shown in newsrooms, but on that day they did not.

According to a television journalist, the manner in which the whisper campaign gained momentum was amazing. “No one was saying that sources were telling them that a relief package had been decided upon,” he said in retrospect. “They were saying that the home ministry was officially confirming it. This was never a speculative story with question marks when that is what it was.” Three officials in the ministry he contacted told him the information was correct. Another reporter on the beat said he was informed that “this was confirmed news and that he could go ahead with the story”.

The pressure on reporters to file the report was such that many simply joined the herd. “Everyone had the story so you simply had to go with what the ministry officials were telling you. In any case, no one was denying it,” is how a journalist explained his position.

People hoodwinked

The Election Commission was forced to write to the ministry since it “did not come across any denial from the government in the electronic media” although it added “it cannot be denied that (the news) gave an unmistakable impression to the electorate that a decision to the above effect (the compensation package) was in fact taken by the government”. Incidentally, the poll panel had communicated its displeasure to the ministry on October 31, although it took several days for the news of the home ministry denial to appear in sections of the media. Some publications and channels even chose to ignore it.

Very clearly, whoever planted the story achieved his or her objective. The average citizen in the national capital believes Rs 5 lakh has been graciously awarded to the riot victims by the Modi sarkar. This message, now out, will not be erased easily. It will at least sustain till the assembly elections in Delhi are over, helping the BJP (Polls are shortly due after the dissolution of the assembly in November).

Lesson for journalists

There is of course a lesson in this for journalists. Whisper campaigns should not be taken seriously and confirmation of any important decision will always come through a formal public statement or an official release. Otherwise, a story coming from unnamed officials, however senior they may be, remains in the realm of speculation. The compensation story belonged to this realm and would have gone better with a headline suggesting that the Centre was considering a relief package for 1984 riot victims.

The compensation tamasha happened at a time when Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been asking his ministers, MPs and bureaucrats to be circumspect in sharing information with the press. “Work hard, don’t holiday, avoid media leaks” is reportedly the mantra that he spelt out. Of course, he said nothing against selective government friendly leaks.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Bringing your parents into the digital fold can be a rewarding experience

Contrary to popular sentiment, being the tech support for your parents might be a great use of your time and theirs.

If you look up ‘Parents vs technology’, you’ll be showered with a barrage of hilariously adorable and relatable memes. Half the hilarity of these memes sprouts from their familiarity as most of us have found ourselves in similar troubleshooting situations. Helping a parent understand and operate technology can be trying. However, as you sit, exasperated, deleting the gazillion empty folders that your mum has accidentally made, you might be losing out on an opportunity to enrich her life.

After the advent of technology in our everyday personal and work lives, parents have tried to embrace the brand-new ways to work and communicate with a bit of help from us, the digital natives. And while they successfully send Whatsapp messages and make video calls, a tremendous amount of unfulfilled potential has fallen through the presumptuous gap that lies between their ambition and our understanding of their technological needs.

When Priyanka Gothi’s mother retired after 35 years of being a teacher, Priyanka decided to create a first of its kind marketplace that would leverage the experience and potential of retirees by providing them with flexible job opportunities. Her Hong Kong based novel venture, Retired, Not Out is reimagining retirement by creating a channel through which the senior generation can continue to contribute to the society.

Our belief is that tech is highly learnable. And learning doesn’t stop when you graduate from school. That is why we have designed specific programmes for seniors to embrace technology to aid their personal and professional goals.

— Priyanka Gothi, Founder & CEO, Retired Not Out

Ideas like Retired Not Out promote inclusiveness and help instil confidence in a generation that has not grown up with technology. A positive change in our parent’s lives can be created if we flip the perspective on the time spent helping them operate a laptop and view it as an exercise in empowerment. For instance, by becoming proficient in Microsoft Excel, a senior with 25 years of experience in finance, could continue to work part time as a Finance Manager. Similarly, parents can run consultation blogs or augment their hobbies and continue to lead a fulfilling and meaningful life.

Advocating the same message, Lenovo’s new web-film captures the void that retirement creates in a person’s life, one that can be filled by, as Lenovo puts it, gifting them a future.


Depending on the role technology plays, it can either leave the senior generation behind or it can enable them to lead an ambitious and productive life. This festive season, give this a thought as you spend time with family.

To make one of Lenovo’s laptops a part of the family, see here.

This article was produced on behalf of Lenovo by the marketing team and not by the editorial staff.