Film preview

'Sulemani Keeda' is a charming slacker comedy about struggling writers with Bollywood dreams

Amit Masurkar’s wry comedy opens on December 5.

There are films about life, love, crime and death, there are films about films, and then there are films about the trauma of making films.

In Mumbai, where more projects are shelved than completed, the agony of not being able to get a project off the ground is especially acute – and inspirational. Indie films such as Missed Call (2005) and The Untitled Karthik Krishnan Project (2010) have exposed some of Bollywood’s worst-kept secrets: aspiring filmmakers need a godfather or two to get ahead, nepotism rules, formula trumps originality, writers are treated like dirt, promises are made to be broken, and the nerds rarely get the girls.

Amit Masurkar’s Sulemani Keeda explores one writing pair's anguish at not being able to get a screenplay produced. Dulal and Mainak have yet not reached the legendary status of the renowned collaborators Salim and Javed,though they would like to. The roommates hawk their screenplay to several producers (including Mahesh Bhatt and Anil Sharma, sportingly playing themselves), only to be told that they don’t have what it takes to make a Hindi movie.

The young men also meet and try to impress women at various house parties. Dulal (Naveen Kasturia) seems to get lucky when he meets Ruma (Aditi Vasudev), a gentle and generous soul who sees past his awkwardness and befriends him.

Mainak (Mayank Tewari), meanwhile, is a blithe spirit who tries his luck everywhere.

Spoofing Bollywood

Billed as a slacker comedy, Masurkar’s wry, engaging and nicely observed debut was shown at the Mumbai Film Festival last year, and is being released through PVR Cinemas’ Director’s Rare label on December 5. Made for Rs 25-odd lakh, Sulemani Keeda is a far more convincing and honest insider spoof of Bollywood than the recently released Happy Ending.

Masurkar’s own cinematic adventure hasn’t ended too badly either, but the journey to the cinemas hasn’t been easy. The reactions he got when he showed the movie to various leading studios was similar to the feedback Dulal and Mainak get when they try to hardsell their dream project.

“There was a pattern to the response – creative teams and the bosses of studios would love the film, while the marketing teams would veto it by saying it could not be marketed since it didn’t have any stars,” Masurkar said. (It is, of course, entirely possible that the studios were playing one of the oldest games in the book – the good cop bad cop routine.)

Some of the reactions came at the level of the episode-driven script itself. "When I wrote the script and showed it to people, the first thing they said was, where is the story, it is only a series of events,” Masurkar said. “People in Bollywood are trained to think about films as being pre- or post-interval.”

Sulemani Keeda (it roughly translates into A Pain in the Posterior) might be set in the glamour-struck of Hindi film entertainment, but it could be “a very universal people about two people struggling in a big city in any industry”, Masurkar added. He picked the movies as a backdrop because of his own experience as a writer for television shows over the past decade, including sketches for the spoof series The Great Indian Comedy Show.

The characters are partly imaginary and partly fictionalised versions of people that he has met over the years. For instance, the outlandish Indian Alain Delon wannabe Gonzo, who is the only one who takes the writer duo seriously, is lurking somewhere in Mumbai.

Sulemani Keeda is refreshingly relaxed about the angst levels felt by its characters. They do worry about their professional prospects, and they are somewhat behind on their rent. Dulal, in particular, is a brooder, given to lugubrious statements about the future of the human race that never fails to cause Ruma to break into a grin. Tamil cinematographer and director Rajiv Menon had elegantly poked fun at directorial angst in his Kandukondain Kandukondain (2000), in which Ajit’s character gives up trying to make an original film and instead pitches a remake of Speed with a major twist – the lead character is a woman rather than a man.

Sulemani Keeda displays a similar light touch in dealing with its characters’ misadventures. “I don’t like it when people romanticise their struggles,” Masurkar said. “Most people who claim to have struggled so much haven’t actually. If so many people slept on railway platforms while trying to find work, then you would find the best writers there.”

The whole idea in Sulemani Keeda was to put the word "struggle" on a pedestal, the 33 year-old filmmaker added. “The film is not as much about making the film as about what these guys actually want to do in life,” he said. “It’s not as though these guys want to make an art film either – the story is balanced about their own tastes and interests. I was also interested in the dynamic between collaborators. The characters are sharing an apartment, a dream, and tee shirts – is it possible that two people can have the exact same goal? And what if one of them grows out of it?”

The easy banter between the characters, especially Dulal and Mainak, flowed out of the fact that Masurkar wrote the script for Kasturia and Tewari, keeping in mind their speech patterns and behavioural tics. “Naveen and Mayank were pre-cast, in a sense.” he said. “At first I was trying to cast someone else other than Mayank, but then I figured out, why should I cast anybody else to play Mayank when I have him?”

Kasturia, with whom Masurkar had rented an apartment at one point, alerted him about Aditi Vasudev, who gives a sparkling performance as Ruma. Vasudev had played the role of Rishi Kapoor’s daughter in Do Dooni Chaar. The emotional journey between Dulal and Ruma captures the hope and ambivalence that characterise romances between singletons in the big city. Unlike most indie films, which tend to stick their female characters with cigarettes and aggression, Sulemani Keeda treats Ruma like an angel who pulls Dulal back from the brink and orients him. “You can find out a lot about a filmmaker’s politics by seeing how he treats children and women in his films,” Masurkar observed.

Masurkar's own position on the movie business is flexible enough to be satirical without being cynical. “I made this film in this way because I didn’t want to be at the mercy of others,” he said. “The whole idea was to have control and not be answerable to anybody. I made a list of things I had access too – friends, shooting locations and actors for major speaking parts – and once I had these in place, the writing became easier. I have other scripts, and they will cost much more, but for this film, at least, I didn’t want to be at the mercy of others.”

It sounds exactly like something Dulal-Mainak would say.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.