Film preview

'Sulemani Keeda' is a charming slacker comedy about struggling writers with Bollywood dreams

Amit Masurkar’s wry comedy opens on December 5.

There are films about life, love, crime and death, there are films about films, and then there are films about the trauma of making films.

In Mumbai, where more projects are shelved than completed, the agony of not being able to get a project off the ground is especially acute – and inspirational. Indie films such as Missed Call (2005) and The Untitled Karthik Krishnan Project (2010) have exposed some of Bollywood’s worst-kept secrets: aspiring filmmakers need a godfather or two to get ahead, nepotism rules, formula trumps originality, writers are treated like dirt, promises are made to be broken, and the nerds rarely get the girls.

Amit Masurkar’s Sulemani Keeda explores one writing pair's anguish at not being able to get a screenplay produced. Dulal and Mainak have yet not reached the legendary status of the renowned collaborators Salim and Javed,though they would like to. The roommates hawk their screenplay to several producers (including Mahesh Bhatt and Anil Sharma, sportingly playing themselves), only to be told that they don’t have what it takes to make a Hindi movie.

The young men also meet and try to impress women at various house parties. Dulal (Naveen Kasturia) seems to get lucky when he meets Ruma (Aditi Vasudev), a gentle and generous soul who sees past his awkwardness and befriends him.

Mainak (Mayank Tewari), meanwhile, is a blithe spirit who tries his luck everywhere.

Spoofing Bollywood

Billed as a slacker comedy, Masurkar’s wry, engaging and nicely observed debut was shown at the Mumbai Film Festival last year, and is being released through PVR Cinemas’ Director’s Rare label on December 5. Made for Rs 25-odd lakh, Sulemani Keeda is a far more convincing and honest insider spoof of Bollywood than the recently released Happy Ending.

Masurkar’s own cinematic adventure hasn’t ended too badly either, but the journey to the cinemas hasn’t been easy. The reactions he got when he showed the movie to various leading studios was similar to the feedback Dulal and Mainak get when they try to hardsell their dream project.

“There was a pattern to the response – creative teams and the bosses of studios would love the film, while the marketing teams would veto it by saying it could not be marketed since it didn’t have any stars,” Masurkar said. (It is, of course, entirely possible that the studios were playing one of the oldest games in the book – the good cop bad cop routine.)

Some of the reactions came at the level of the episode-driven script itself. "When I wrote the script and showed it to people, the first thing they said was, where is the story, it is only a series of events,” Masurkar said. “People in Bollywood are trained to think about films as being pre- or post-interval.”

Sulemani Keeda (it roughly translates into A Pain in the Posterior) might be set in the glamour-struck of Hindi film entertainment, but it could be “a very universal people about two people struggling in a big city in any industry”, Masurkar added. He picked the movies as a backdrop because of his own experience as a writer for television shows over the past decade, including sketches for the spoof series The Great Indian Comedy Show.

The characters are partly imaginary and partly fictionalised versions of people that he has met over the years. For instance, the outlandish Indian Alain Delon wannabe Gonzo, who is the only one who takes the writer duo seriously, is lurking somewhere in Mumbai.

Sulemani Keeda is refreshingly relaxed about the angst levels felt by its characters. They do worry about their professional prospects, and they are somewhat behind on their rent. Dulal, in particular, is a brooder, given to lugubrious statements about the future of the human race that never fails to cause Ruma to break into a grin. Tamil cinematographer and director Rajiv Menon had elegantly poked fun at directorial angst in his Kandukondain Kandukondain (2000), in which Ajit’s character gives up trying to make an original film and instead pitches a remake of Speed with a major twist – the lead character is a woman rather than a man.

Sulemani Keeda displays a similar light touch in dealing with its characters’ misadventures. “I don’t like it when people romanticise their struggles,” Masurkar said. “Most people who claim to have struggled so much haven’t actually. If so many people slept on railway platforms while trying to find work, then you would find the best writers there.”

The whole idea in Sulemani Keeda was to put the word "struggle" on a pedestal, the 33 year-old filmmaker added. “The film is not as much about making the film as about what these guys actually want to do in life,” he said. “It’s not as though these guys want to make an art film either – the story is balanced about their own tastes and interests. I was also interested in the dynamic between collaborators. The characters are sharing an apartment, a dream, and tee shirts – is it possible that two people can have the exact same goal? And what if one of them grows out of it?”

The easy banter between the characters, especially Dulal and Mainak, flowed out of the fact that Masurkar wrote the script for Kasturia and Tewari, keeping in mind their speech patterns and behavioural tics. “Naveen and Mayank were pre-cast, in a sense.” he said. “At first I was trying to cast someone else other than Mayank, but then I figured out, why should I cast anybody else to play Mayank when I have him?”

Kasturia, with whom Masurkar had rented an apartment at one point, alerted him about Aditi Vasudev, who gives a sparkling performance as Ruma. Vasudev had played the role of Rishi Kapoor’s daughter in Do Dooni Chaar. The emotional journey between Dulal and Ruma captures the hope and ambivalence that characterise romances between singletons in the big city. Unlike most indie films, which tend to stick their female characters with cigarettes and aggression, Sulemani Keeda treats Ruma like an angel who pulls Dulal back from the brink and orients him. “You can find out a lot about a filmmaker’s politics by seeing how he treats children and women in his films,” Masurkar observed.

Masurkar's own position on the movie business is flexible enough to be satirical without being cynical. “I made this film in this way because I didn’t want to be at the mercy of others,” he said. “The whole idea was to have control and not be answerable to anybody. I made a list of things I had access too – friends, shooting locations and actors for major speaking parts – and once I had these in place, the writing became easier. I have other scripts, and they will cost much more, but for this film, at least, I didn’t want to be at the mercy of others.”

It sounds exactly like something Dulal-Mainak would say.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.