maternal health

Why Tamil Nadu is the best state in India for new mothers

For decades, successive governments in this state have focused on improving healthcare access for pregnant women.

Kayalvizhi Sundar, 25, beams as she comes out of the Government Women and Children’s Hospital in Egmore in Chennai on a hot humid morning earlier this month.

She has just received a sum of Rs 4,000 from the Tamil Nadu state government. “The nurse told me that this money was for me to eat healthy food,” said Sundar, who is seven months pregnant. “She advised me and my husband that I should not spend it on anything else.”

Sundar will receive another Rs 8,000 from the state in two instalments – once when she delivers her baby and another when the child is four-and-a-half months old. But before collecting her last instalment, however, she will have to get her baby immunised with the pentavalent vaccine, which combines different vaccines in one injection and protects infants against whooping cough, tetanus, hepatitis B, diphtheria, and a bacteria that causes meningitis and pneumonia.

Tamil Nadu, with a clutch of such well-planned and well-implemented healthcare and monetary programmes, is arguably one of the best states in India for expecting moms. And this month, the government rolled out another landmark initiative for mothers.

On August 3 – to commemorate International Breastfeeding Week – state Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa inaugurated more than 350 breastfeeding rooms at bus terminals across the state, where mothers can feed their children. This is the first time any state in the country has made such arrangements. On the same day, breast milk banks were launched in seven government hospitals across the state. Each hospital would be given equipment worth up to Rs 10 lakh to store milk donated by mothers. According to reports, milk in these banks can be preserved for up to three months.

Nurturing state

For decades, successive governments in this southern Indian state have focused on improving healthcare access for pregnant women.

In 1987, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government, under former Chief Minister MG Ramachandran, launched the state’s flagship programme for pregnant women – the Dr Muthulakshmi Reddy Maternity Benefit Scheme, named after the prominent women’s rights activist.

The first-of-its-kind scheme in the country initially provided an amount of Rs 300 to every woman below the poverty line to help cover the expenses incurred during childbirth. In 1995, the sum was increased to Rs 500. A little over a decade later, the amount was raised more than tenfold to Rs 6,000. Then, in 2011, the current state government doubled this sum to Rs 12,000.

“In 2012, the National Food Security Act was passed by the government of India and this Act has a clause in it that provides maternity benefit of Rs 6,000 for every pregnant mother in the country,” said Job Zachariah, who heads the field office of United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund, in Chennai. “Not a single state has implemented this important benefit till date. Tamil Nadu is the only state doing this.”

Experts Quartz spoke to say that the AIADMK government under Jayalalithaa – who has spent 13 of the last 24 years as the state’s chief minister, stepping down twice over corruption charges – is more proactive than others in implementing initiatives for the benefit of pregnant women and new mothers. Consider, for instance, the Amma baby care kit launched in 2014 for a sum of Rs 67 crore. The scheme provides new mothers in government hospitals with baby powder, towel, dress, mosquito net, oil, shampoo, soap and even a toy for the baby.

In 1992, during her first stint as chief minister, Jayalalithaa’s pioneering programmes for unwed pregnant mothers – the cradle baby scheme – was aimed at reducing infanticide, specifically female infanticide. Women could leave unwanted infants, mostly infants born out of wedlock, in cradles set up in government shelters rather than killing them. Over 4,000 children have been left to the care of the state government under this scheme from 1992 to 2012, as per official records.

In the last decade alone, the state has managed to bring down infant mortality rate from 24 per 1,000 births in 2005 to 21 in 2013. This figure is almost half of the national average of 40 infants dying out of every 1,000 births. The maternal mortality rate of 90 deaths per 100,000 live deliveries is also well below the national average of 178.

Tamil Nadu ranks high in terms of institutional deliveries, too. Almost 99.3% of pregnant women deliver at hospitals, rather than at home. Compare this with 87.9% of institutional deliveries in Gujarat, 76.3% in West Bengal and 90.3% in Maharashtra, according to data from the latest report on the Rapid Survey on Children conducted by the union ministry of women and child development.

Borne by state

“As far as Tamil Nadu is concerned, everything is free for a pregnant woman until the child is six months old,” said S Srinivasan, state coordinator for the National Rural Health Mission in Chennai.

Once a woman registers her pregnancy with the state, she has access to free health check-ups, including five ultrasound scans. If required, the government also covers the cost of caesarean births and anaesthetists.

“If specific medicines are not available at the hospital, the government allows hospitals to buy them from outside and reimburses the cost. We practically have unlimited funds as far as pregnant mothers are concerned,” Srinivasan said.

Ambulance services for pregnant women – both pick-up and drop facilities post delivery – are also free.

Malnutrition

The state government may be proactive in delivering healthcare to pregnant mothers but the system isn’t entirely flawless. Doctors admit that corruption is a problem – and mothers in remote areas of the state often do not get the full sum of Rs 12,000, as government workers take their cut. Experts also say that giving money to pregnant women won’t do much unless the larger issue of malnutrition is sufficiently addressed.

“Giving money for nutritious food only once a woman is six-seven months pregnant makes no sense,” said Poongothai Aladi Aruna, a gynaecologist and former minister in the rival Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam government. “Tamil Nadu’s women suffer from chronic malnutrition and anaemia. Many women are in such poor health that they do not have breast milk to feed the child. We need to address the larger issue of malnutrition first and we need to do it urgently.”

Only 18.8% women in Tamil Nadu breastfeed, according to UNICEF. Singari Velmurugan, a 26-year-old resident of a remote village called Kuzhipatti, isn’t one of them.

From her village, the closest primary health centre is about 5 km away, and the closest district hospital is at a distance of 35 km in Dharmapuri town. She says a nurse visits her tiny hamlet twice a month to attend to pregnant women in the area. “The nurse gives us smelly tablets and does tests when we get pregnant,” she said. “We go once a week to the anganwadi and take the maavu (Tamil for flour), which we make kanji (Tamil for gruel or porridge) with, and have it. Sometimes they give us an egg, too.”

But despite this diet, Velmurugan could not feed her son.

“When my son was born, I did not have any breast milk,” she said. “I took the powders properly as instructed but food is scarce here. My husband earns only Rs 1,000 a month and it is barely enough to feed him, myself, my mother-in-law and my father-in-law,” she said.

The problem of malnutrition became central to healthcare debate last November after the death of 13 newborns at a government hospital in Dharmapuri. Most of the infants who died had malformed lungs, according to hospital reports, indicating that mothers suffered acute malnutrition.

Nonetheless, Tamil Nadu is far ahead of several other Indian states when it comes to taking care of mothers-to-be.

This article was originally published on qz.com.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.