Animal Welfare

#NoMore50: Activists are rising to demand harsher punishments for cruelty to animals

Fines for hurting animals in India are as low as Rs 50. But activists are now approaching the Supreme Court, Parliament and social media to create change.

In India, being cruel to animals is a crime, but not one that the law seems to take too seriously. A person could kick a cat, mutilate stray dogs, whip a horse or even starve their own pet, but if found guilty, they’d get off with paying a fine as little as Rs 10 or as much as Rs 50. These penalties of Rs 10-50 were determined when the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act was formed in 1960, and the figures have not changed in the 56 years since then.

Now, a group of animal welfare organisations and activists are on their way to ensure that the law is amended so that harsher punishments are imposed on those who harm animals.

On May 12, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a public interest litigation by Angel Trust, a non-profit organisation working for animal welfare, that seeks more stringent penalties for crimes against animals. Meanwhile, the India chapter of Humane Society International has also enlisted Member of Parliament Poonam Mahajan to introduce a private member’s bill in the Lok Sabha to suitably amend the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The bill is scheduled to be proposed in the next parliamentary session.

In the third aspect of this campaign, Humane Society and People for Animals launched an online campaign called #NoMore50 on May 13, urging animal lovers across India to demand penalties harsher than Rs 50 for being cruel to animals.

“We are hoping that a multi-pronged approach that involves the legislature, the judiciary and social media will give momentum to this movement for stricter laws,” said Nuggehalli Jayasimha, the managing director of Humane Society International/India.

Ineffectual penalties

Under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, a person who performs any act of cruelty towards animals, pets or strays, can be fined a minimum of Rs 10 and a maximum of Rs 50 for a first-time offence. For a repeat offence, the penalty is a fine of Rs 25 or Rs 100 and/or imprisonment for a maximum of three months. Based on this, sections 428 and 429 of the Indian Penal Code provide for punishment in the form of jail-time for those who maim, kill or poison animals: for animals “of the value of ten rupees or upwards”, prison term may extend to two years, while for animals “of the value of fifty rupees or upwards” – including horses, cattle, elephants and camels – prison term may extend to five years.

Those working in the field of animal welfare claim that such punishments are completely pointless and ineffectual because prison sentences are rarely meted out and the fines imposed are paltry.

At Mumbai’s Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, for instance, a team of “animal inspectors” regularly attend court hearings dealing with animal cruelty cases, and watch perpetrators walk away with almost no consequences and barely a dent in their wallets.

“In Mumbai we see at least 250-300 cases of animal cruelty in a month, but in my 14 years in this field, I have seen the courts award imprisonment just once,” said SB Kadam, assistant secretary of the SPCA. “It was a case of a man mistreating a bullock, and his prison sentence was for just three days.”

According to Jayasimha, when people accused of committing cruelty to animals are brought to court, they plead guilty 90% of the time. “Then they just pay Rs 50 and leave, because that amount means nothing to them,” he said.

‘People think they can get away with it’

In 2014, in its judgement banning the bull-fighting tradition of jallikattu in Tamil Nadu, the Supreme Court had mentioned that penal provisions for cruelty to animals needed to be increased. In response, the union government’s Animal Welfare Board of India submitted in Parliament a fresh Animal Welfare Bill, intended to replace the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. “[Environment minister] Prakash Javadekar heard us but did not accept the bill we proposed,” said Jayasimha, who is also a member of the Animal Welfare Board of India.

Last month, when the Uttarakhand Police’s horse Shaktiman died of injuries inflicted by BJP legislator Ganesh Joshi, Jayasimha and other animal rights activists decided to push for at least an amendment to the existing Act to ensure that harsher punishments are imposed for cruelty.

“We are merely asking for a correction of the Rs 10-50 fine based on the current value of the Rupee after adjusting for inflation,” said Jayasimha. “We approached Poonam Mahajan to bring in a private member’s bill because she truly cares about animals. And the Angel Trust approached lawyer Prashant Bhushan to file a PIL in the Supreme Court.”

Jayasimha believes the fine for cruelty to animals could be anything from Rs 2,000 to Rs 10,000, but it ought to be something more realistic. In Mumbai, SB Kadam claims a fine between Rs 1,000 and Rs 3,000 might suffice.

Meanwhile, Geeta Seshamani, co-founder of Delhi-based animal welfare organisation Friendicoes, believes that fines should be high enough to hurt – and for those who have the capacity to pay, they could be as high as Rs 30,000.

“The forms of cruelty that we see towards animals are alarming, and reflect the kind of latent violence we harbour in society,” said Seshamani, who has seen numerous cases involving people throwing acid on stray dogs or owners leaving their pets tied up in balconies, without food, for days at a stretch. “People are not afraid to be cruel because they think they can get away with it. This is why we need stronger punishments.”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

The ordeal of choosing the right data pack for your connectivity needs

"Your data has been activated." <10 seconds later> "You have crossed your data limit."

The internet is an amazing space where you can watch a donkey playing football while simultaneously looking up whether the mole on your elbow is a symptom of a terminal diseases. It’s as busy as it’s big with at least 2.96 billion pages in the indexed web and over 40,000 Google search queries processed every second. If you have access to this vast expanse of information through your mobile, then you’re probably on something known as a data plan.

However, data plans or data packs are a lot like prescription pills. You need to go through a barrage of perplexing words to understand what they really do. Not to mention the call from the telecom company rattling on at 400 words per minute about a life-changing data pack which is as undecipherable as reading a doctor’s handwriting on the prescription. On top of it all, most data packs expect you to solve complex algorithms on permutations to figure out which one is the right one.


Even the most sophisticated and evolved beings of the digital era would agree that choosing a data pack is a lot like getting stuck on a seesaw, struggling to find the right balance between getting the most out of your data and not paying for more than you need. Running out of data is frustrating, but losing the data that you paid for but couldn’t use during a busy month is outright infuriating. Shouldn’t your unused data be rolled over to the next month?

You peruse the advice available online on how to go about choosing the right data pack, most of which talks about understanding your own data usage. Armed with wisdom, you escape to your mind palace, Sherlock style, and review your access to Wifi zones, the size of the websites you regularly visit, the number of emails you send and receive, even the number of cat videos you watch. You somehow manage to figure out your daily usage which you multiply by 30 and there it is. All you need to do now is find the appropriate data pack.

Promptly ignoring the above calculations, you fall for unlimited data plans with an “all you can eat” buffet style data offering. You immediately text a code to the telecom company to activate this portal to unlimited video calls, selfies, instastories, snapchats – sky is the limit. You tell all your friends and colleagues about the genius new plan you have and how you’ve been watching funny sloth videos on YouTube all day, well, because you CAN!


Alas, after a day of reign, you realise that your phone has run out of data. Anyone who has suffered the terms and conditions of unlimited data packs knows the importance of reading the fine print before committing yourself to one. Some plans place limits on video quality to 480p on mobile phones, some limit the speed after reaching a mark mentioned in the fine print. Is it too much to ask for a plan that lets us binge on our favourite shows on Amazon Prime, unconditionally?

You find yourself stuck in an endless loop of estimating your data usage, figuring out how you crossed your data limit and arguing with customer care about your sky-high phone bill. Exasperated, you somehow muster up the strength to do it all over again and decide to browse for more data packs. Regrettably, the website wont load on your mobile because of expired data.


Getting the right data plan shouldn’t be this complicated a decision. Instead of getting confused by the numerous offers, focus on your usage and guide yourself out of the maze by having a clear idea of what you want. And if all you want is to enjoy unlimited calls with friends and uninterrupted Snapchat, then you know exactly what to look for in a plan.


The Airtel Postpaid at Rs. 499 comes closest to a plan that is up front with its offerings, making it easy to choose exactly what you need. One of the best-selling Airtel Postpaid plans, the Rs. 499 pack offers 40 GB 3G/4G data that you can carry forward to the next bill cycle if unused. The pack also offers a one year subscription to Amazon Prime on the Airtel TV app.

So, next time, don’t let your frustration get the better of you. Click here to find a plan that’s right for you.


This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Airtel and not by the Scroll editorial team.