Prison diaries

Growing up in Indian prisons: Children of undertrials and a case of widespread neglect

While a debate is raging on trying juveniles as adults in serious crimes, there are hundreds of children who spend years in prison for no fault of their own.

As the lone tap fills the cracked cement tank, green algae float to the surface of the water. Munna (name changed to protect identity) splashes around in the tank, while women gather to fill small jugs with water that will later be used for both washing and drinking. Munna is three years old, and his life revolves around the sludgy water games and women in the enclosure of the Belgaum Central Prison in Karnataka.

Munna was born in this prison, and has lived here all his life. His mother is facing trial for alleged murder. Media debates have raged around harsher punishments for teenagers who commit serious crimes, but little attention is paid to this other category of children in prisons.

The three-year-old barely speaks. He recognises his mother as ammi and other women inmates as khala. The only men in his life are the police constables who occasionally visit the female barracks. He is a stranger to almost everything about the world outside. “It was only recently that he saw a dog for the first time during my court visit,” his mother recalled. "He was startled."

Who's following the guidelines?

As many as 1,817 children live with their undertrial or convicted mothers in prisons across India, state National Crime Records Bureau's 2014 Prison Statistics.

In 2006, the Supreme Court issued guidelines in the RD Upadhyay vs State of AP case to ensure that certain basic standards are observed with regard to children of women prisoners. These guidelines are aligned with international standards such as the United Nation's Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners (UN Bangkok Rules) and the UN Minimum Standards for Treatment of Prisoners (the Mandela Rules). But the implementation of this ruling leaves much to be desired.

During the 2006 hearing, the Supreme Court, even as it is observed that a prison is no place to raise a child, recognised that children may have to stay in jail for no fault of their own. Given their reasoning that children should not be separated from their mothers in their formative years, especially when there are no close family members willing or available to take care of them, the court said that children should be allowed to stay with women prisoners till the age of six, but not after that.

The court directed state governments to protect the fundamental rights of children in prison, work towards their welfare and provide for their social, educational and cultural development. Children are entitled to food, shelter, medical care, clothing, education and recreational facilities as a matter of right, it said.

Confined spaces, confined childhoods

On the ground, however, these guidelines seem to mean little. As part of its ongoing research on undertrial prisoners, researchers from Amnesty International India, including this writer, visited a number of jails in Karnataka. Across the board, it found that prison systems are structured and run with male inmates at the centre and most arrangements, however deficient, are made to suit them, while women inmates’ needs are overlooked.

In Karnataka prisons, women are frequently confined to small enclosures inside the main prison and access to other facilities is restricted. Libraries, open spaces and even the prison’s administrative buildings are beyond their access.

In Bidar, we saw two children confined in a damp dirty enclosure inside the district prison with 11 women. Leave aside recreational facilities, the enclosure was built in such a way that it received almost no sunlight.

Additionally, though the SC guidelines state that as far as possible, pregnant women prisoners should be temporary released, or given parole or a suspended sentence so that they can avoid delivering a child in jail, Amnesty came across examples where this was not done.

Last year, Shailaja (name changed) delivered her son in Belgaum Central Jail. She told the researchers that she did not know she was entitled to temporary release, and jail authorities had not taken any steps to allow her to give birth outside prison. She and her child have been in prison since and no action has been taken against any jail official.

Small steps in a lengthy struggle

Karnataka’s Director General of Police (Prisons), Satyanarayana Rao, admitted that little had been done to provide a clean and healthy environment for women prisoners with children. "There has been no change in the prison manual since 1978,” he said. “But now, we are in the process of re-examining the manual and hopefully, by end of this month, a revised one will be ready and sent to the state government for approval.”

As per the Supreme Court guidelines, once a child turns six, he or she is supposed to be handed over to a suitable surrogate, or transferred into protective custody in a home and brought to prison to meet the mother at least once a week. But the lack of co-ordination between protective homes and the chronically understaffed prisons department makes this difficult. Officials in six prisons that Amnesty visited over the past few months admitted that children are seldom brought to meet their mothers in prison.

Rao, who has been conducting surprise visits to prisons across the state, recently ordered an overhaul of the visitor’s rooms, including the doing away of the wired mesh separating prisoners from visitors. “It is practically impossible for prisoners to talk through the mesh,” he said. “The set-up is so chaotic that mothers never get to speak to their children. So, an arrangement is being made to enable direct contact. We are modifying the present system into a more human-friendly one.”

Amnesty also came across instances where the education and recreational arrangements prescribed in the guidelines were not met. Often, literate prisoners double up as teachers for children and women inmates.

In Gulbarga prison, a convict is in charge of conducting classes for children. Jail officials said she is also responsible, however, for maintaining “peace and harmony” in the barrack, documenting prisoners’ cases, and drafting court applications. With all these duties, she said, teaching takes a back seat. “It is only that much can I do with my time,” said the 42-year-old, who is scheduled to be released in a few months. “Once I am gone, there is no one who can fill my space.”

The Supreme Court guidelines had also said that courts should prioritise cases of women prisoners with children. But as happens with other undertrials, the lack of police escorts, poverty and inadequate legal representation means that these cases drag on.

Women prisoners with children have very little say in how they are treated. And growing up in sub-standard prison conditions has is far from conducive to a healthy childhood. Clearly, there’s a pressing need for the state government and the judiciary – and even civil society – to do much more.

The writer is a researcher with Amnesty International India.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.