Crime Against Women

Four years after 2012 Delhi gangrape, most promises for women's safety have come to naught

Police's women help desks are generally manned by new recruits who rarely having any legal training.

Four years after the December 16, 2012, gang-rape of a physiotherapy student, the administrative overhaul promised is fading, according to our investigation of the reform process that was to make women in India’s capital safer. Here's a quick glance at the state of reforms since then:

  • Rapes reported have tripled.
  • Instead of 33%, women are 8.4% of Delhi Police ranks.
  • The biases of male officers are as evident as before, as occasional training is left to nonprofits.
  • Expenditure on training has dropped from 9.4% in 2013 to 2.57% in 2015.
  • Although Rs 322 crore was set aside for a Nirbhaya Fund to create a mobile-phone-borne alarm system for women, three years bids for the contract were issued, the bidding has not closed.

Holes in reform measures

One of the important changes to the law recommended by the Verma Commission tasked with reforms post the brutal gangrape was that female officers should record crimes against women and handle their statements.

For this, the government had to allow the hiring of more women, so that they fill 33% of what are called “non-gazetted” ranks, from constable to sub-inspector. That approval came in March 2015.

There has been some progress: the female constabulary of the Delhi police grew from 3,572 in 2011 to 4,582 in 2015, according to the Data on Police organisations reports 2011-2015 of the Bureau of Police Research and Development.

However, women comprise less than 9% of the Delhi Police force and 6.4% of the police force nationwide, according to 2015 Bureau of Police Research and Development data. This 2014 study by the bureau on police working conditions nationwide suggested that nearly 20% of female representation would lead to better policing.

Training on gender-sensitivity has been slow, although police officers said there has been progress.

The first nationwide advisory on such training – which includes making police aware of discrimination and violence against women, family structures, case law, legal provisions, scientific aids and methods to handle victims – was issued in 2009, according to this 2014 reply to the Rajya Sabha, Parliament’s upper house.

Such training was part of the curriculum of India’s police force at all levels, according to this 1993 report by the National Commission of Women. Kishan Kumar, special commissioner of police (training), Delhi Police, emphasised that “gender sensitisation is an integral component of police training”.

But there are no special funds set aside, “no separate head for budget allocation and utilisation for gender sensitisation”, as Varsha Sharma, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Special Unit for Women and Children, Delhi Police put it.

Gender-sensitisation programmes aim to bring in help-desks staffed by women, training in schools, neighbourhoods and ensuring the police immediately resistor crimes against women, said Sharma.

“The programmes are conducted not only by police training colleges but by non government organisations (NGOs) and civil society organisations as well,” she said. There are 161 helpdesks for women across Delhi, and this response to a right-to-information (RTI) request by the writer revealed that between 2012 and 2015, the Delhi Police ran 65 courses on gender sensitisation.

In terms of crimes against women, none of this has helped.

Rapes have tripled

As the chart below indicates, rapes reported in Delhi have increased 200% since 2012, after the gangrape in Delhi had prompted mass protests, political promises and efforts at reform.

A comparison of Delhi police reports from 2014 and 2015 revealed a rise in the rape cases withdrawn, from 81 to 104, possibly indicating a lack of faith in the criminal-justice system, especially as cases fail judicial scrutiny.

“There is a definite need to have a steadfast and robust investigation, rather than obsessing over solving cases within a week or a fortnight,” said Rebecca Mammen John, a Supreme Court lawyer. “There is an increase in instantaneous registration, but we need to ask how far the investigation process remains as shoddy as it was before 2012. The language used by the police officers is as perverse as before. There is a dire need to follow basic protocols for investigation.”

An “important weakness” in the investigative process is the lack of forensic evidence, said John. For instance, raped women tend to urinate or wash themselves after the incident, making medical proof difficult. But an investigative process that is sensitive and robust would pay heed to evidence from fingernails (where a rapist’s skin might be stuck), DNA tests markings and torn clothes.

“Many of the victims are forced to sit for hours in bloodied clothes, even after an examination, without being allowed to change/shower,” said this 2013 Reuters analysis, quoting the Human Rights Watch report, 2010. “In most cases, no trauma counselling is given.”

Other crimes against women rose 50% over the same period, from 208 to 1498, according to Delhi Police data.

Growing violence in a city of 18 million people and 866 women for every 1,000 males may be inevitable, but it is clear the police need to do more to protect women.

Quality of help

While the Delhi Police now have 161 help desks staffed by female officers, they are evidently overworked, with 70% female officers reporting for over 8-hour shifts per day, according to this 2014 Bureau of Police Research and Development study on national police working conditions.

Those who deal with these help desks question their competence.

“Women help desks are generally manned by new recruits, rarely having training on legal and social aspects,” Shikha Chibber, a New Delhi-based human rights lawyer told IndiaSpend.

The view is disputed by DCP Sharma. “Women help desks are manned by lady constables who are given training as police officers and frequent training rounds," she said. "These include trainings of literacy, legal awareness, soft skill development and gender sensitivity. Trainings sessions are conducted by the police training colleges and Special Police Unit for Women and Children."

She added: "We have conducted two rounds of trainings with women help desks since January 2016 and one more round is scheduled in September. Women help desks are like an interface for the registration of complaint, they don’t function as investigative agencies. Since they have been started recently, they will gain experience with time”.

The training lacunae might only grow as training expenditure falls. Between 2011 and 2015, Delhi Police expenditure remained largely the same, but the money spent on training declined from 6.42% in 2011 – peaking in 2013 at 9.35% – to 2.57% in 2015.

“In spite of the shocking and frightening picture, the police response to violence against women remains grossly inadequate and inappropriate,” according to this 1993 National Commission for Women report. “Police officers hold several stereotypes – like rape is victim-precipitated, male sexuality is an uncontrollable force and women should not arouse it.”

Chibber, the lawyer, said NGOs provide the gender-sensitivity training in police training schools and there is no standard plan or curriculum, and officers do not take it seriously.

“For many of them, it is a relaxation or a leisure-time activity,” said Chibber. “The biggest failure is that there is no impact assessment exercise, no follow-up mechanism and no agency to monitor the trainings.”

There is an imbalance in such training, said Pratishtha Arora, a trainer at the Centre for Social Research, an advocacy. “Lower ranked women are not as empowered as their male counterparts to voice themselves,” said Arora. “Thus, training itself depicts a deep patriarchal bias.”

Arora said male officers often complain, during training sessions, that female colleagues do not work as hard. “A peculiar patriarchal statement we often get to hear is, ‘why pay them equally when they are not even hard working’.”

Funds stuck

After the Nirbhaya outrage, geo-positioning satellite technology was supposed to be used to set up a computer response system that would locate women in distress, according to this reply in the Lok Sabha in August 2014.

The Nirbhaya Fund, started in 2013, was to fund other measures, according to this report to the Lok Sabha (Parliament’s lower house), including helplines, hiring professional counsellors for police stations (Rs 6.2 crore) and a building (Rs 23.5 crore) to house a special unit to address crimes against women and children.

About Rs 322 crore was set aside for the nationwide emergency response project in 114 cities and crime-prone districts, but three years after approval, bidding for the project continues, according to this 2015-16 report – the latest available – from the Union ministry of home affairs. While Delhi already has a helpline, the new system was supposed to be an universal emergency response for women in distress.

While the special unit has its building, there are four helplines available for women in distress: The police control room (100), an anti-stalking helpline (1091), another to report obscenity (1096) and yet another (181) to help women in distress.

Complaints to these helplines declined 21% from 74,944 in 2014 to 58,956 in 2015, according to this answer to the Rajya Sabha in 2015.

“We can use as many as innovative terms but the actual reform will take place when there is rehabilitation of the victim, counselling and emotional support for the victim’s family,” said John. “The state has largely failed in the follow up mechanism. Allocation of huge funds with bleak implementation is like paying lip-service to the law, to a moment that created history.”

A senior police officer, requesting anonymity, agreed. “While the contours of the policy seem exemplary, at the implementation level, it has slowed down badly….in other words, failed.”

This article first appeared on IndiaSpend, a data-driven and public-interest journalism non-profit.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.