Press Freedom

Journalists resort to self-censorship after Maldives passes draconian defamation law

The law effectively made criticism of the government a criminal offence.

In the second week of August, a 59-year-old resident of Vaavu, an atoll nearly 40 miles to the south of Malé, the capital of the Maldives, went missing. After preliminary inquiries, the police registered a case and the information was circulated on a Viber group for the local media.

That afternoon, at an editorial meeting at the office of private news broadcaster VTV, journalists found themselves in a fix. In ordinary circumstances, the tip-off would have been followed up by the usual routine of newsgathering: shots of the island the missing person lived on, an interview with a family member and a quote from an investigator. These details would then be aired along with those of the missing person: his name, age and circumstances of disappearance.

But the Defamation and Freedom of Speech Act, passed in the Maldivian Parliament on August 11, made this familiar drill rather tricky.

“Under the new law, we couldn’t report his name without his permission,” said a VTV editor on condition of anonymity.

Draconian law

The Act states that every citizen is allowed to protect her or his identity and that before the publication of any reportage there needs to be evidence that “adequate efforts” were made to contact the person named in the report. The law sets heavy fines, jail terms and even the closure of media outlets for violations of its provisions.

Such draconian provisions give ample scope for misuse by politicians, criminal offenders and even common citizens.

In India, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa is infamous for pressing defamation charges to suppress criticism and has filed over 200 cases against the media and political rivals over the past five years. On August 24, the Supreme Court pulled her up for “misusing state machinery”.

Within hours of the enactment of the defamation law, the Indian Ocean archipelago’s Opposition parties, the United Nations, the US State Department, the UK, and Amnesty International called it an attack on the freedom of speech and expression. Mona Rishwami, chief of the Rule of Law branch at the UN Human Rights office in Geneva, observed that the Act used religion, national security and social norms to cripple these freedoms.

At VTV, the editorial team grappled with a more fundamental question: how do you contact someone who is untraceable? If the person’s disappearance turned out to be voluntary and not the result of a criminal act, he was within his rights to sue for defamation. This could lead to a penalty equivalent to Rs 87.4 lakh, imprisonment of up to six months, or closure of the media outlet.

“The news we carried that afternoon was short,” said the editor, mildly amused. “A person is missing, the police are searching.”

Stifling dissent

The defamation bill was proposed in March 2016, a month after an audit report revealed that senior government officials stole nearly Rs 540 crore from government coffers. While there were allegations of the involvement of the highest office, President Abdulla Yameen dismissed the claims, and blamed his deputy Ahmed Adeeb instead. The former vice president had been arrested in October 2015 on suspicion of plotting to assassinate Yameen and was subsequently tried and jailed for terrorism and corruption. He is now serving a 33-year prison term.

The incarceration of Adeeb, however, has done little to change the perception of President Yameen’s involvement in the corruption case. The argument gained further currency when an invitation card announcing an upcoming screening of an Al Jazeera documentary about the scandal went viral on social media. The documentary, which refers to the President “hijacking a nation and stealing millions of dollars”, was criticised by the President’s loyalists, with one MP even threatening the channel with legal action.

Now that the Act has come into force, newsrooms across the Maldives have been forced to rethink their approach to journalism. Their main concern is the hefty fines allowed under the law, unaffordable to most. The VTV editor, a veteran with over a decade of experience, explained: “It is around 25 years of my annual pay, and 35 years if you speak of a cub journalist.” Interestingly, he added, the fine doesn’t go to the person pressing charges, but the state.

Opposition rallies censored

Since the last week of July, the main Opposition Maldivian Democratic Party has been holding rallies every night demanding the resignation of President Yameen. Raajje TV, a prominent news channel in the Maldives has been covering these rallies regularly, airing live feeds of the protests and speeches. The channel has now started self-censoring to avoid accusations of defamation. The rallies are aired with a delay of up to two minutes in case some parts needed to be bleeped out.

“The Opposition leaders are known to use words like vagu (thief) to describe the President,” said Abdulla Mohamed, prime-time news presenter. “We can’t air these words. In other programmes featuring Opposition leaders, we have told our journalists to control the guests.”

Documentaries that may show the country’s rulers in a bad light have also come to a halt. The channel has stopped production on a feature on the murder of Parliamentarian Dr Afrasheem. President Yameen has been accused of being involved in this case. Another documentary, featuring a black magician who claimed he helped the President win the 2013 election, has also been axed.

“It’s not that we are afraid,” said Mohamed. “We don’t want to give them room to shut us down.”

Maldives has fallen 61 places in the Reporters Without Borders’ press freedom index since 2008. In 2013, masked men broke into the Raajje TV office and set the TV station on fire. In 2014, Ahmed Rilwan, a journalist with the newspaper, Maldives Independent, was abducted after he wrote a series of reports critical of the government. None of the suspects in either case have been punished. Rilwan has still not been traced.

Sangu TV, a channel owned by a ruling party MP, also admitted that it was courting trouble each time it broadcast an Opposition-led protest. “We have limited resources and can’t afford the technology that allows for the broadcast feed to be delayed,” said Ahmed Mohamed, deputy news editor. “Under this bill, all it takes is a phone call by a defamed person to get us to stop the live feed.”

The bill was approved with the support of 47 MPs in an 85-member Parliament. In spite of the differences in opinion, the owner of Sangu TV voted in favour of the bill. He had little choice, explained Mohamed. The ruling Progressive Party of Maldives had issued a three-line whip to force the bill through.

Mohamed cited a satirical video featuring clips of police beating up protestors on the streets of Malé as an example of the videos the channel will now think twice about airing. The montage, set to the tunes of the popular song Who let the dogs out?, was very popular among the channel’s viewers. “We cannot air such videos anymore,” said Sangu TV’s Mohamed.

Other videos such as those with clips of President Yameen’s public appearances, set to the tunes of a Bollywood song of heartbreak, will be difficult to find on Maldivian TV screens too.

State channel unaffected

The only channel that is seemingly unruffled is the government-funded broadcaster, TVM.

“TVM is a government mouthpiece,” said a senior editor with the organisation. “Even if we might not think like them, we can’t speak out openly against it or there will be disciplinary measures.”

In the days leading up to the vote, the channel was told to defend the Act by saying that it was in line with tenets of Islam regarding the protection of one’s name.

“We had several panel discussions and featured pro-government lawyers and MPs,” said the editor. “The brief was that there needs to be some restraint on these fundamental freedoms…When you use religion to promote something, people will easily believe you.”

Hours after the new law was enforced, the government-funded channel broadcast a two-minute news package criticising former President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom over a tweet. The report raised questions about Gayoom’s sanity and accused him of aligning with exiled Opposition leader and former President Mohamed Nasheed. It was immediately termed derogatory.

The Opposition, however, refused to press charges. “This might have been a bait for the Opposition to use the law to its advantage,” said the editor. “This might give them room to accuse the Opposition of double standards.”

The airing of that particular package has given rise to speculation that the state-owned broadcaster would air more such “takedown pieces”.

The law doesn’t serve as a deterrent to TVM, explained the TVM editor. “We are funded by the taxpayer,” he said. “Even if penalised, the money will go straight to the government. It will be business as usual.”

A version of this article first appeared on Maldives Independent.

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Changing the conversation around mental health in rural India

Insights that emerged from discussions around mental health at a village this World Mental Health Day.

Questioning is the art of learning. For an illness as debilitating as depression, asking the right questions is an important step in social acceptance and understanding. How do I open-up about my depression to my parents? Can meditation be counted as a treatment for depression? Should heartbreak be considered as a trigger for deep depression? These were some of the questions addressed by a panel consisting of the trustees and the founder of The Live Love Lough Foundation (TLLLF), a platform that seeks to champion the cause of mental health. The panel discussion was a part of an event organised by TLLLF to commemorate World Mental Health Day.

According to a National Mental Health Survey of India 2015-16, conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), common mental disorders including depression, anxiety disorders and substance use disorders affect nearly 10% of the population, with 1 in 20 people in India suffering from depression. The survey reported a huge treatment gap, a problem that is spread far and wide across urban and rural parts of the country.

On 10th of October, trustees of the foundation, Anna Chandy, Dr. Shyam Bhat and Nina Nair, along with its founder, Deepika Padukone, made a visit to a community health project centre in Devangere, Karnataka. The project, started by The Association of People with Disability (APD) in 2010, got a much-needed boost after partnering with TLLLF 2 years ago, helping them reach 819 people suffering from mental illnesses and spreading its program to 6 Taluks, making a difference at a larger scale.


During the visit, the TLLLF team met patients and their families to gain insights into the program’s effectiveness and impact. Basavaraja, a beneficiary of the program, spoke about the issues he faced because of his illness. He shared how people used to call him mad and would threaten to beat him up. Other patients expressed their difficulty in getting access to medical aid for which they had to travel to the next biggest city, Shivmoga which is about 2 hours away from Davangere. A marked difference from when TLLLF joined the project two years ago was the level of openness and awareness present amongst the villagers. Individuals and families were more expressive about their issues and challenges leading to a more evolved and helpful conversation.

The process of de-stigmatizing mental illnesses in a community and providing treatment to those who are suffering requires a strong nexus of partners to make progress in a holistic manner. Initially, getting different stakeholders together was difficult because of the lack of awareness and resources in the field of mental healthcare. But the project found its footing once it established a network of support from NIMHANS doctors who treated the patients at health camps, Primary Healthcare Centre doctors and the ASHA workers. On their visit, the TLLLF team along with APD and the project partners discussed the impact that was made by the program. Were beneficiaries able to access the free psychiatric drugs? Did the program help in reducing the distance patients had to travel to get treatment? During these discussions, the TLLLF team observed that even amongst the partners, there was an increased sense of support and responsiveness towards mental health aid.

The next leg of the visit took the TLLLF team to the village of Bilichodu where they met a support group that included 15 patients and caregivers. Ujjala Padukone, Deepika Padukone’s mother, being a caregiver herself, was also present in the discussion to share her experiences with the group and encouraged others to share their stories and concerns about their family members. While the discussion revolved around the importance of opening up and seeking help, the team brought about a forward-looking attitude within the group by discussing future possibilities in employment and livelihood options available for the patients.

As the TLLLF team honoured World Mental Health day, 2017 by visiting families, engaging with support groups and reviewing the successes and the challenges in rural mental healthcare, they noticed how the conversation, that was once difficult to start, now had characteristics of support, openness and a positive outlook towards the future. To continue this momentum, the organisation charted out the next steps that will further enrich the dialogue surrounding mental health, in both urban and rural areas. The steps include increasing research on mental health, enhancing the role of social media to drive awareness and decrease stigma and expanding their current programs. To know more, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of The Live Love Laugh Foundation and not by the Scroll editorial team.