News Analyisis

The BJP wants to shift the focus to the RSS work in social service. Here's why it may not work

Its opponents see this as an opportunity to highlight the Sangh's attempt to further its Hindutva agenda in education and among tribals.

As the Opposition parties and civil society groups mount an ideological attack against the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, there is a growing view in the Bharatiya Janata Party that it should change the narrative of this debate – by shifting the focus to the Sangh’s activities in the social service sectors.

Ever since it came to power over two years ago, the BJP has been constantly pilloried for encouraging and supporting the divisive and communal agenda of its ideological mentor, the RSS.

Whether it was the issue of religious conversions, the controversy over growing intolerance, the saffronisation of educational and cultural institutions, the ban on the consumption of beef and the new-found belligerence of cow protection vigilantes, the BJP has been facing the wrath of its political opponents. They have accused the ruling party of being unnecessarily lenient to RSS members who have been indulging in violent activities.

This debate on the RSS is bound to sharpen in the coming months now that Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi, after much dithering, has finally decided to face trial in a defamation case regarding his remarks about the Sangh and convert his legal case into an ideological and political battle. This will ensure that the negative characteristics of the RSS remain a subject of animated discussion each time the Congress leader provides a historical account of how the RSS never participated in the country’s freedom movement and that a one-time member of the Sangh, Nathuram Godse, had assassinated Mahatma Gandhi.

Changing the debate

Since the RSS remains a favourite subject of debate on television news channels and in the print media, an influential section in the BJP has suggested that instead of getting entangled in an ideological discussion, the ruling party should use these debates to its advantage by shifting the focus to the "sewa" undertaken by the RSS members. “The BJP should draw attention to the network of schools run by the Sangh and also speak about its work in other areas like education and tribal rights, “ remarked a senior BJP leader.

The party, he said, held a brainstorming meeting recently to fine tune its response to the various charges hurled at the RSS. He said there was general agreement during these discussions that it would be a good idea to change the narrative and highlight the positive work being done by the RSS which has not been recognised. Since it is a low profile organisation and manned by self-effacing pracharaks, the BJP leaders maintained, nobody in the RSS spoke about its activities in the educational field or in the tribal areas. Nor has this work been documented, BJP leaders lamented.

"The mention of the RSS usually evokes images of khaki-clad men attending morning shakhas in neighbourhood parks or of militant looking men wearing saffron bands, carrying trishuls [or tridents] and marching through the streets shouting Jai Shri Ram," a BJP leader pointed out. “We can change this perception if we continuously highlight the selfless service being undertaken by the members of the world’s largest NGO."

The BJP leaders, who are pushing for this tactical shift, argue that their political opponents will find it difficult to counter their position if they constantly focus on the sewa done by the Sangh.

Another opportunity?

However, the BJP’s new strategy to highlight the social service work being done by the RSS is unlikely to deflect the opposition’s attention from its original script: that the Sangh’s basic ideology is to create a Hindu rashtra through its divisive agenda and that all its activities are actually aimed at propagating this communal philosophy.

In fact, the BJP’s political opponents will get an opportunity to underline that the Shishu Mandir (literally, temples for students) schools run by the educational wing of the RSS, are actually Hindutva laboratories to indoctrinate young minds. Similarly, they claim that the chief purpose of the RSS's Vanavasi Kalyan Ashrams (literally, tribal welfare centres) is to Hinduise adivasis and inculcate the Sangh’s ideology in the students.

As it happens, the Modi government is hard put to explain itself each time its party MPs and ministers make inflammatory speeches and RSS-affiliated organisations conduct activities like love jihad, ghar wapsi and resort to violence in the name of cow protection.

The BJP can hardly stray from the ideological moorings of the RSS.

At the same time, it cannot allow Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s development agenda, which promised to turn around the economy and create more jobs, to be derailed. Having spent his formative years in the RSS, Modi obviously finds it difficult to pull up the Sangh and it was only after considerable prodding that he recently commented on the manner in which gau rakshaks or cow protectors were indulging in violence.

Despite the prime minister’s brave words, it is difficult for the Modi government to distance itself from the RSS especially when the Prime Minister and his ministers line up before Sangh leaders to present an account of their work and to seek directions for the future.

With the RSS exercising overweening influence over the BJP, Modi has a tough job to convince people that his government disapproves of the activities of the RSS and various organisations affiliated to it.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.