India-Pakistan Ties

Sounding nothing like Gujarat CM, Narendra Modi asks Pakistan to declare war – on poverty

From a BJP stage in Kerala, Modi made his first public comments about Uri – and chose to address the people of Pakistan.

Almost a week after militant attacks on an Army base in Kashmir killed 18 Indian soldiers, Prime Minister Narendra Modi finally spoke in public about the incident – and chose to spend a large part of it directly addressing the people of Pakistan. Modi singled out India's nuclear neighbour for being the source of terror in Asia, but rather than announcing military retribution, called on the people of Pakistan to recognise how this policy was hurting themselves.

"I would like to speak to the people of Pakistan, to tell you that your leaders are misleading you by talking of Kashmir," Modi said, at a public rally that is part of the Bharatiya Janata Party's national conclave in Kozhikode, Kerala. "Both our countries got freedom in the same year. You should ask: why is India known the world over for exporting software, while Pakistan is known to export terror?"

After using the first part of his speech to talk of the BJP's achievements in Kerala and for the people of the state, Modi turned to bring up Uri. The speech was in fact much anticipated because, though other BJP members and the Ministry of External Affairs have said much about Pakistan since the attack, the prime minister himself simply put out a few tweets condemning the terror and saluting the soldiers who were killed.

After a few typical references to "one nation" in Asia that is known for exporting terror, the first surprise came when, instead of focusing just on the Uri attack, Modi chose to add context to the larger Indo-Pak skirmishes along the Line of Control.

"In the last few months, on 17 occasions, fidayeen have tried to infiltrate into India. Our soldiers have killed 110 of them," Modi said. "In one attack the neighbouring country succeeded and 18 soldiers died. If they had succeeded in all 17, can you imagine what might have happened? But our brave soldiers prevented those efforts, they slayed them on the LoC."

Until this point, Modi had yet to even name Pakistan, although he spoke of a "neighbouring nation" that exported terror. Instead, he sought to focus more on the demoralising news of 18 soldiers killed in an attack and said that they were unfortunate casualties of a larger war which, in his telling, India is by and large successful at.

Then the speech brought up another surprise. Standing on a platform in Kerala, speaking to an audience of BJP members at a party conclave, Modi decided to directly address the people of Pakistan – first pointing out that they once were the same as Indians.

"I would like to tell the people of Pakistan that before 1947, your ancestors too used to salute this great land," he said. "Leaders of the neighbouring country used to say they will fight for 1000 years against us. I accept this challenge."

He took this a step further still – making a point that will surely provoke many across the border. "That day is not far when people of Pakistan will get in the fray to fight against their leaders and terrorists," Modi said.

Addressing Pakistan's international policy of focusing on Kashmir, rather than terrorism, Modi again made an unusual choice. "The people of Pakistan please ask your leaders, you have PoK, you could not manage it. Bangladesh used to be yours, you couldn't manage it. You cannot handle Gilgit, Baltistan, Balochistan, Sindh, and you are talking about Kashmir," he said.

Modi finished the speech making the usual noises about India fighting poverty, and becoming a country free of corruption, unemployment and crimes against women.

This is most likely the first of several indications we will get on how the Modi government, which like most Indian administrations, has had a difficult time managing its Pakistan policy, has shifted gears after Uri.

The prime minister is slated to give his fortnightly radio address, Mann ki Baat, on Sunday morning and on Monday evening, External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj will have a chance to address the world through a speech at the United Nations General Assembly. Those will add more clarity to the Indian position, at least rhetorically, though what is clear is that Modi sees no utility in ramping up the violent rhetoric and doesn't have any interest in talking directly to Pakistan's leaders at the moment either.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.

Play

In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.

Play

Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.

Play

The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.

Play

The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.