Political murders

Kannur killings: The heat is on Pinarayi Vijayan over rising political violence in his backyard

The Kerala chief minister is under attack after two murders in three days in his hometown, while a corruption case involving a key aide adds to his troubles.

Pinarayi is a sleepy little village 20 km from Kannur in North Kerala. It is perhaps best known as the home town of Pinarayi Vijayan, chief minister and leader of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in the state. But a recent surge in political violence here has brought the spotlight on the nondescript village and its most famous resident.

On Wednesday, a Bharatiya Janata Party worker was hacked to death barely a kilometer from the chief minister’s home, allegedly by workers of the ruling party. It came barely two days after suspected members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the BJP’s ideological parent, on Monday killed a CPI(M) branch secretary in Dharmadam – Vijayan’s Assembly constituency of which Pinarayi is a part.

The violence has triggered an outcry across the state, with questions being raised about Vijayan’s inability to maintain order and rein in his cadre even on his turf. The chief minister has not helped matters by appearing to politicise the killings instead of condemning them.

Addressing a party function on Wednesday, he said, “The RSS is trying to create a law and order situation in the state and it is very evident that they have the blessings of the central BJP leadership.”

The police claimed they could not contain the violence without the help of the political parties. “The efforts of the police alone cannot restore normalcy in Kannur,” said Inspector General Dinendra Kashyap of the Kannur Range. “If political parties are engaged in this madness of killing each other, what can we do?”

Critics of the government accused it of ignoring the district administration’s appeals to call an all-party meeting – the norm whenever political violence flares up in Kannur – and said that by being a mute spectator, it was taking on the role of a passive partner in the crimes.

The BJP, on its part, called for a state-wide strike on Thursday and the intervention of the Central government, calling the situation a “complete breakdown of law and order in the state”.

The party is desperate to make inroads in Kerala, encouraged by its performance in the Assembly elections earlier this year when it opened its account in a state so far dominated by the politics of alliances led by the CPI(M) and the Congress.

The party’s central leadership was reportedly furious that the latest killing came within a day of BJP workers in Delhi marching to the CPI(M) headquarters in protest.

In this power tussle, the saffron brigade in Kerala has found an unlikely partner – the Congress, which has called for Vijayan to relinquish the home portfolio he holds in addition to the chief minister’s post.

“The chief minister has lost the moral responsibility to continue holding the home portfolio,” said state Congress chief VM Sudheeran. “He has completely failed to maintain law and order. Vijayan is behaving more like a party secretary than a chief minister.”

Power centre

In fact, this is what most of Vijayan’s detractors have to say.

Vijayan is the top leader of the CPI(M) in Kerala and the state’s chief minister, a position he faced no competition for from the moment elections were announced. Even his worst critics then believed he was an able administrator and expected him to deliver.

But today, they allege he is still behaving like the party state secretary he was for 10 years before becoming chief minister. They point to his response to various issues in the past few months as proof of this.

In the case of the RSS worker’s murder, for instance, the elected head of the state should have treated it as a crime and taken an appropriate stand. Instead, he chose to play politics over it.

“There is a certain weight in the argument when you say Vijayan is behaving like a party secretary,” said civil rights activist CR Neelakandan. “Otherwise, how can a chief minister justify a revenge killing, whatever the reason?”

He added, “If Vijayan wants to be an efficient administrator, the police under him should be able to act impartially and people should feel safe whatever their political allegiance.”

There is another line of thought on Vijayan’s response to the ongoing political violence, and that is that he is the absolute power in the party in his state. He may not be party secretary anymore but there is hardly anyone in the Kerala CPI(M) to challenge his authority on crucial decisions.

Therefore, many believe that whatever step the party takes in Kannur has the chief minister’s blessings. They believe Vijayan still heads what many call the Kannur lobby, which runs the CPI(M) and, to a large extent, the government.

“When the police themselves are saying they cannot prevent violence in the chief minister’s own panchayat, what should we understand from it?,” asked BJP general secretary K Surendran. “The chief minister went on to say in the Assembly that whatever is happening in Kannur is revenge killing. So, is the government clearing the ground for people to commit revenge killings? Nothing happens without Pinarayi Vijayan’s knowledge.”

It is an allegation Vijayan will find tough to prove otherwise in the backdrop of the growing violence in his backyard.

History of violence

As pressure mounts on Vijayan to stop the killings in Kannur, many point out that the violence is not a recent phenomenon but one that goes back over half a century. The tensions that flared in the 1960s between the then Praja Socialist Party and the Communist Party of India passed on to other political players. Down the years, the torchbearers changed hands but Kannur’s temperament for violent politics remained.

At present, the CPI(M) appears to be willing to go to any length to hold on to one of its strongest citadels in the country. But others like the BJP, Congress and even the Muslim League also want a piece of Kannur. The result is that anyone who comes close to questioning the communist party’s supremacy is shown blood. This leads to retaliation and killing scores are maintained by both sides. The violence takes a temporary halt only when scores are level.

More than 250 lives have been lost in the last five decades, according to official data, though the unofficial figure is perhaps higher.

In the four months since the CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front came to power in Kerala with a brute majority, Kannur has seen seven political killings and 116 cases of violence, most of them with no conclusion.

Twenty six-year-old BJP worker Ramith became the latest casualty of this violence on Wednesday. His murder was reportedly in retaliation to that of CPI(M) branch secretary Mohanan barely 48 hours before.

Ramith is survived by his mother and sister. His father Uthaman, who was a member of the RSS-affiliated Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, was hacked to death in 2002, also allegedly by CPI(M) workers. His grandmother died in a bomb attack on Uthaman’s funeral procession.

There are hundreds of such families in Kannur, on either side of the political divide, that bear the scars of this violent politics.

CPI(M) versus RSS

As the CPI(M) and the RSS carry on with their violent politics in Kannur, its effects are starting to spill over, perhaps for the first time, into other parts of the state.

A BJP worker was killed in Thiruvananthapuram and a bomb hurled at the party’s headquarters in the city by suspected CPI(M) workers a few months ago. The trigger was violence that erupted in Pinarayi in May within hours of the election results being announced. Suspected BJP and RSS workers had then attacked a CPI(M) victory procession and killed a party worker.

Tensions between the parties hit a peak in July when the CPI(M) state secretary Kodiyeri Balakrishnan called on his comrades to “give it back” to the RSS if provoked. The BJP demanded a case be filed against Balakrishnan for inciting violence, but there was no investigation or action against him.

There were even reports of the state government contemplating a ban on RSS activities in Kerala with the chief minister saying the saffron organisation should be kept out of temples, where it has a sizeable presence.

On Thursday, the state-wide strike called by the BJP resulted in businesses and educational institutions staying shut and vehicles keeping off roads. There were reports of sporadic violence between workers from both sides. Kannur was peaceful for most of the day, save for a few minor clashes. But the question now is how long the fragile calm lasts till the knives come out again.

Top minister resigns

As the political violence and the growing chorus against it threaten to become Vijayan's biggest headache, the chief minister has other serious problems to contend with.

Kannur is facing a new threat – terrorism. The National Investigation Agency recently arrested six young men from the district on suspicion of being linked to the Islamic State, giving rise to fears that the place has become a recruitment ground for the terrorist group.

To add to the government's problems, a new controversy emerged last week, embroiling Industries Minister EP Jayarajan – who also holds the sports portfolio and is said to be the chief minister's right hand man – in a corruption case. On Friday, Jayarajan, who is accused of getting his family members top positions in public sector companies overseen by his ministry, resigned. The announcement came after a meeting of the state secretariat that was attended by Vijayan and Balakrishan.

The scandal is a big blow to the CPI(M), which came to power on the promise of corruption-free governance. In the last few days, the government had come under attack from the Congress-led United Democratic Front and the BJP on the issue.

CPI(M) leaders, however, sought to turn the development around by saying the "tough action" against Jayarajan would bolster the party's image. Balakrishnan told reporters Jayarajan had resigned to "uphold the party's image and set an exemplary model in contrast to the previous Congress-led UDF government".

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content  BY 

As India turns 70, London School of Economics asks some provocative questions

Is India ready to become a global superpower?

Meaningful changes have always been driven by the right, but inconvenient questions. As India completes 70 years of its sovereign journey, we could do two things – celebrate, pay our token tributes and move on, or take the time to reflect and assess if our course needs correction. The ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, the annual flagship summit of the LSE (London School of Economics) South Asia Centre, is posing some fundamental but complex questions that define our future direction as a nation. Through an honest debate – built on new research, applied knowledge and ground realities – with an eclectic mix of thought leaders and industry stalwarts, this summit hopes to create a thought-provoking discourse.

From how relevant (or irrelevant) is our constitutional framework, to how we can beat the global one-upmanship games, from how sincere are business houses in their social responsibility endeavours to why water is so crucial to our very existence as a strong nation, these are some crucial questions that the event will throw up and face head-on, even as it commemorates the 70th anniversary of India’s independence.

Is it time to re-look at constitution and citizenship in India?

The Constitution of India is fundamental to the country’s identity as a democratic power. But notwithstanding its historical authority, is it perhaps time to examine its relevance? The Constitution was drafted at a time when independent India was still a young entity. So granting overwhelming powers to the government may have helped during the early years. But in the current times, they may prove to be more discriminatory than egalitarian. Our constitution borrowed laws from other countries and continues to retain them, while the origin countries have updated them since then. So, do we need a complete overhaul of the constitution? An expert panel led by Dr Mukulika Banerjee of LSE, including political and economic commentator S Gurumurthy, Madhav Khosla of Columbia University, Niraja Gopal Jayal of JNU, Chintan Chandrachud the author of the book Balanced Constitutionalism and sociologist, legal researcher and Director of Council for Social Development Kalpana Kannabiran will seek answers to this.

Is CSR simply forced philanthropy?

While India pioneered the mandatory minimum CSR spend, has it succeeded in driving impact? Corporate social responsibility has many dynamics at play. Are CSR initiatives mere tokenism for compliance? Despite government guidelines and directives, are CSR activities well-thought out initiatives, which are monitored and measured for impact? The CSR stipulations have also spawned the proliferation of ambiguous NGOs. The session, ‘Does forced philanthropy work – CSR in India?” will raise these questions of intent, ethics and integrity. It will be moderated by Professor Harry Barkema and have industry veterans such as Mukund Rajan (Chairman, Tata Council for Community Initiatives), Onkar S Kanwar (Chairman and CEO, Apollo Tyres), Anu Aga (former Chairman, Thermax) and Rahul Bajaj (Chairman, Bajaj Group) on the panel.

Can India punch above its weight to be considered on par with other super-powers?

At 70, can India mobilize its strengths and galvanize into the role of a serious power player on the global stage? The question is related to the whole new perception of India as a dominant power in South Asia rather than as a Third World country, enabled by our foreign policies, defense strategies and a buoyant economy. The country’s status abroad is key in its emergence as a heavyweight but the foreign service officers’ cadre no longer draws top talent. Is India equipped right for its aspirations? The ‘India Abroad: From Third World to Regional Power’ panel will explore India’s foreign policy with Ashley Tellis, Meera Shankar (Former Foreign Secretary), Kanwal Sibal (Former Foreign Secretary), Jayant Prasad and Rakesh Sood.

Are we under-estimating how critical water is in India’s race ahead?

At no other time has water as a natural resource assumed such a big significance. Studies estimate that by 2025 the country will become ‘water–stressed’. While water has been the bone of contention between states and controlling access to water, a source for political power, has water security received the due attention in economic policies and development plans? Relevant to the central issue of water security is also the issue of ‘virtual water’. Virtual water corresponds to the water content (used) in goods and services, bulk of which is in food grains. Through food grain exports, India is a large virtual net exporter of water. In 2014-15, just through export of rice, India exported 10 trillion litres of virtual water. With India’s water security looking grim, are we making the right economic choices? Acclaimed author and academic from the Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, Amita Bavisar will moderate the session ‘Does India need virtual water?’

Delve into this rich confluence of ideas and more at the ‘India @ 70: LSE India Summit’, presented by Apollo Tyres in association with the British Council and organized by Teamworks Arts during March 29-31, 2017 at the India Habitat Centre, New Delhi. To catch ‘India @ 70’ live online, register here.

At the venue, you could also visit the Partition Museum. Dedicated to the memory of one of the most conflict-ridden chapters in our country’s history, the museum will exhibit a unique archive of rare photographs, letters, press reports and audio recordings from The Partition Museum, Amritsar.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Teamwork Arts and not by the Scroll editorial team.