Kashmir Report

Kashmir is still seeking alternatives to the ‘non-lethal pellets’ that have blinded scores of people

PAVA shells were recommended as a substitute. While potent in theory, they have proved to be ineffective in practice.

Kashmir slowly limps towards normalcy as violence ebbs on its streets. The human cost of the unrest since July 9 has been catastrophic, with at least 93 people killed and thousands injured, both civilians and security forces.

Much was earlier made of using “non-lethal pellet guns” as a means of crowd-control. But as deaths of protestors and bystanders mounted, and as reports of grievous injuries caused to many of them by these so-called non-lethal pellets spread, it was gradually revealed that these were actually 12 gauge pump-action shotguns.

Following an outrage over those being treated for eye injuries, caused by pellets fired from these guns, that were potentially irreversible, Home Minister Rajnath Singh on July 26 approved the formation of an expert committee to find alternative methods of crowd control.

The committee in August recommended PAVA shells, comprising of chilli-based smoke, as an alternative.

Security forces on the ground, however, say these shells are only as effective as tear gas and are not a strong deterrent if protests occur in open areas.

Blown away

PAVA – Pelargonic acid vanillylamide – is an organic compound present in chillies that can also be synthetically manufactured. The much hyped alternative consists of the chemical as the payload in shells and is said to be much more potent than tear smoke.

But that is in theory. In practice, Rajesh Yadav, Central Reserved Police Force commandant, said PAVA shells were “like any tear smoke shell. ”Their effectiveness,” he said, “depended upon where they are deployed: effective if used in closed lanes and ineffective if used in open spaces.”

Despite their potency, the use of PAVA shells hasn’t been of much help as security forces have had to tackle mobs in open areas. Unlike the previous unrests, as in 2010 when urban areas were centres of protests, agitations this time have swept rural areas with large fields and open spaces.

Wind direction plays an important role as winds often direct the smoke away from protestors, making the shells ineffective.

“Even with the current potency,” a senior police official told Scroll.in, “the shells are not effective in dispersing the crowd.”

Stone pelting has become a regular activity in the valley, locally known as kani-jung or kani-ladai (stone wars). Over time, experienced stone pelters also learn to pick up and throw back the tear smoke shells at the forces.

The slow discharge from the shells makes it easier for the pelters. “They throw it back as it starts discharging,” the police officer added. “That is a disadvantage.”

Yadav, however, pointed out that these smoke shells are fired using launchers over distances of 100-130 yards.

“Even if the shells are thrown back, the wind might take them back towards the pelters,” Yadav said.”They [Stone pelters] can, at the maximum, throw them some 30-40 yards towards us.”

Based on feedback from forces, the Central government is said to be considering a reconfiguration of the PAVA shells to enhance their potency and effectiveness, PTI reported.

No alternative?

The ineffectiveness of the PAVA shells and other non-lethal weapons that were tried during the unrest leaves security forces with no better alternatives amid the mounting injuries caused due to pellets fired from pump-action shotguns.

The unprecedented upheaval in the initial days of the protests in July saw angry mobs attacking security forces camps. Countless incidents of stone pelting on security forces were reported across the valley.

The CRPF in its affidavit to the Jammu and Kashmir High Court in August said “In case, this (pellets fired from pump-action gun) is withdrawn from the options available with the CRPF, CRPF personnel would have no recourse in extreme situations but to open fire with rifles, which may cause more fatalities.”

It also informed the court that 3000 pellet cartridges were used in a span of 32 days, between July 8 and August 11. These so-called non-lethal pump-action guns were introduced in the valley after the 2010 unrest in which at least 120 protestors were killed.

Since July 8, at least four civilians, including a minor girl, have lost vision in both eyes while dozens have been blinded in one eye or left visually impaired due to pellets.

Two minor boys, not part of violent mobs, have been killed by pellets. On August 4, an ATM guard was killed by pellets fired at close range. More than 300 pellets were found in his body.

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court on September 22 declined to ban these pump-action guns. “So long as there is violence by unruly mobs,” the Court said, “use of force is inevitable.”

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

People who fall through the gaps in road safety campaigns

Helmet and road safety campaigns might have been neglecting a sizeable chunk of the public at risk.

City police, across the country, have been running a long-drawn campaign on helmet safety. In a recent initiative by the Bengaluru Police, a cop dressed-up as ‘Lord Ganesha’ offered helmets and roses to two-wheeler riders. Earlier this year, a 12ft high and 9ft wide helmet was installed in Kota as a memorial to the victims of road accidents. As for the social media leg of the campaign, the Mumbai Police made a pop-culture reference to drive the message of road safety through their Twitter handle.

But, just for the sake of conversation, how much safety do helmets provide anyway?

Lack of physical protections put two-wheeler riders at high risk on the road. According to a recent report by the World Health Organisation (WHO), more than 1.25 million people die each year as a result of road traffic crashes. Nearly half of those dying on the world’s roads are ‘vulnerable road users’ – pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists. According to the Indian transport ministry, about 28 two-wheeler riders died daily on Indian roads in 2016 for not wearing helmets.

The WHO states that wearing a motorcycle helmet correctly can reduce the risk of death by almost 40% and the risk of severe injury by over 70%. The components of a helmet are designed to reduce impact of a force collision to the head. A rigid outer shell distributes the impact over a large surface area, while the soft lining absorbs the impact.

However, getting two-wheeler riders to wear protective headgear has always been an uphill battle, one that has intensified through the years owing to the lives lost due on the road. Communication tactics are generating awareness about the consequences of riding without a helmet and changing behaviour that the law couldn’t on its own. But amidst all the tag-lines, slogans and get-ups that reach out to the rider, the safety of the one on the passenger seat is being ignored.

Pillion rider safety has always been second in priority. While several state governments are making helmets for pillion riders mandatory, the lack of awareness about its importance runs deep. In Mumbai itself, only 1% of the 20 lakh pillion riders wear helmets. There seems to be this perception that while two-wheeler riders are safer wearing a helmet, their passengers don’t necessarily need one. Statistics prove otherwise. For instance, in Hyderabad, the Cyberabad traffic police reported that 1 of every 3 two-wheeler deaths was that of a pillion rider. DGP Chander, Goa, stressed that 71% of fatalities in road accidents in 2017 were of two-wheeler rider and pillion riders of which 66% deaths were due to head injury.

Despite the alarming statistics, pillion riders, who are as vulnerable as front riders to head-injuries, have never been the focus of helmet awareness and safety drives. To fill-up that communication gap, Reliance General Insurance has engineered a campaign, titled #FaceThePace, that focusses solely on pillion rider safety. The campaign film tells a relatable story of a father taking his son for cricket practice on a motorbike. It then uses cricket to bring our attention to a simple flaw in the way we think about pillion rider safety – using a helmet to play a sport makes sense, but somehow, protecting your head while riding on a two-wheeler isn’t considered.

This road safety initiative by Reliance General Insurance has taken the lead in addressing the helmet issue as a whole — pillion or front, helmets are crucial for two-wheeler riders. The film ensures that we realise how selective our worry about head injury is by comparing the statistics of children deaths due to road accidents to fatal accidents on a cricket ground. Message delivered. Watch the video to see how the story pans out.


To know more about Reliance general insurance policies, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Reliance General Insurance and not by the Scroll editorial team.