note demonetisation

Demonetisation: India's unbanked population would be the world's 7th-largest country

Larger than Bangladesh or Japan.

Banks are no longer be permitted to exchange older Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 notes over the counter for new ones. When he announced the demonetisation of higher-value notes on November 8, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said that everyone would be able to exchange up only to Rs 4,000 in cash until November 24, after which the limit would be increased. Instead, on Friday, the finance ministry said it was ending cash exchanges altogether.

“It has been observed that over the counter exchange of the old currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 denomination has shown a declining trend,” the ministry said in a release. “Consequently, there will be no over the counter exchange of old Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes after midnight of 24.11.2016.”

Those who still have older notes have the option of depositing this money in their bank accounts. Unless, that is, they don’t have bank accounts.

India’s unbanked

Because of India’s sheer scale, that is not a negligible number of people.

A report prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers India in 2015 pointed out that India’s unbanked population that year was 233 million. This was half the number it was in 2011, at 557 million, primarily because of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana scheme aimed at making it easier for people to open new accounts. Since that report, in October 2015, the Jan Dhan Yojana has grown even further, adding 68 million accounts as of the most recent report on November 9, 2016.

Presuming every single Jan Dhan Yojana account has gone to a new user, that still leaves about 165 million people unbanked. Allowing for the Jan Dhan’s aim of opening bank accounts for every household (of an average of four people), rather than individual, that brings this number to 41 million households.

If that entire unbanked population were a country, it would be the world’s eighth largest nation – more populous than even Bangladesh.

Surveys carried out by banks under the Jan Dhan Yojana in 2015 found that 99.99% of the 21 crore households they reached out to had opened bank accounts. The government and RBI have also made efforts to use other avenues to increase access to banking, such as giving licences to payment banks, allowing India’s Post Offices to be leveraged that way. Yet, despite this, the Centre acknowledged in June this year that 40% of the country is “outside the ambit of formal banking”.

Financial inclusion

The Finance Ministry’s press release did address this too. “It has further been felt that people may be encouraged and facilitated to deposit their old Rs. 500 and Rs 1,000 notes in their bank accounts,” it said, on Friday. “This will encourage people who are still unbanked, to open new bank accounts.”

It’s possible that some of those households that are unbanked were already able to exchange the cash that they had or can rely on informal networks to do so. But that still leaves potentially millions more who have to now open bank accounts – at a time when most banks are still struggling to deal with the massive rush.

Many of these will have trouble opening accounts even if they had the one identity card that had allowed them to exchange cash earlier, but no valid current or permanent address proof that a Jan Dhan account requires. Anecdotal evidence suggests that banks also don’t have the capacity to handle new account openings while they continue to deal with the massive pressure of people depositing older currency.

Banking pressure

Even if they do manage to open an account though, if the government continues to use these tactics to force people into using the banking system, it will put the already stretched industry under further strain. India has only 18 ATMs per 100,000 adults, compared to a global average of 43. It has only 13.4 bank branches per 100,000 adults, in line with the world average but far behind any country that can claim to be primarily cashless.

Business correspondents, the people whose job it is to do small banking transactions in areas where there are no branches, are already under strain as a result of the demonetisation. They are allowed to assist with opening of accounts, but the KYC formalities will nevertheless have to be done by branches.

India’s central bank, after notifying this new sudden change, did allow for some leeway.

  “The Reserve Bank of India advises members of public that exchange of banknotes in Rs 500 and Rs 1000 denominations, whose legal tender status has been withdrawn, will continue to be available at the counters of the Reserve Bank upto the current limits per person as hitherto. (However such exchange facility is no longer available at other banks’ counters).”  

If they want to, those 165 million Indians who haven’t been able to open an account can now go exchange their cash at RBI’s nationwide network of just 19 regional offices and nine sub-offices.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.

Play

In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.

Play

Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.

Play

The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.

Play

The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.