Jallikattu debate

Fact-check: Little evidence that 'foreign' A1 alternative to jallikattu cattle milk causes cancer

The most conclusive report so far links A1 milk to poor digestion. For the rest, scientists are divided.

As with any other large-scale protest in India today, ongoing demonstrations in support of jallikattu in Tamil Nadu have also come with a swirl of social media messages promoting their cause. Among the several forwards asserting Tamil federalism or viciously trolling the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals that are bouncing around in Whatsapp and Facebook groups is a curious set of claims about A1 and A2 milk.

Variants of this message describe how the milk of indigenous cattle is superior to that of foreign cows. Foreign cows, the messages say, produce A1 milk, whereas Indian cows produce A2 milk. A1 milk, the messages say, cause a host of medical conditions including autism, schizophrenia, cancer and diabetes. The proposed ban on jallikattu, it is claimed, is a nefarious plan by PETA to help foreign medical companies profit from Indian illness.

But what is A1 and A2 milk and can A1 milk really cause cancer?

Simply put, cattle milk contains several proteins. One of these proteins is beta-casein. There are two variants of beta-casein, A1 and A2, from which the terms A1 milk and A2 milk derive. The A1 type of beta-casein breaks down to release a peptide called beta-casomorphin-7. (Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins and a peptide is a chain of two or more amino acids.)

A1 milk is found largely in northern European breeds of cattle, while Asian and African breeds produce A2 milk. This production is determined by their genetic makeup. This is why even though it is cows that produce milk, even the bulls of a particular breed are important in maintaining its production.

Since the early 2000s, there have been papers and articles suggesting that BCM-7 might actually be harmful to humans. But in 2009, the European Food Safety Authority conducted a review of literature available up to that date and concluded that any links were inconclusive. Most significantly, it found little evidence of BCM-7 having entered the blood stream.

What is clear is that even today, far more research is needed to establish clear links between BCM-7 and diseases. These studies will have to include testing of human subjects and long-term studies.

At best, BCM-7 might be linked with lactose intolerance and digestion issues. A study on 45 lactose-intolerant Chinese Han subjects found that they experienced greater symptoms of flatulence and bloating when consuming a mixture of A1 and A2 milk than when consuming only A2 milk.

A1 and A2 in India?

Setting aside BCM-7, how relevant is the A1 and A2 milk debate in India?

Whatsapp messages take particular care to note that the Jersey cow produces only A1 milk. The Indian government has promoted this breed of cows to farmers for its capacity to produce greater quantities of milk than indigenous ones.

Studies abroad have found evidence of A1 milk in cattle breeds of Europe, such as Holstein and Friesian cows. These studies also conclude that Jersey cows produce mostly A2 milk.

Indian researchers too have been studying A1 and A2 beta caseins. The National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources even charges Rs 700 to determine the presence of either in milk samples.

In a 2011 survey of cows in India, the bureau concluded that five indigenous breeds – Gir, Rathi, Red Sindhi, Sahiwal and Tharparkar – have 100% A2 beta caseins. Other indigenous breeds, their study said, had up to 94% of this protein. It is not clear if the bureau analysed kangayams, the breed most commonly used for jallikattu, in its research.

The bureau also studied foreign cattle present in India and found, contrary to European and Australian studies, most foreign breeds of cattle produced up to 60% A2 beta-caseins and 40% A1.

Even supposing that one consumes milk only from foreign breeds present in India, the average daily consumption, notes Dr Abdul Samad, former dean of the Bombay Veterinary College, would be far less than that of people in European countries, where studies linking A1 beta-casein to diseases have been conducted.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

India’s urban water crisis calls for an integrated approach

We need solutions that address different aspects of the water eco-system and involve the collective participation of citizens and other stake-holders.

According to a UN report, around 1.2 billion people, or almost one fifth of the world’s population, live in areas where water is physically scarce and another 1.6 billion people, or nearly one quarter of the world’s population, face economic water shortage. They lack basic access to water. The criticality of the water situation across the world has in fact given rise to speculations over water wars becoming a distinct possibility in the future. In India the problem is compounded, given the rising population and urbanization. The Asian Development Bank has forecast that by 2030, India will have a water deficit of 50%.

Water challenges in urban India

For urban India, the situation is critical. In 2015, about 377 million Indians lived in urban areas and by 2030, the urban population is expected to rise to 590 million. Already, according to the National Sample Survey, only 47% of urban households have individual water connections and about 40% to 50% of water is reportedly lost in distribution systems due to various reasons. Further, as per the 2011 census, only 32.7% of urban Indian households are connected to a piped sewerage system.

Any comprehensive solution to address the water problem in urban India needs to take into account the specific challenges around water management and distribution:

Pressure on water sources: Rising demand on water means rising pressure on water sources, especially in cities. In a city like Mumbai for example, 3,750 Million Litres per Day (MLD) of water, including water for commercial and industrial use, is available, whereas 4,500 MLD is needed. The primary sources of water for cities like Mumbai are lakes created by dams across rivers near the city. Distributing the available water means providing 386,971 connections to the city’s roughly 13 million residents. When distribution becomes challenging, the workaround is to tap ground water. According to a study by the Centre for Science and Environment, 48% of urban water supply in India comes from ground water. Ground water exploitation for commercial and domestic use in most cities is leading to reduction in ground water level.

Distribution and water loss issues: Distribution challenges, such as water loss due to theft, pilferage, leaky pipes and faulty meter readings, result in unequal and unregulated distribution of water. In New Delhi, for example, water distribution loss was reported to be about 40% as per a study. In Mumbai, where most residents get only 2-5 hours of water supply per day, the non-revenue water loss is about 27% of the overall water supply. This strains the municipal body’s budget and impacts the improvement of distribution infrastructure. Factors such as difficult terrain and legal issues over buildings also affect water supply to many parts. According to a study, only 5% of piped water reaches slum areas in 42 Indian cities, including New Delhi. A 2011 study also found that 95% of households in slum areas in Mumbai’s Kaula Bunder district, in some seasons, use less than the WHO-recommended minimum of 50 litres per capita per day.

Water pollution and contamination: In India, almost 400,000 children die every year of diarrhea, primarily due to contaminated water. According to a 2017 report, 630 million people in the South East Asian countries, including India, use faeces-contaminated drinking water source, becoming susceptible to a range of diseases. Industrial waste is also a major cause for water contamination, particularly antibiotic ingredients released into rivers and soils by pharma companies. A Guardian report talks about pollution from drug companies, particularly those in India and China, resulting in the creation of drug-resistant superbugs. The report cites a study which indicates that by 2050, the total death toll worldwide due to infection by drug resistant bacteria could reach 10 million people.

A holistic approach to tackling water challenges

Addressing these challenges and improving access to clean water for all needs a combination of short-term and medium-term solutions. It also means involving the community and various stakeholders in implementing the solutions. This is the crux of the recommendations put forth by BASF.

The proposed solutions, based on a study of water issues in cities such as Mumbai, take into account different aspects of water management and distribution. Backed by a close understanding of the cost implications, they can make a difference in tackling urban water challenges. These solutions include:

Recycling and harvesting: Raw sewage water which is dumped into oceans damages the coastal eco-system. Instead, this could be used as a cheaper alternative to fresh water for industrial purposes. According to a 2011 World Bank report, 13% of total freshwater withdrawal in India is for industrial use. What’s more, the industrial demand for water is expected to grow at a rate of 4.2% per year till 2025. Much of this demand can be met by recycling and treating sewage water. In Mumbai for example, 3000 MLD of sewage water is released, almost 80% of fresh water availability. This can be purified and utilised for industrial needs. An example of recycled sewage water being used for industrial purpose is the 30 MLD waste water treatment facility at Gandhinagar and Anjar in Gujarat set up by Welspun India Ltd.

Another example is the proposal by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (NMMC) to recycle and reclaim sewage water treated at its existing facilities to meet the secondary purposes of both industries and residential complexes. In fact, residential complexes can similarly recycle and re-use their waste water for secondary purposes such as gardening.

Also, alternative rain water harvesting methods such as harvesting rain water from concrete surfaces using porous concrete can be used to supplement roof-top rain water harvesting, to help replenish ground water.

Community initiatives to supplement regular water supply: Initiatives such as community water storage and decentralised treatment facilities, including elevated water towers or reservoirs and water ATMs, based on a realistic understanding of the costs involved, can help support the city’s water distribution. Water towers or elevated reservoirs with onsite filters can also help optimise the space available for water distribution in congested cities. Water ATMs, which are automated water dispensing units that can be accessed with a smart card or an app, can ensure metered supply of safe water.

Testing and purification: With water contamination being a big challenge, the adoption of affordable and reliable multi-household water filter systems which are electricity free and easy to use can help, to some extent, access to safe drinking water at a domestic level. Also, the use of household water testing kits and the installation of water quality sensors on pipes, that send out alerts on water contamination, can create awareness of water contamination and drive suitable preventive steps.

Public awareness and use of technology: Public awareness campaigns, tax incentives for water conservation and the use of technology interfaces can also go a long way in addressing the water problem. For example, measures such as water credits can be introduced with tax benefits as incentives for efficient use and recycling of water. Similarly, government water apps, like that of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, can be used to spread tips on water saving, report leakage or send updates on water quality.

Collaborative approach: Finally, a collaborative approach like the adoption of a public-private partnership model for water projects can help. There are already examples of best practices here. For example, in Netherlands, water companies are incorporated as private companies, with the local and national governments being majority shareholders. Involving citizens through social business models for decentralised water supply, treatment or storage installations like water ATMs, as also the appointment of water guardians who can report on various aspects of water supply and usage can help in efficient water management. Grass-root level organizations could be partnered with for programmes to spread awareness on water safety and conservation.

For BASF, the proposed solutions are an extension of their close engagement with developing water management and water treatment solutions. The products developed specially for waste and drinking water treatment, such as Zetag® ULTRA and Magnafloc® LT, focus on ensuring sustainability, efficiency and cost effectiveness in the water and sludge treatment process.

BASF is also associated with operations of Reliance Industries’ desalination plant at Jamnagar in Gujarat.The thermal plant is designed to deliver up to 170,000 cubic meters of processed water per day. The use of inge® ultrafiltration technologies allows a continuous delivery of pre-filtered water at a consistent high-quality level, while the dosage of the Sokalan® PM 15 I protects the desalination plant from scaling. This combination of BASF’s expertise minimises the energy footprint of the plant and secures water supply independent of the seasonal fluctuations. To know more about BASF’s range of sustainable solutions and innovative chemical products for the water industry, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of BASF and not by the Scroll editorial team.