political churn

Resignation of Congress’ Kerala chief gives high command a chance to mend ties with Oommen Chandy

There is a strong likelihood that the party selects Chandy or his loyalists for the post vacated by VM Sudheeran.

Congress leader VM Sudheeran sprang a surprise on the party leadership when he resigned as president of the Kerala unit on Friday.

Sudheeran cited ill health as the reason for stepping down as Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee president and insisted his decision had nothing to do with issues in the party.

However, Sudheeran had been under tremendous pressure to quit as state president ever since the Congress-led United Democratic Front government lost the Assembly elections in Kerala last May. Two dominant factions within the party that has been torn apart by infighting in recent years – group A and group I – had been baying for his blood.

While the A group owes its allegiance to former Kerala Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, the I group is led by Ramesh Chennithala, leader of Opposition in the Kerala Assembly.

Sudheeran’s resignation presents a huge opportunity to Chandy, his bête noire, who had resigned from all party posts after the Congress’ defeat in the state polls last year and had felt sidelined by the top leadership in recent months. Political analysts believe that the party could use this as a chance to placate Chandy by appointing his loyalist – or even the former chief minister himself – in Sudheeran’s place.

Tension within

The latest bone of contention between Chandy and Sudheeran was the revamp of District Congress Committees, as part of the reorganisation of the party’s state network after the 2016 poll debacle.

In December, when the names of new presidents to the 14 district committees were announced Chandy, felt that his loyalists had been sidelined. The list had been declared by Sudheeran and finalised with the Gandhis’ approval, with more members of Chennithala’s group finding their names on the list. The Congress leadership had also not paid heed to Chandy’s suggestion that the district presidents be chosen by vote and not through the nomination route.

Upset by the selection, Chandy boycotted the All India Congress Committee’s protest against the Central government’s demonetisation move in New Delhi in December and also kept away from the party’s parliamentary affairs committee meeting held in Thiruvananthapuram in January.

Sudheeran’s exit offers the party’s top leadership an opportunity to make amends with Chandy, the party’s tallest leader in Kerala. The high command knows Chandy’s support will be crucial to ensure the party’s growth in the state.

Keeping it together

When Sudheeran was made the state party chief in 2014, the Congress leadership hoped that his credibility would help him curb the factionalism in the party.

But Sudheeran soon found out that factional politics – that began more than five decades ago and gathered strength in the early ‘70s – were harder to control than expected. He could not dismantle the camps and unite the party during his three year and stint at the at the helm.

Given this, the Congress high command is likely to pick the new Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee chief from one of the two factions. Political observers believe that the Gandhis would prefer a Chandy loyalist at the helm to pacify the former chief minister.

However, though the party is yet to begin its search for a replacement, many aspirants have thrown their hat into the ring. Prominent among them are Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee Vice-President VD Satheeshan, Ernakulam MP KV Thomas and Thrikkakkara MLA, PT Thomas.

There is also speculation that Chandy himself is mulling taking over the reins. Though he has maintained that he would not take up any official posts in the party, Chandy indicated a softening in stance when he told media persons at a function on Sunday that the party high command would take a final decision about the Kerala Pradesh Congress Comittee chief.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.