Letters to the editor

Readers' comments: 'Pouring venom on Yogi Adityanath will only strengthen his resolve to work'

A selection of readers' opinions.

Yogi yug

The arguments given against Adityanath are pretty baseless (“Yogi Adityanath: ‘Give him a chance’ and six other meaningless arguments busted”). Do you know that a Muslim orphan once came to Adityanath and he adopted the kid and still lives with him happily? If you go to Gorakhpur, you can find a lot of Muslims openly supporting Adityanath, which further proves that he is not anti-Muslim.

People erroneously assume that pro-Hindutva means anti-Muslim. This is a big myth that must be busted. Some also think that Adityanath cannot bring development to Uttar Pradesh. This is yet another myth. Gorakhpur once again stands as proof – the work done by Adityanath here has benefited all communities. Uttar Pradesh, after suffering for the last 10 years, need someone a strong leader with vision for the development of state – most importantly, development for all without discrimination. – Chinmay Sarupria

These arguments were on the basis of his image and rhetoric. It would be insightful and helpful if there were ground reports from his constituency on the work he has done, on the the position of social indicators and other ground realities there. – Manraj Singh


Yes and on the other hand, we have a mother-son duo accused and out on bail in a massive corruption case leading another national party that dons the garb of secularism. I would love to see an article on Scroll.in on those two as well. – Sri Kotti


This is an excellent analysis of Adityanath being appointed chief minister of Uttar Pradesh.
I agree with Praveen Swamy when he says that it is like an arsonist being appointed head teacher. But this is a masterstroke by the BJP. The ploy is to appoint a gangster as a policeman, so that he will have to focus attention on maintaining peace instead of committing crimes. – VRH


People who voted in favour of the BJP and Adityanath are fools and the MLAs who unanimously chose him as leader are fool. Only writer of this article is wise, it appears.

The writer may have preferred the likes of Rahul Gandhi, Owaisi, Kejriwal, Rabri Devi, Lalu Yadav , Salman Khursid, Gulam Nabi Azad, Kanhaiya Kumar or Umar Khalid as the Uttar Pradesh chief minister.

Perhaps the writer not have faith in democracy, electoral procedures and provisions of Constitution. – Danendra Jain


Pouring venom like this will only strengthen his resolve to carry out his task. Why can not we expect him to do better things with the new responsibility? These are coloured views. – Madhu


It will not be surprising if all the cases against Adityanath were dropped, as was the case with Modi’s 2002 riots cases as well (“Yogi Adityanath as Uttar Pradesh chief minister: What happens to the cases against him?”). Or then, witnesses may recant or not turn up in court. This will be the method in all cases against any BJP official. – SN Iyer


The author has a holier than thou attitude (“Yogi Adityanath and Ramdev are the new BJP model of development-plus”). Does he have a solution to the religious anarchy in India in the name of secularism? We need food, water and shelter for all Indians. We don’t need lectures but action and development, which we have not seen since Independence. We are still a third-world country. We don’t need gods, just simple and honest Indians. – Subash Kumar


The author, Shiv Visvanathan, must be be aware that India is a democratic country and those in power have been democratically elected by the majority? Now if the majority has no problem with their leaders, who are you nincompoops to question their leadership? – Nitin Raval

Beyond belief

This is yet another comment from an ignorant and condescending moron trying to portray himself as a progressive and secular, writing about a crazy sect has nothing do with Hinduism (“Tempest in a teapot: A rebuttal to Reza Aslan’s critics from someone who’s lived with Aghoris”). The author clearly exhibits his utter bias against Hinduism and their believers both in India and US. They should not be allowed to vent their biases on Scroll.in. Let Reza Aslam and CNN produce a similar show on Islam to prove themselves impartial. – Mohan Ramaswami


This is the kind of well-argued response we need for discussions on religion and freedom of speech. The article exposes the jingoistic and casteist roots of the outrage against Reza Aslan while also calling him out for the exoticisation. Alongside, it also captures the spirituality and terribilità of the Aghoris! – Sonika Gupta


Interesting view. I’m also interested to see how Aslan speaks the purported truths of Islam. Will he talk about how modern Muslims in significant numbers support IS and still practice beheading? Will he talk in length about the Jizya tax on non-Muslims? Will he show a good old fashioned Islamic stoning? I am sure he will not, as there would be a fatwa against him and he will seek refuge in a non-Muslim country. – Satesh


Reza Aslan’s The Believer sensationalises the fringe movements of a great religion. His show is make-believe at best and mediocre at worst.

As someone who grew up in a Christian home in India and was raised by two liberal thinkers, I have always honoured the spirituality of any devout practitioner of a faith, in all its myriad and hybrid ways. Yet, it was difficult to watch the profanities of the Aghoris and believe that they do what they do to “transmute and ultimately transcend base sensations like fear, hatred or disgust”, as this article claims. In a limited world, with limited understanding of each other, we as a collective, have dualistic notions of right and wrong so that we will not be subject to relativism or to expediency. “Even God has boundaries,” my grandmother used to say, meaning, the Universe with all its pragmatic computations require their own algorithms.

I am touched to read that Aslan is “spiritually curious” (self-proclaimed, that is.) His attempt to understand Christianity, as detailed in his book, The Zealot is just that: an attempt. But I am confident that in time, given enough support, he will begin to understand the different ways of being in this world. – Sosanna Kuruvila

Nothing new

You should, almost always, believe in relativity. Should I infer that such a thing never happened before (“‘We aren’t scared’: A week after posters asked them to leave, Bareilly Muslims stand their ground”)? No, it has always happened in Uttar Pradesh during regime change. Get a grip! – Ashutosh Mishra

Taking a stand

Just when will the world learn to stand up against tyrants (“Thailand’s new king is moving the country away from being a constitutional monarchy”)? I refuse to refer to Bhumibol or his son, Rama X as king,. I simply do not respect by demand – I respect people who respect people.

Thailand has been cursed since June 9, 1946, when Thailand’s last, true ruler, King Ananda, was shot in his bed. Bhumi, his brother who was made king just hours later, has been quiet about the circumstances of King Ananda’s death ever since. No doubt, he’d been made keep quiet. Nevertheless, he had many chances to come forward. But instead, he enjoyed the respect he was being granted and the wealth he’d collected ever since be took the throne.

It is a shame on humanity itself, but most of all to Thailand’s population, to accept and respect such most despicable tyrant acts. Most Thai refer to Bhumi as their god, but if you ask them why, they wouldn’t be able tell you. That being said, who wouldn’t love someone when the price for disagreeing is so high? Think about it. Hitler was loved too. – Norbert Harms

Leading the way

This story reflects not just the difficulties this Dalit woman had to face, being widowed at a young age, but also the sufferings of agriculture labourers and their financial troubles (“How a Dalit woman found success as a farmer, years after her debt-ridden husband took his life”). She is a role model to the Dalit community in particular and poor agriculture workers in general. – Sheshu Kilambi

Spiritual questions

For a non-Baba lover, the writer has done a pretty good job on giving information about Meher Baba (“A Parsi baba who inspired The Who and met Gandhi is still drawing foreign believers to Maharashtra”). However, I do think you missed the part where years later, Mr Brunton reassessed his evaluation of Meher Baba and asserted He was a great spiritual master whom he respected.

You were also inaccurate, I believe, (and I spent over 20 years reading everything there was to know about Meher Baba) in saying that he occasionally ate mutton. To my knowledge, he never ate mutton and the only time he ate any meat was when it was presented to him on a flight – and it was spam, at that. His disciples were astonished and horrified that he was eating it and he made it a teaching moment. He said: “It is more important what comes out of your mouth (how you speak), than what goes into your mouth.”

Also, Baba-lovers do not go to India in the hopes that he will solve all their pains, as you said. Rather, they go to India to pledge inwardly to him that they will do all they can to love him more and to show him that they are leading the life he asked them to – by showing love to all around them! – David Bullock

Poaching controversy

Lewis Evans needs to get his head out of the sand (“Wildlife conservation needs a more humane approach than Kaziranga’s shoot-at-sight policy”)! It’s people like him, who hold all human life as sacrosanct, that contribute more to the problems of this planet. It doesn’t matter to Evans if these humans are evil murderers who will stop at nothing. Has Evans heard of the rhino orphanage, where indigenous people were caring for orphaned rhinos, that was broken into by poachers who shot and hacked off the horns of rescued babies (who had already experienced and survived the slaughtering of their mothers)? The poachers them beat and raped the women who were taking care of the rhinos for good measure, before leaving with their prizes.

But it would be inhumane and medieval to shoot people like that on sight, right? I wouldn’t want anyone with Evans’ views anywhere near me if I were a tribal woman working at a rhino orphanage. More people on this planet need to hold the lives of animals (and those that protect and treasure them) as important. Animals are more deserving of our protection than the parasites called humans that have taken over and are ruining the planet bit by bit, every day, by eliminating one creature at a time. – Wendy Kester

Negative view

It is a shame that the award has gone to Ravish Kumar (“‘We have become the consumers of tragedy’: Ravish Kumar on the Indian media’s political agenda”). It is a paid award. He is one of the most negative journalists. The same thing applies to your magazine. You are anti- establishment. We look forward to a frank but truthful journalism and not paid and biased like yours. – KYP Kulkarni


The award has been bestowed upon someone who is biased towards the Gandhi family. His every word is against the volunteer family or in your words, the Hindutva brigade.

We have seen his cowardly attitude during demonetisation, when asked the crowd what problems they faced because of the note ban but the people didn’t care for him. – Praseetha Shashidharan


Ravish Kumar is absolutely correct. The revival of the Congress and the Left parties is desperately needed to keep Indian polity balanced. The current environment is highly polarised. It’s a pity that most of the Indian media blindly panders to to the present establishment. – Varsha Varadarajan


It is not that we consume tragedy. The truth is that we are also masters at manufacturing tragedy. We take pride in portraying what is appreciated by our one-dimension view.
What you tell the public is what you believe and not what the public believes in. That is why a Modi happens or a Yogi comes along. – Pranesh Nagri

Surrogacy debate

Let us take the example of Karan Johar (“The surrogacy story: Beyond the Bollywood babies is an industry that needs regulation”). The producer has an elderly mother at home and no doubt has the resources to hire the best domestic and nursing help but is there someone else who will have parent-like attachment for the twins?

My wife and I love our grandchildren but we realised after our daughter’s ‎first child was born that we do not have the bandwidth to look after a small baby. We could some time in intervals loving and petting the baby but cleaning the baby, making its feed, carrying it for long spells and staying up late was beyond us. My daughter, a frail girl, who had not any domestic work all her life slipped into the role of mother seamlessly. This went on for nearly three years. She was sleep-deprived and dead tired but still says that these were the best years of her life.

She’s had a second child at 40 and is reliving this process with the same dedication and devotion. This is a mother for you. My daughter is no different from any Indian mother. In the Indian context, depriving a child of the mother’s care is cruel. A man having a surrogate child ‎in these circumstances is selfish.

A surrogate baby has a mother. Depriving the child of this mother’s care is immoral. In India this cannot be allowed. – JP Murty

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.


SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.