Letters to the editor

Readers’ comments: The phrase ‘nation wants to know’ had an effect only with Arnab Goswami’s magic

A selection of readers’ opinions.

Nation wants to know

The phrase “the nation wants to know” had an effect only when it was combined with Arnab Goswami’s magic (“Nation wants to know: Does Arnab Goswami stand a chance in trademark battle with the Times Group?”). It will be a damp squib when mouthed by someone else at TimesNow.

On the other hand, Goswami might need a new format and new game at Republic TV to recreate the huge following he had generated in his earlier role. – Som Shubhra De


The phrase, “nation wants to know” goes only with Arnab Goswami’s personality. It was indicative of him speaking from the bottom of his heart for us, the people people of the nation. It’s definitely his trade mark. We, as a nation, did not identify the phrase with Times Now but with Goswami. – Bina John Tharakan


The US should take care of race-related attacks on their own soil instead of talking about India. Do you want us to keep quiet when the missionaries from the West swarm our country and destroy our culture and the faith? The act of missionaries converting our people hurts us as much as this intolerance you talk about. If Hindus carry out conversions at a large scale in the US, will you guys accept it? You would also cry foul. – DS Rao


I feel Arnab Goswami is one of the best senior news reporters India has. I never ever used to watch TV news until he appeared on TimesNow.I’ve now lost interest in TimesNow. – Madhu

Water woes

The people of India and West Bengal need every drop of water they can get (“Why Mamata Banerjee refuses to share Teesta: The river has just 1/16th of water needed”). The Indian government needs to think of its people before sharing water with Bangladesh. With China building a huge dam on the Bramhaputra River, all of East India is going to have water problems. Bangladesh has plenty of water, they can build a desalination plant and provide water to the people. – Gaurang Bhatt

Criminal minds

This article gave me great insights into the “tandoor” murder case and why it is not a crime against society but one committed due to possiveness (“How the ‘tandoor murderer’ Sushil Sharma spends his days in Tihar Jail”). I am able to appreciate the thought and idea of an academic course structured by Sushi Sharma would want like-minded people to connect and implement this soon. – Kunal Mathur

Murky waters

The protest against the Naval Academy may be politically motivated (“Indian Naval Academy in Kerala is in choppy waters as residents claim it contaminated their wells”). Nevertheless, Keralites should know that the presence of e-coli in their open wells is their own doing. Many studies show that the leach pit toilets across Kerala are a reason for the high penetration of e-coli in their open wells. – Uday Shankar P

Going unnoticed

Please stop sensationalisation. I belong to Bikram, one the blocks that the writer covers in this article, and have seen at first hand the situation there (“In a Bihar district, an Anaj Bank has freed Dalit women from hunger and exploitation”). The author, Mohd Imran Khan, makes no mention of hunger deaths after the setting up of the Anaj Bank. That is insane. It’s good to discuss the benefits and success of the initiative but you cannot gloss over the problems.

Don’t make assumptions and write that will be popular just to make your article interesting – Mrigendra

Make in India

Why don’t the Indian government and entrepreneurs take the US visa curbs as an opportunity to boost local spending on IT and build a robust infrastructure (“H-1B visa changes: Nirmala Sitharaman hints at Centre retaliating to new US policy”)?

There is no doubt we make a huge chunk of money by providing services to the developed world but in the process, we have missed out on creating a research and development environment at home.

We have build a huge market in terms of engineering colleges but there is no check by the government or any authority to look at the quality of engineers we produce. This is not because Indians are not competent but the lack of good quality instructors in these so called engineering colleges. These colleges have just become money-making machines for owners.

Meanwhile, we are generating huge business for companies like Google, Facebook, Microsoft etc but there is no such giant being created in India.

Moreover, Indian IT employees are mostly considered cheap labour.

Governments have pushed private organisations to make technologies which best suite their economies. But we are just following the western world without looking into the implications. – Talwinder Singh

Religious rules

Who are we to challenge the procedures laid down in the Quran (“If Pakistan and 21 other countries have abolished triple talaq, why can’t India?”)? There should not be any debate whatsoever on the subject. We have become a laughing stock. We have no right to remove the reconciliation factor during the process of talaq as dictated in the Quran. The earlier we resolve this, the better it is. – Irshad Ahmed

Cow clashes

Around 10,500 years ago, cattle was domesticated from as few as 80 progenitors in southeast Turkey (“Beef ban dominates political discourse in Goa ahead of impending bye-elections”). The cow is not indigenous to India like the gaur or the buffalo, domesticated by the Indus Valley civilization. It was brought from the West Asia, probably by the Dravidians. All religions breed fanatics, since religion is a social construct for social cohesion and security against the uncertainties of nature and of what happens after death. – Taumaturgo Furtado

Living rivers

When we consider non-living entities as living ones, doesn’t it drastically change the way we define a living thing, especially a human being (“A court naming Ganga and Yamuna as legal entities could invite a river of problems”)? One thinks of a human being as someone who is able to think, reflect, take conscious and autonomous decisions; among other dispositions. When a river is given an equal status to of a living being, it raises philosophical questions about those who are catergorised as humans under the traditional definition. Are there no theoretical/legal differences between a human and a river? Or are the practical differences between the two of no significance?

What happens to the idea of consent when a non-vocal entity is given a legal right and is provided with a guardian? It is certainly not a new practice for humans. Historically, several groups of individuals are protected under someone’s guardianship. Minors and women of significant numbers still continue to be so. Does that mean a minor human being and river have similar capability to reason and make decisions? Are they both unable to provide their consent due to shared reasons?

One also has to take in the view of the guardian who may have certain personal interest in the minor, or here river. Humans have to necessarily depend on the river to sustain themselves and develop. Would the guardian of the river not allow humans to use the river for their personal requirements?

From providing water for drinking, bathing and farming to using it for industrial purposes, it has multiple uses and a ban will not be feasible. It would, then, come down to striking a balance between using and exploiting the resource, which will be the human guardian’s prerogative. It is quite possible that the balance might not be fair and could tilt in the favour of humans. –Varun Khimani

Biased views

I’ve come across your website many times and almost each time, I’ve been dissapointed. Under the the pretense of being a news website, you are painting an ideology you support. Almost none of your articles seem to be a mere news pieces. Each one has a similar ideology. I find it highly unethical on your part. If you really want to post your opinion, then disclose it accordingly. What you are doing right now is nothing short of a fraud. – Shubham Bhartiya

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Relying on the power of habits to solve India’s mammoth sanitation problem

Adopting three simple habits can help maximise the benefits of existing sanitation infrastructure.

India’s sanitation problem is well documented – the country was recently declared as having the highest number of people living without basic sanitation facilities. Sanitation encompasses all conditions relating to public health - especially sewage disposal and access to clean drinking water. Due to associated losses in productivity caused by sickness, increased healthcare costs and increased mortality, India recorded a loss of 5.2% of its GDP to poor sanitation in 2015. As tremendous as the economic losses are, the on-ground, human consequences of poor sanitation are grim - about one in 10 deaths, according to the World Bank.

Poor sanitation contributes to about 10% of the world’s disease burden and is linked to even those diseases that may not present any correlation at first. For example, while lack of nutrition is a direct cause of anaemia, poor sanitation can contribute to the problem by causing intestinal diseases which prevent people from absorbing nutrition from their food. In fact, a study found a correlation between improved sanitation and reduced prevalence of anaemia in 14 Indian states. Diarrhoeal diseases, the most well-known consequence of poor sanitation, are the third largest cause of child mortality in India. They are also linked to undernutrition and stunting in children - 38% of Indian children exhibit stunted growth. Improved sanitation can also help reduce prevalence of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Though not a cause of high mortality rate, NTDs impair physical and cognitive development, contribute to mother and child illness and death and affect overall productivity. NTDs caused by parasitic worms - such as hookworms, whipworms etc. - infect millions every year and spread through open defecation. Improving toilet access and access to clean drinking water can significantly boost disease control programmes for diarrhoea, NTDs and other correlated conditions.

Unfortunately, with about 732 million people who have no access to toilets, India currently accounts for more than half of the world population that defecates in the open. India also accounts for the largest rural population living without access to clean water. Only 16% of India’s rural population is currently served by piped water.

However, there is cause for optimism. In the three years of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, the country’s sanitation coverage has risen from 39% to 65% and eight states and Union Territories have been declared open defecation free. But lasting change cannot be ensured by the proliferation of sanitation infrastructure alone. Ensuring the usage of toilets is as important as building them, more so due to the cultural preference for open defecation in rural India.

According to the World Bank, hygiene promotion is essential to realise the potential of infrastructure investments in sanitation. Behavioural intervention is most successful when it targets few behaviours with the most potential for impact. An area of public health where behavioural training has made an impact is WASH - water, sanitation and hygiene - a key issue of UN Sustainable Development Goal 6. Compliance to WASH practices has the potential to reduce illness and death, poverty and improve overall socio-economic development. The UN has even marked observance days for each - World Water Day for water (22 March), World Toilet Day for sanitation (19 November) and Global Handwashing Day for hygiene (15 October).

At its simplest, the benefits of WASH can be availed through three simple habits that safeguard against disease - washing hands before eating, drinking clean water and using a clean toilet. Handwashing and use of toilets are some of the most important behavioural interventions that keep diarrhoeal diseases from spreading, while clean drinking water is essential to prevent water-borne diseases and adverse health effects of toxic contaminants. In India, Hindustan Unilever Limited launched the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, a WASH behaviour change programme, to complement the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Through its on-ground behaviour change model, SASB seeks to promote the three basic WASH habits to create long-lasting personal hygiene compliance among the populations it serves.

This touching film made as a part of SASB’s awareness campaign shows how lack of knowledge of basic hygiene practices means children miss out on developmental milestones due to preventable diseases.


SASB created the Swachhata curriculum, a textbook to encourage adoption of personal hygiene among school going children. It makes use of conceptual learning to teach primary school students about cleanliness, germs and clean habits in an engaging manner. Swachh Basti is an extensive urban outreach programme for sensitising urban slum residents about WASH habits through demos, skits and etc. in partnership with key local stakeholders such as doctors, anganwadi workers and support groups. In Ghatkopar, Mumbai, HUL built the first-of-its-kind Suvidha Centre - an urban water, hygiene and sanitation community centre. It provides toilets, handwashing and shower facilities, safe drinking water and state-of-the-art laundry operations at an affordable cost to about 1,500 residents of the area.

HUL’s factory workers also act as Swachhata Doots, or messengers of change who teach the three habits of WASH in their own villages. This mobile-led rural behaviour change communication model also provides a volunteering opportunity to those who are busy but wish to make a difference. A toolkit especially designed for this purpose helps volunteers approach, explain and teach people in their immediate vicinity - their drivers, cooks, domestic helps etc. - about the three simple habits for better hygiene. This helps cast the net of awareness wider as regular interaction is conducive to habit formation. To learn more about their volunteering programme, click here. To learn more about the Swachh Aadat Swachh Bharat initiative, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hindustan Unilever and not by the Scroll editorial team.