conservation model

Kaziranga activists jailed: Colleagues claim this is vendetta for their role in BBC film on poaching

Pranab Doley and Soneswar Narah had spoken about extra-judicial killings by wildlife-protection officials in the reserve.

Activists Pranab Doley and Soneswar Narah of the Jeepal Krishak Shramik Sangha – an unregistered group that claims to work for the rights of indigenous communities living in and around the Kaziranga National Park in Assam’s Golaghat district – have been in the custody of the state police since April 24. The police have accused the men of forcing their way into a government office and disrupting its work.

However, Doley and Narah’s colleagues from the Sangha say the two have been made to pay for exposing the alleged extra-judicial killing of civilians, branded as poachers, inside the wildlife reserve – which is home to two-thirds of the world’s population of the one-horned rhino. Doley also featured in a controversial BBC documentary on the same subject that aired in February, following which Indian authorities banned the media house from filming in India’s tiger reserves for the next five years.

The BBC connection

The documentary, Killing for Conservation, featured the BBC’s South Asia correspondent, Justin Rowlatt. It contended that at the heart of the park’s conservation success story was a strict shoot-at-sight policy, and described Kaziranga as “the park that shoots people to protect rhinos”.

“Its rangers have been given the kind of powers to shoot and kill normally only conferred on armed forces policing civil unrest,” it claimed.

A report by Rowlatt accompanying the documentary liberally quoted Doley, who said the high number of deaths in the park – 106 people have reportedly been shot dead by Kaziranga guards in the last 20 years – was a consequence of the “legal protection the park and its guards enjoy”.

Indian authorities took strong exception to the documentary. The Central government banned the BBC from filming in India’s tiger reserves for five years. The National Tiger Conservation Authority reportedly requested the Ministry of External Affairs not to renew Rowlatt’s visa. And Assam’s state government also mulled legal action against the BBC, reports said.

Close on the heels of the documentary, in the first week of March, the Jeepal Krishak Shramik Sangha held a press conference in Guwahati where Doley and Narah claimed the government was trying to cover up extra-judicial killings by threatening legal action against a journalist. Their allegations were widely reported in the local media.

Mantu Borah, secretary of the Sangha, told that the organisation was “compelled to believe” in the wake of recent events that Doley and Narah had been arrested because the government wanted to muffle their voices. “The sequence of events that led to the arrests was proof that it was vendetta against them,” he said.


A protest, and sudden arrests

On April 19, the Jeepal Krishak Shramik Sangha staged a protest. It was in response to an advertisement for recruitment to the 90 Assam Forest Protection Force, a specialised armed force supervised and controlled by the national park’s management, which had appeared in the state’s newspapers a few days ago. The protest took place in front of the office of the Bokakhat divisional forest officer, Rohini Ballave Saikia.

The Sangha contended that the 90 personnel to be hired should be drawn from communities living around the national park. It also demanded the immediate release of compensation for loss of life or property during the 2016 floods, a loan waiver for affected farmers, and jobs for the family members of those who had died as a result of animal attacks and the alleged excesses of the forest department. Finally, they demanded disclosure of clearance papers for the highlands (raised platforms) being constructed inside the core zone of the national park.

The protest on April 19, according to Borah, was called off when Saikia assured the organisation in writing that their demands would be considered. The officer reportedly invited the leaders of the Sangha to discuss the matter two days later.

On April 21, Assam Forest Minister Pramila Rani Brahma chaired a meeting with members of the Sangha at the Bokakhat divisional forest office. “All our demands, except the disclosing of clearance papers of the highland construction, were agreed to by the minister,” said Borah.

He said the divisional forest officer also gave written assurance that he would hand over the minutes of the meeting to the representatives of the protestors, which included Doley and Narah, on April 24.

On April 24, while waiting for the divisional forest officer at his office, Doley received a call informing him that five men from the forest community had been arrested. The men, Borah said, were accused of being poachers.

“Pranab [Doley] went to the police station to request the officers to let the accused meet their relatives,” he said. The police turned down his request and an altercation ensued. “In a matter of minutes, Pranab was dragged inside the lock-up too,” Borah added. “Narah too was arrested when he went to check on Pranab.”

The Jeepal Krishak Shramik Sangha claims to work for the indigenous communities living in the vicinity of the Kaziranga National Park. (Credit: Reuters)
The Jeepal Krishak Shramik Sangha claims to work for the indigenous communities living in the vicinity of the Kaziranga National Park. (Credit: Reuters)

Troublemakers, say police

According to the sub-divisional police officer of Bokakhat, Bitul Chetia, the police acted on a complaint filed by the office of the divisional forest officer on April 19. “Doley and Narah had tried barging inside a government office, disrupted its functioning, and threatened to burn down the office,” Chetia said.

A first information report was lodged against the two men under sections 147, 447, 353 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code that deal with rioting, criminal trespass, assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging his duty, and criminal intimidation.

Borah said the charges were fabricated and the demonstration on April 19 was peaceful.

“The case was filed on April 19 and the two were there in a meeting with the minister and the divisional forest officer at his office on April 21,” he said. “Why did they wait for the two to go to the police station voluntarily three days later to arrest them? What sense does that make?”

Chetia explained that the police were waiting for an opportune moment to arrest the two. “They were leading a protest on April 21,” he said. “In view of keeping public order, we did not arrest [them] that day as we had an intelligence input that the situation could turn bad.”

Terming Doley and Narah troublemakers, the police officer added, “They want instant resolution to all their problems. The BBC documentary was also their handiwork. They misled the journalist and instigated the local people to give false information.”

Chetia, however, denied the arrest had anything to do with the duo’s participation in the documentary.

Refuting Chetia’s charge of the Jeepal Krishak Shramik Sangha manipulating the documentary, Borah said, “We just acted as guides, shared evidence, and directed them to the right people.”

On the other hand, Saikia said the forest department’s complaint had nothing to do with the BBC documentary. “They [Doley and Narah] tried forcefully to enter a beat office and disrupt its functioning,” he added.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Swara Bhasker: Sharp objects has to be on the radar of every woman who is tired of being “nice”

The actress weighs in on what she loves about the show.

This article has been written by award-winning actor Swara Bhasker.

All women growing up in India, South Asia, or anywhere in the world frankly; will remember in some form or the other that gentle girlhood admonishing, “Nice girls don’t do that.” I kept recalling that gently reasoned reproach as I watched Sharp Objects (you can catch it on Hotstar Premium). Adapted from the author of Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn’s debut novel Sharp Objects has been directed by Jean-Marc Vallée, who has my heart since he gave us Big Little Lies. It stars the multiple-Oscar nominee Amy Adams, who delivers a searing performance as Camille Preaker; and Patricia Clarkson, who is magnetic as the dominating and dark Adora Crellin. As an actress myself, it felt great to watch a show driven by its female performers.

The series is woven around a troubled, alcohol-dependent, self-harming, female journalist Camille (single and in her thirties incidentally) who returns to the small town of her birth and childhood, Wind Gap, Missouri, to report on two similarly gruesome murders of teenage girls. While the series is a murder mystery, it equally delves into the psychology, not just of the principal characters, but also of the town, and thus a culture as a whole.

There is a lot that impresses in Sharp Objects — the manner in which the storytelling gently unwraps a plot that is dark, disturbing and shocking, the stellar and crafty control that Jean-Marc Vallée exercises on his narrative, the cinematography that is fluid and still manages to suggest that something sinister lurks within Wind Gap, the editing which keeps this narrative languid yet sharp and consistently evokes a haunting sensation.

Sharp Objects is also liberating (apart from its positive performance on Bechdel parameters) as content — for female actors and for audiences in giving us female centric and female driven shows that do not bear the burden of providing either role-models or even uplifting messages. 

Instead, it presents a world where women are dangerous and dysfunctional but very real — a world where women are neither pure victims, nor pure aggressors. A world where they occupy the grey areas, complex and contradictory as agents in a power play, in which they control some reigns too.

But to me personally, and perhaps to many young women viewers across the world, what makes Sharp Objects particularly impactful, perhaps almost poignant, is the manner in which it unravels the whole idea, the culture, the entire psychology of that childhood admonishment “Nice girls don’t do that.” Sharp Objects explores the sinister and dark possibilities of what the corollary of that thinking could be.

“Nice girls don’t do that.”

“Who does?”

“Bad girls.”

“So I’m a bad girl.”

“You shouldn’t be a bad girl.”

“Why not?”

“Bad girls get in trouble.”

“What trouble? What happens to bad girls?”

“Bad things.”

“What bad things?”

“Very bad things.”

“How bad?”


“Like what?”


A point the show makes early on is that both the victims of the introductory brutal murders were not your typically nice girly-girls. Camille, the traumatised protagonist carrying a burden from her past was herself not a nice girl. Amma, her deceptive half-sister manipulates the nice girl act to defy her controlling mother. But perhaps the most incisive critique on the whole ‘Be a nice girl’ culture, in fact the whole ‘nice’ culture — nice folks, nice manners, nice homes, nice towns — comes in the form of Adora’s character and the manner in which beneath the whole veneer of nice, a whole town is complicit in damning secrets and not-so-nice acts. At one point early on in the show, Adora tells her firstborn Camille, with whom she has a strained relationship (to put it mildly), “I just want things to be nice with us but maybe I don’t know how..” Interestingly it is this very notion of ‘nice’ that becomes the most oppressive and deceptive experience of young Camille, and later Amma’s growing years.

This ‘Culture of Nice’ is in fact the pervasive ‘Culture of Silence’ that women all over the world, particularly in India, are all too familiar with. 

It takes different forms, but always towards the same goal — to silence the not-so-nice details of what the experiences; sometimes intimate experiences of women might be. This Culture of Silence is propagated from the child’s earliest experience of being parented by society in general. Amongst the values that girls receive in our early years — apart from those of being obedient, dutiful, respectful, homely — we also receive the twin headed Chimera in the form of shame and guilt.

“Have some shame!”

“Oh for shame!”




“Do not bring shame upon…”

Different phrases in different languages, but always with the same implication. Shameful things happen to girls who are not nice and that brings ‘shame’ on the family or everyone associated with the girl. And nice folks do not talk about these things. Nice folks go on as if nothing has happened.

It is this culture of silence that women across the world today, are calling out in many different ways. Whether it is the #MeToo movement or a show like Sharp Objects; or on a lighter and happier note, even a film like Veere Di Wedding punctures this culture of silence, quite simply by refusing to be silenced and saying the not-nice things, or depicting the so called ‘unspeakable’ things that could happen to girls. By talking about the unspeakable, you rob it of the power to shame you; you disallow the ‘Culture of Nice’ to erase your experience. You stand up for yourself and you build your own identity.

And this to me is the most liberating aspect of being an actor, and even just a girl at a time when shows like Sharp Objects and Big Little Lies (another great show on Hotstar Premium), and films like Veere Di Wedding and Anaarkali Of Aarah are being made.

The next time I hear someone say, “Nice girls don’t do that!”, I know what I’m going to say — I don’t give a shit about nice. I’m just a girl! And that’s okay!

Swara is a an award winning actor of the Hindi film industry. Her last few films, including Veere Di Wedding, Anaarkali of Aaraah and Nil Battey Sannata have earned her both critical and commercial success. Swara is an occasional writer of articles and opinion pieces. The occasions are frequent :).

Watch the trailer of Sharp Objects here:


This article was published by the Scroll marketing team with Swara Bhasker on behalf of Hotstar Premium and not by the Scroll editorial team.