Tax Talk

Complex web: Why too many tax slabs could defeat the very idea of the Goods and Services Tax

The GST regime could end up with 10 effective tax rates.

Going to the movies can be quite taxing now: buying a ticket for less than Rs 100 will attract tax at 18% while a ticket for over Rs 100 will be taxed at 28%, according to the latest Goods and Services Tax guidelines decided on Sunday. This is symptomatic of how India’s most sweeping tax reform since Independence is turning out to be – variable, complicated and, most of all, unpredictable.

GST is an attempt to turn India into a common market by folding all indirect taxes, from octroi to service tax, into one rate that would be consistent nation-wide. But the promise of “one nation one tax”, which is how the government has advertised it, has given way to various conditions, guidelines and complexities that make the final product much more confusing than originally envisioned.

The GST is set to be rolled out on July 1, nearly 16 years after being put in motion. But the regime will be substantially different than what most people would have imagined. For one, there are six tax rates ranging from no tax to 40% within which the central government is trying to fit all commodities. Although it still means similar products will be taxed at the same rate all over the country, this is much more complex than a single rate of 15%-18%, as suggested by reports last year.

Worryingly, GST rates are being changed by the GST council on the basis of industry representations to the fitment committee. This committee is tasked with fitting all goods and services into relevant tax brackets based on the rates and additional duties, such as excise, that they attracted earlier. In principle, this sounds fairly intuitive as one might expect commodities to be taxed at more or less the same rates as before.

In reality, however, the GST has turned out to be a complex web of conditions instead of a clean tax regime like that of New Zealand, where a flat rate of 15% is applied to all goods and services. In India, the effective number of rates will rise to 10 (plus zero tax), if one includes the addition cesses that will be levied for certain commodities, according to a recent column by Devangshu Datta for Business Standard.

“In practice, it [GST] will increase the pain of compliance, if not the cost, a lot. It also has clauses that offer scope to create a single market for corruption. Along the way, it will generate a huge amount of make-work,” Dutta wrote.

The rates finalised by the GST council are zero tax, 5%, 12%, 18% and 28%. The highest tax slab is for luxury and so-called demerit items which will also attract additional cess.

Six other cesses continue to remain in place even though the government had claimed the GST will subsume all cesses and taxes. These are:

  • Education cess on imported goods
  • Secondary and higher education cess on imported goods
  • Cess on crude petroleum oil
  • Road cess on motor spirit and diesel oil  
  • Special additional duty of excise on motor spirit
  • National Calamity Contingent Duty on tobacco, products thereof and crude petroleum oil  

Is it any better?

This complexity is precisely why the industry has been both welcoming of and a bit worried about the GST. There is still no certainty on the taxation that will follow and heavy penalties await those who miss deadlines for filing applicable forms. This is why some of them are now reaching out to bureaucrats for help.

The Chamber of Associations of Maharashtra Industry and Trade, an umbrella body for industry associations in Maharashtra, has met with the state’s finance minister and chief commissioner of sales tax to lobby for lowering of tax rates on certain commodities and also for simplification of tax slabs.

“The concept is welcome but the law needs a lot of work to make it viable for industries,” said Mitesh Modi, the chamber’s joint general secretary. He said many commodities used in the manufacture of equipment that they consider essential have been “unfairly” put under the 28% tax slab.

“Nowhere in the world you have so many tiers to the GST structure,” Modi said. “The industry was expecting merely two slabs but now we have got so many which will only increase compliance burden.”

This sentiment was echoed by ClearTax founder Archit Gupta. ClearTax is aiming to provide GST services through its online tax filing platform for businesses but Gupta said the industry is nowhere near prepared for a July 1 rollout.

“We have not seen too many people signing up for GST migration just yet,” Gupta said. “There is a lot of gap in transition and some industries are downright unaware how to go about it. Multiple slab rates do add to the complication but the government claims that it kept inflation in mind while deciding rates.”

Radhika Pandey, an economist at the National Institute for Public Finance and Policy, argued that multiple slab structures could be necessary owing to different consumption patterns and demand, but uniformity in pricing is important.

Pandey said the tax rates should be based on economics and not industry lobbying. She warned that the complexity of the GST could hurt small enterprises. “Another potential challenge could be the lack of preparedness on the part of small and medium enterprises. They may not fully understand the system in the initial phases,” Pandey said.

Still, there might be some benefit for businesses in moving to the GST as the government claims that the weighted average tax burden will come down on the average basket of commodities. Additionally, the GST subsumes a host of levies and taxes, which will now be available as input credit for manufacturing firms that currently pay tax on both the inputs as well as the final product.

“India’s current tax codes are so horribly complex that even this khichdi is an improvement,” Datta summed it up in his column. “If it does stop tax cascades, and if refunds and rebates come without undue delays, it would result in lower tax incidence for many organisations.”

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.


In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.


Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.


The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.


The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.