Letters to the editor

Readers’ comments: ‘Step-motherly treatment of West Bengal has fuelled Gorkhaland demand’

A selection of readers’ opinions.

Gorkhaland demand

Gorkhas have been living in North East India since time immemorial (“‘Bengal is our coffin’: In Darjeeling, food stocks run low but support for Gorkhaland is undimmed”). They have fought and died for the country – be it during the World Wars, the 1962 Sino-Indian war or the 1971 war with Pakistan.

Gorkhas are simple, peaceful and co-operative people who play politics and stay in harmony. But the step-motherly treatment of the West Bengal government towards them has given rise to the Gorkhaland demand. The hills are deprived of growth and people have to go elsewhere for jobs. The tea gardens are in a shambles, so much more can be done to promote tourism, the municipality is non-functional. There has been no infrastructural development.

So, I think it would be fair to give Gorkhas their separate land. Nobody should have a problem with the creation of the Gorkhaland state. – Aneel Thapa

Body politics

I do not agree with the writer’s opinion about Kashmir (“I was a human shield: In Kashmir, India is surrendering its humanity”). Why is he silent on the torture and rape of Kashmiri Hindus at the hands of militants? They were chased out of Kashmir.

Are bomb blasts and murders by militants ethical? What about the acts of stone-pelters? If someone is not happy being in a particular country for whatever reason, they should find a new place to stay. – Hemantkumar Kulkarni


The Army you talk about is the same that has saved lakhs of Kashmiris during floods and other natural calamities. May be we should have allowed Pakistan to occupy Srinagar in 1947. Then you and your ilk would have realised what it means to be trampled by Islamabad. Balochis and Sindhis are suffering 70 years after Independence in Pakistan and so are the people of Pakistan occupied Kashmir. – Mahesh Nayak


It’s not entirely true. Many of us are aware of what happened in Kashmir. It’s gut-wrenching and breaks our heart. – Shashank Singh

Yoga day

The writer seems to have taken a stab at a topic of which he clearly has no understanding (“Yes, we should celebrate yoga – but not for the reason Modi and his admirers want us to”). It randomly quotes a few writers and reaches conclusions. I would encourage the writer to practice and see the difference himself. Patanjali never prescribed suppression of mind, rather it spoke about how to train the mind to be under one’s control. I am surprised at the editor’s choice to publish such a poor piece of writing. – Srikanth


I feel sickened by your views in this article. There is so much negativity in it that it have the word “yoga” in the article makes no sense. You leave no opportunity to criticise the BJP. You think that since you’re the English media, your views will resonate with the English-speaking Indian population, but that is not the case. Understand the way in which national political opinion is flowing to stay relevant, else you won’t last long. – Mayank

Presidential race

This is a biased article (“Not a masterstroke: BJP picked Kalam for president after 2002 riots, Kovind after attacks on Dalits”). Why are all the government’s good initiatives given a casteist tinge? Atrocities are a result of the acts of uncivilised and immature citizens. We need to educate those people instead of blaming the government for each and every thing. That is the the responsibility of press. – Iyer Sivaramakrishnan

Left out

This is regarding the piece titled “Watch: Sign language interpreters are bringing music to the hearing-impaired.” The first line of this reads: What if people with impaired hearing, could hear and experience music as we know it? Who is the “we” that you are referring to? Are you assuming that everyone in your reading audience has perfect hearing?

I am deaf and have been reading newspapers and magazines for some 50 years. I am tired of the assumption that deaf and hard-of-hearing people could not possibly be reading these things. Please stop with the “us” vs “them” outlook. – Tom Willard

Bitter pill

The Karnataka private medical establishment act is a draconian law that apparently vilifies all private doctors (“In Karnataka, revamp of medical regulations in the name of citizens is only hurting their interests”). Providing quality healthcare to people is the duty of the government and cannot be thrust upon the private sector. I wonder why people expect doctors to do charity even though we run hospital or clinics on shoe-string budges.,

If there is no profitability in it, a business cannot sustain itself. Becoming a doctor is not easy, we put in more than 15 years in studying without earning any income, and yet people expect charity from private doctors.

Are we not living in a democratic country? This suggests that we are living in a communist country. If people want quality healthcare from the private sector, they should understand that it comes at a price, as in any other business. Articles like this instigate violence against doctors.

People always have the choice of going to government hospitals. – Rathan Shetty

Wrong note

The author either forgets or does not know that dhrupad is a verse form (“What German composer Bach has in common with the Indian dhrupad genre”). The suffix “pad” says so. As Abul Fazl describes it in Ain e Akbari, it is a verse form consisting of four rhyming lines, each in free metre. Nothing more or less.
Jyoti Pande

Lost years

It came as such a relief that Asrar Jamayee’s pension has been restored and he will get what’s due to him (“Delhi government orders pension of Urdu poet ‘incorrectly declared dead’ to be restored”). The amount, however, is meagre. – Arpita Ghosh


What about his retroactive pension? What about all those years he was denied his rightful income? That must be restored too. – Najeeb Khan

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Virat Kohli and Ola come together to improve Delhi's air quality

The onus of curbing air-pollution is on citizens as well

A recent study by The Lancet Journal revealed that outdoor pollution was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. As a thick smog hangs low over Delhi, leaving its residents gasping for air, the pressure is on the government to implement SOS measures to curb the issue as well as introduce long-term measures to improve the air quality of the state. Other major cities like Mumbai, Pune and Kolkata should also acknowledge the gravitas of the situation.

The urgency of the air-pollution crisis in the country’s capital is being reflected on social media as well. A recent tweet by Virat Kohli, Captain of the Indian Cricket Team, urged his fans to do their bit in helping the city fight pollution. Along with the tweet, Kohli shared a video in which he emphasized that curbing pollution is everyone’s responsibility. Apart from advocating collective effort, Virat Kohli’s tweet also urged people to use buses, metros and Ola share to help reduce the number of vehicles on the road.

In the spirit of sharing the responsibility, ride sharing app Ola responded with the following tweet.

To demonstrate its commitment to fight the problem of vehicular pollution and congestion, Ola is launching #ShareWednesdays : For every ​new user who switches to #OlaShare in Delhi, their ride will be free. The offer by Ola that encourages people to share resources serves as an example of mobility solutions that can reduce the damage done by vehicular pollution. This is the fourth leg of Ola’s year-long campaign, #FarakPadtaHai, to raise awareness for congestion and pollution issues and encourage the uptake of shared mobility.

In 2016, WHO disclosed 10 Indian cities that made it on the list of worlds’ most polluted. The situation necessitates us to draw from experiences and best practices around the world to keep a check on air-pollution. For instance, a system of congestion fees which drivers have to pay when entering central urban areas was introduced in Singapore, Oslo and London and has been effective in reducing vehicular-pollution. The concept of “high occupancy vehicle” or car-pool lane, implemented extensively across the US, functions on the principle of moving more people in fewer cars, thereby reducing congestion. The use of public transport to reduce air-pollution is another widely accepted solution resulting in fewer vehicles on the road. Many communities across the world are embracing a culture of sustainable transportation by investing in bike lanes and maintenance of public transport. Even large corporations are doing their bit to reduce vehicular pollution. For instance, as a participant of the Voluntary Traffic Demand Management project in Beijing, Lenovo encourages its employees to adopt green commuting like biking, carpooling or even working from home. 18 companies in Sao Paulo executed a pilot program aimed at reducing congestion by helping people explore options such as staggering their hours, telecommuting or carpooling. After the pilot, drive-alone rates dropped from 45-51% to 27-35%.

It’s the government’s responsibility to ensure that the growth of a country doesn’t compromise the natural environment that sustains it, however, a substantial amount of responsibility also lies on each citizen to lead an environment-friendly lifestyle. Simple lifestyle changes such as being cautious about usage of electricity, using public transport, or choosing locally sourced food can help reduce your carbon footprint, the collective impact of which is great for the environment.

Ola is committed to reducing the impact of vehicular pollution on the environment by enabling and encouraging shared rides and greener mobility. They have also created flat fare zones across Delhi-NCR on Ola Share to make more environment friendly shared rides also more pocket-friendly. To ensure a larger impact, the company also took up initiatives with City Traffic Police departments, colleges, corporate parks and metro rail stations.

Join the fight against air-pollution by using the hashtag #FarakPadtaHai and download Ola to share your next ride.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Ola and not by the Scroll editorial team.