Pakistani politics

Fontgate: Could a Microsoft typeface bring down Nawaz Sharif in Pakistan?

The prime minister’s daughter Maryam Nawaz is accused of falsifying documents, submitted for the Panama Papers enquiry, using the Calibri font.

A political scandal that has gripped Pakistan for over a year and threatens to bring down Nawaz Sharif’s government has come to be pivoted on an unassuming typeface.

Calibri, Microsoft’s default font for its WordPad and PowerPoint programmes, became a buzzword in the country this week after a Joint Investigation Team found that the prime minister’s daughter Maryam Nawaz had falsified documents. Apparently, the documents submitted to the team dated to 2006, but were written in Calibri, a font that was not commercially available before January 31, 2007.

The report marks the latest twist in the long-running saga of corruption involving the Sharifs. Questions first arose over the financial affairs of the family after the Panama Papers, leaked in 2016, revealed that three of the prime minister’s children owned, through an offshore company, properties in London that were not declared in their assets. Opposition groups led by Imran Khan’s Tehreek-e-Insaf have accused the Sharifs of failing to explain where they got the money to buy the assets from.

In April, Nawaz Sharif narrowly survived an inconclusive ruling in the case by the Supreme Court, which found there was not enough evidence of corruption to remove him from office. Instead it ordered further investigation to determine the money trail. The resulting probe now threatens to unseat him, and Calibri sits at the heart of it.

Fontgate, as it has come to be dubbed, quickly trended on Twitter, with users eager to revel in the misfortunes of a political dynasty that is looked upon unsympathetically even at the best of times.

Some saw it as Pakistan’s ‘covfefe’ moment:

Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Frederik Obermaier declared Fontgate the favourite part of the investigation team’s report.

Naturally, plenty of memes were involved.

Puns, too.

Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, made an appearance as well.

Away from the jokes, debate raged about whether the Joint Investigation Team’s claims were correct. Many of the prime minister’s supporters pointed out that the font had been around from earlier than suggested. According to Microsoft’s website, an initial version of the font was available for download in 2005 and beta versions are likely to have been around even earlier. The contention over Calibri’s exact origins spiraled so out of control that on Wednesday, Wikipedia temporarily suspended public editing to its Calibri article until July 18 because of a slew of edit requests. The previous day, there had been over 30 revisions to the article.

Even Nawaz Sharif’s lawyer Zafarullah Khan was compelled to address the controversy in a press conference. “Please Google and see that [the font] was released in August 2004,” he said. Pakistan’s leading English newspaper Dawn took him up on the challenge and went further by contacting Lucas de Groot, the designer recognised as the font’s creator. A representative of his company, LucasFonts, admitted that Calibri had been designed in 2004 but said, “Early Windows betas are intended for programmers and technology freaks to see what works and what doesn’t. As the file size of such operating systems is huge, it would have been a serious effort to get.”

De Groot himself wrote separately to the newspaper, questioning “why would anyone use a completely unknown font for an official document in 2006?”

The implausibility of his working theory was the least of Khan’s worries, however. In an audacious attempt to defend his client, the lawyer drew parallels between Sharif and Jesus Chris, earning the ire of the civil society group Christian Action Committee, which demanded that criminal proceedings be launched against him for blasphemy unless he apologises.

As for the prime minister, he may need much more than just apologies for his exoneration.

Usman Ahmad is a British writer and photographer currently based in Pakistan.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.

Play

In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.

Play

Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.

Play

The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.

Play

The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.