attacks on journalists

‘Whoever protests, a sword dangles over their heads’: Voices from Bengaluru’s #IamGauri protest

Thousands made their way to Bengaluru’s Central College ground to protest the death of the reputed journalist, exactly one week ago.

Giriyappa, a retired lecturer, sat amid thousands of other protesters toting #IAmGauri signs and headbands at Bengaluru’s Central College Grounds on Tuesday, exactly a week after reputed journalist Gauri Lankesh was gunned down at her house. “I’ve been sitting here listening to all the speeches,” said Giriyappa. “And the one thing that’s running through my mind is that maybe I made a mistake by voting for Modi. He made so many promises and has not carried out a single one. Instead, such hate is spreading everywhere. So many of us thought he would live up to his promises.”

Lankesh died on September 5, after at least two unknown assailants shot four bullets at her as she was entering her house in Bengaluru’s Rajarajeswari Nagar. Known as a firebrand journalist who was strident about her opposition to right-wing politics, Lankesh’s death sparked protests around the country, with many connecting her killing to that of other renowned rationalists like MM Kalburgi, Govind Pansare and Narendra Dabholkar.

On Tuesday, Gauri Hatye Virodhi Vedike, a collective of civil society organisations in Bengaluru that came together to protest Lankesh’s death, organised a national rally that brought together a diverse set of speakers and supporters. On stage at the massive rally in the centre of Bengaluru were activists, writers, poets, journalists, musicians, religious leaders, politicians and even one film star.

“Gauri Lankesh represented the voice of dissent,” said Chetan, an actor in the Kannada film industry. “The voice against the culture of hatred being propagated in Karnataka. She did not bow down to the threats by the cowardly lot. She stood strong. They were scared of her bravery and hence, they killed her.”

Sitting in the massive tent assembled for the occasion was Ophelia Fernandes, a middle-aged woman, who knew Lankesh through her newspaper. “I used to read Gauri Lankesh Patrike and I felt that all that I used to think – whether it was about caste atrocities or communal violence – they were all so brilliantly voiced by Gauri in her publication,” Fernandes said. “Today, at this rally, I feel that something similar is happening. All that I felt after her death is gaining a voice here.”

Many of the speakers on the stage directed their anger in the aftermath of Lankesh’s death at the right wing, whether it was the Bharatiya Janata Party or the broader Hindu nationalist ecosystem, which could barely contain its glee after the journalist’s death. Slogans at the rally called out the Rashtiriya Swayamsevak Sangh for furthering what protesters called a “fascist agenda” and for celebrating her death.

But the stage was not simply filled with left-wing activists railing against Hindu nationalists. Right up front were four men clad in saffron robes, all of whom have been part of the agitation for Lingayats to be declared a religion, distinct from Hinduism. “Whoever walks down the path of protest, a sword always dangles over their head... It is not just the writers and activists who have been threatened,” said Shivamurthy Murugha Sharanaru. “I too have received threats. They have come after religious leaders too.”

Nijagunanda Swami, a Lingayat leader, also explained that Lankesh was familiar with their struggle. “The media reported that Gauri was connected to Hindu priests,” said Nijagunananda Swami. “Let it be known that our entire fight is about getting away from the folds of Hinduism.

Fernandes said she was pleasantly surprised by how “these priests clad in saffron were so progressive in their thoughts”, something she was not expecting to encounter at the protest.

“Such a diverse panel of speakers is the ideal answer we can give to those who like to communicate by using bullets,” said another man in the audience, who wanted to only be identified as Gauri. “It is abominable that a woman and a journalist was murdered like this. Come, argue, debate! Why kill? Such protests must intensify. This is the only reasonable answer to those committing acts of violence.”

Others too were impressed by the religious leaders’ comments.

“That speech by Nijagunananda swami particularly struck a chord with me,” said Jyothi, the state president of National Federation Women’s Institute. “He asked if Gauri will get justice in a land where Draupadi was stripped and I think that’s a very relevant question. It is that culture of misogyny and regressiveness that is gaining more ground today. I believe that all these murders are committed against the backdrop of such a culture. This is a culture that likes blood. We have to oppose this.”

Another Lingayat leader even brought up the question of whether Lankesh will get justice, especially since the Kalburgi case from 2015 is yet to be resolved. “The investigation of Gauri’s murder must not go the Kalburgi route,” said Nidumamunidi Swami. “There is no point in limiting the investigation to the contract killers alone. It should extend to those who have celebrated these deaths too.”

The organisers released a special edition of Gauri Lankesh Patrike, the newspaper that Lankesh ran, including anecdotes and photos of her as well as comments from people in the aftermath of her death. Speaking early on in the rally, Lankesh’s mother Indra was unable to contain her tears, but did manage to say to thank “all the Gauris gathered here.”

Reputed journalist P Sainath chose a sombre note for his address.

“The killings are not over. There will be more,” Sainath said. “There has rarely been a period of such constructed, deliberate terror and hatred. We are up against the largest machine of hate. There will be incredible provocation in coming days, but you should not fall for those traps of hatred.”

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.