Assembly elections

Why did the Election Commission announce polling dates for only Himachal and not Gujarat?

The Congress alleged that the BJP put pressure on the commission to delay its announcement, ahead of Modi’s rally in Gujarat on October 16.

The Election Commission was supposed to announce poll dates for both Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh on Thursday. Most of the media reported that dates of elections for both state assemblies would be declared at a press conference by the Election Commission at 4 pm. As it tweeted out a live stream to this press conference, the Press Information Bureau even said “Presser by the #ElectionCommission to announce schedule for Assembly Elections in Gujarat and Himachal.” Yet in the event, Chief Election Commissioner only gave a date for Himachal Pradesh, saying Gujarat’s elections will be notified soon.

Elections to Himachal Pradesh will take place on November 9, with counting of votes to take place nearly 40 days later on December 18. The Commission did not announce the dates of the Gujarat Assembly polls, saying only that they will take place before December 18, so that results from Himachal do not affect voters in Gujarat.

“Gujarat poll schedules are not announced right now due to the existing rules on time limit [46 days] for holding elections,” said Chief Election Commissioner Achal Kumar Joti. “But it will take place before December 18, to ensure that Himachal Pradesh election results do not impact the Gujarat elections.”

Gujarat delayed

Elections for these two states, and indeed any states that are going to the polls within a few months of each other, are usually announced at the same time as per the Election Commission’s convention. In 2012, for example, the Election Commission announced dates for both the states on October 4.

The Commission’s announcement of poll dates is significant because it means the Model Code of Conduct, a set of rules for how parties and governments can behave in the run-up to an election, comes into effect immediately. The declaration of Himachal’s dates means the model code is now in force in that Congress-ruled state. In Bharatiya Janata Party-run Gujarat, however, parties have the benefit on knowing broadly when elections will happen – before December 18 – without having the restrictions of the model code.

The Congress immediately attacked the decision, saying that the BJP had put pressure on the Commission, so that Prime Minister Narendra Modi can make more announcements about government largesse for the people of Gujarat, at his rally on October 16.

Elections are expected to be conducted within 45 days of their announcement – the reason cited by the Commission for its delay – although they haven’t always stuck to this time period. The 2012 Gujarat polls, for example, were announced on Oct 4 but only took place between December 13 and December 17, more than 60 days later.

A former Chief Election Commissioner, who refused to be named, told the Wire that this delay in announcing the Gujarat poll dates gives Modi time to announce sops and packages for the state. “By deferring the announcement of the Gujarat elections, they have killed the prestige of the Election Commission,” this person said.

Nervous BJP

Concerned about a mood of anti-incumbency as well as anger regarding economic measures in the state, the BJP-run Gujarat government has spent the last few weeks announcing measures that it hopes will improve the BJP’s fortunes.

The Centre announced changes to the Goods and Services Tax earlier this month that many said were directly aimed at businesses in Gujarat, Modi visted on his birthday to inaugurate a slew of projects and Chief Minister Vijay Rupani on Wednesday said the state would set up 16 new industrial estates with the aim of creating one lakh new jobs. As to illustrate how directly this was connected to the elections, the government listed these estates by the name of their respective Assembly constituencies rather than their districts. Rupani said this was saying “because it is otherwise difficult to gauge the location of the proposed GIDC just by their names”.

Despite this, analysts have suggested the BJP might find the going tough for the first time in decades. The party has been in control of the state for 22 years now. “The BJP has a fight on its hands,” wrote Swarajya’s R Jagannathan citing a pro-BJP psephologist who also said the party will face a tough fight. “And if it hopes to keep its winning narrative alive until 2019, it has to win Gujarat with a clear majority. Right now, it can’t be certain of that.”

Modi is now slated to visit the state for yet another rally on October 16, just ahead of Diwali. The Congress has alleged that the EC’s delay in announcing election dates was done so that he can promise even more sops to Gujarat’s voters at this rally. If Modi does indeed make a grand announcement on Monday, it will at the very least keep those tongues wagging.

We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Behind the garb of wealth and success, white collar criminals are hiding in plain sight

Understanding the forces that motivate leaders to become fraudsters.

Most con artists are very easy to like; the ones that belong to the corporate society, even more so. The Jordan Belforts of the world are confident, sharp and can smooth-talk their way into convincing people to bend at their will. For years, Harshad Mehta, a practiced con-artist, employed all-of-the-above to earn the sobriquet “big bull” on Dalaal Street. In 1992, the stockbroker used the pump and dump technique, explained later, to falsely inflate the Sensex from 1,194 points to 4,467. It was only after the scam that journalist Sucheta Dalal, acting on a tip-off, broke the story exposing how he fraudulently dipped into the banking system to finance a boom that manipulated the stock market.

Play

In her book ‘The confidence game’, Maria Konnikova observes that con artists are expert storytellers - “When a story is plausible, we often assume it’s true.” Harshad Mehta’s story was an endearing rags-to-riches tale in which an insurance agent turned stockbroker flourished based on his skill and knowledge of the market. For years, he gave hope to marketmen that they too could one day live in a 15,000 sq.ft. posh apartment with a swimming pool in upmarket Worli.

One such marketman was Ketan Parekh who took over Dalaal Street after the arrest of Harshad Mehta. Ketan Parekh kept a low profile and broke character only to celebrate milestones such as reaching Rs. 100 crore in net worth, for which he threw a lavish bash with a star-studded guest-list to show off his wealth and connections. Ketan Parekh, a trainee in Harshad Mehta’s company, used the same infamous pump-and-dump scheme to make his riches. In that, he first used false bank documents to buy high stakes in shares that would inflate the stock prices of certain companies. The rise in stock prices lured in other institutional investors, further increasing the price of the stock. Once the price was high, Ketan dumped these stocks making huge profits and causing the stock market to take a tumble since it was propped up on misleading share prices. Ketan Parekh was later implicated in the 2001 securities scam and is serving a 14-years SEBI ban. The tactics employed by Harshad Mehta and Ketan Parekh were similar, in that they found a loophole in the system and took advantage of it to accumulate an obscene amount of wealth.

Play

Call it greed, addiction or smarts, the 1992 and 2001 Securities Scams, for the first time, revealed the magnitude of white collar crimes in India. To fill the gaps exposed through these scams, the Securities Laws Act 1995 widened SEBI’s jurisdiction and allowed it to regulate depositories, FIIs, venture capital funds and credit-rating agencies. SEBI further received greater autonomy to penalise capital market violations with a fine of Rs 10 lakhs.

Despite an empowered regulatory body, the next white-collar crime struck India’s capital market with a massive blow. In a confession letter, Ramalinga Raju, ex-chairman of Satyam Computers convicted of criminal conspiracy and financial fraud, disclosed that Satyam’s balance sheets were cooked up to show an excess of revenues amounting to Rs. 7,000 crore. This accounting fraud allowed the chairman to keep the share prices of the company high. The deception, once revealed to unsuspecting board members and shareholders, made the company’s stock prices crash, with the investors losing as much as Rs. 14,000 crores. The crash of India’s fourth largest software services company is often likened to the bankruptcy of Enron - both companies achieved dizzying heights but collapsed to the ground taking their shareholders with them. Ramalinga Raju wrote in his letter “it was like riding a tiger, not knowing how to get off without being eaten”, implying that even after the realisation of consequences of the crime, it was impossible for him to rectify it.

It is theorised that white-collar crimes like these are highly rationalised. The motivation for the crime can be linked to the strain theory developed by Robert K Merton who stated that society puts pressure on individuals to achieve socially accepted goals (the importance of money, social status etc.). Not having the means to achieve those goals leads individuals to commit crimes.

Take the case of the executive who spent nine years in McKinsey as managing director and thereafter on the corporate and non-profit boards of Goldman Sachs, Procter & Gamble, American Airlines, and Harvard Business School. Rajat Gupta was a figure of success. Furthermore, his commitment to philanthropy added an additional layer of credibility to his image. He created the American India Foundation which brought in millions of dollars in philanthropic contributions from NRIs to development programs across the country. Rajat Gupta’s descent started during the investigation on Raj Rajaratnam, a Sri-Lankan hedge fund manager accused of insider trading. Convicted for leaking confidential information about Warren Buffet’s sizeable investment plans for Goldman Sachs to Raj Rajaratnam, Rajat Gupta was found guilty of conspiracy and three counts of securities fraud. Safe to say, Mr. Gupta’s philanthropic work did not sway the jury.

Play

The people discussed above have one thing in common - each one of them was well respected and celebrated for their industry prowess and social standing, but got sucked down a path of non-violent crime. The question remains - Why are individuals at successful positions willing to risk it all? The book Why They Do It: Inside the mind of the White-Collar Criminal based on a research by Eugene Soltes reveals a startling insight. Soltes spoke to fifty white collar criminals to understand their motivations behind the crimes. Like most of us, Soltes expected the workings of a calculated and greedy mind behind the crimes, something that could separate them from regular people. However, the results were surprisingly unnerving. According to the research, most of the executives who committed crimes made decisions the way we all do–on the basis of their intuitions and gut feelings. They often didn’t realise the consequences of their action and got caught in the flow of making more money.

Play

The arena of white collar crimes is full of commanding players with large and complex personalities. Billions, starring Damien Lewis and Paul Giamatti, captures the undercurrents of Wall Street and delivers a high-octane ‘ruthless attorney vs wealthy kingpin’ drama. The show looks at the fine line between success and fraud in the stock market. Bobby Axelrod, the hedge fund kingpin, skilfully walks on this fine line like a tightrope walker, making it difficult for Chuck Rhoades, a US attorney, to build a case against him.

If financial drama is your thing, then block your weekend for Billions. You can catch it on Hotstar Premium, a platform that offers a wide collection of popular and Emmy-winning shows such as Game of Thrones, Modern Family and This Is Us, in addition to live sports coverage, and movies. To subscribe, click here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of Hotstar and not by the Scroll editorial team.