Letters to the editor

Readers’ comments: ‘With Girija Devi’s demise, India has lost a national treasure’

A selection of readers’ opinions.

Last song

Girija Devi’s demise has deprived India of a national treasure (“Girija Devi (1929-2017): Banaras gharana singer renowned for her superlative thumri renditions”). She was not just a singer, but a repertoire of the rich tradition of Indian classical music. Most famed for her rendition of thumris, her performance of Nawab Wajid Ali Shah’s Babul Mora Naihar Chooto Hi Jaaye was a great example of her mastery. – KB Dessai

***

Her death is an irreparable loss for the music world. – Kajol Roy

Greatest rulers

Greatest of them all, really, sir? Akbar was one of the best rulers India has ever seen, no doubt (“Tipu Jayanti debate: Akbar is the hero India should really celebrate”). But I would like to underline that he was just one of the best and not greatest, especially when you are comparing him with someone like Shivaji. You won’t find someone as flawless as Shivaji. Being a Marathi, the author should have known better. Please read before you make such comments. I agree with we should celebrate Akbar for his many qualities, but sadly, in today’s political climate, this looks like a distant dream. I hope a day will come when we can freely celebrate human beings for their deeds irrespective of the political climate. – Nachiket Paralkar

***

Tipu Sultan could not have been a freedom fighter because the concept did not exist at the time. He was, like his contemporaries, a monarch fighting to defend his kingdom and allied with another European power to do so. Also, why the silence about Tipu’ s alleged atrocities in Kodagu and South Kanara? – Malati Das

Politics over protests

The National Green Tribunal’s order to shift the protest location from Jantar Mantar to Ramleela Maidan has come as a shock to many mass organisations and well-meaning personalities (“‘Not all can afford the price of justice’: How the Jantar Mantar ban has silenced protests in Delhi”). However the fact is that Jantar Mantar is no place for holding protest meetings. It is like rat hole, where not even 10,000 people can be absorbed. Yet, we find scores of protest meetings going on simultaneously, with just a few people in attendance in most case but with loud speakers at a the highest sound levels.

The speeches intersect each other and are therefore indecipherable, reducing the protest to a farce. Capitals the world over have large spaces for protest. In Kathmandu, 20 lakh people could gather to protest against King of Nepal and forced him to abdicate in favour of democratic set up. In Paris lakhs of people can gather but in Delhi, not even one lakh people can congregate in a single space. Instead of moving to Ramleela Maidan, Delhi should get the Boat Club lawns near India Gate and Parliament building back as a protest location, but I doubt a government intent on stifling dissent would allow that. – Chaman Lal

Tweaking history

As followers of Savarkar are in power, efforts are being made to change India (“An SC petition seeks to deny Savarkar’s role in Gandhi’s assassination. Here’s why it won’t be easy”). The government’s motives not clear. What’s being said publicly and what’s being propagated on the ground by RSS workers are very different. The government is tacitly supporting gau rakshak groups responsible for killing Muslims and Dalits. The propaganda line is that nothing was done under the Congress for 70 years but Modi is now bringing about vikas. To combat this, there is a need to come together. – Man Singh Tosaria

Taking charge

None of the leaders who lose elections ever take responsibility for the defeat and resign (“Akhilesh Yadav has beaten his father and uncle in the tug of war to control Samajwadi Party”). So why would Akhilesh Yadav be any different? All the leaders keep hanging on to the party posts. Some of them go on to win subsequent elections. Internal democracy and accountability are virtually non-existent in the political parties, barring the Communist parties. – Patrasurjyanarayan

Media freedom

I appreciate your right to freedom of speech (“Jay Amit Shah case: Court order against ‘The Wire’ raises questions about media freedom yet again”). Truth is bound to prevail. We must acknowledge the right thing and pay due regard to the founder of our Constitution, the ultimate purpose of which was to make our democratic processes the best. – Sewak Singh Ahuja

Indian pioneers

What this article states is one possible explanation (“Before S Chandrasekhar won the Nobel Prize in 1983, his theories were overlooked because of his race”). Another, told to me by Andrejz Trautman, a relativity theorist and a vice-president of the Polish Academy of Sciences, in 1980 or 81 , is that his work was of such a high standard (so demanding intellectually) that very few people could really understand it. Merit got him a job in Chicago; race kept his salary down, for decades. – Rathindra Nath Sen

Domestic violence debate

I agree there are some short comings in the system (“‘We can not write law’: Supreme Court wants to review its own order diluting domestic abuse law”). But one side cannot be penalised for this. Arrest is very derogatory and defamatory step and immediately closes the door to any kind of amicable resolution. And there are legal options for women, but no recourse for men. As times change, our laws need to change too. Without being convicted by the court, the husband and his family are declared criminals and sent to jail. This is not justice. Though court grants bail after arrest, it cannot reverse the humiliation that husband and his family members and relative have undergone.

In a majority of such cases, the families concerned boycott their sons. The law is meant to help women to peacefully regain their position back in the family, with her husband and in-laws, not to fulfill any malafide intention that will cause the family system to collapse.
I think the judgement needs to be refined further to to look at bogus complaints vs genuine ones. Only then can we say that it protects women. As is the case with men, all women are not perfect too. – Aashish Mishra

OROP row

It’s nice of the prime minister to spend Diwali with the Armed Forces (“Modi spends Diwali with jawans in Kashmir, says government is committed to OROP scheme”). However, his comment that OROP will be implemented raises questions of whether the recommendations on the anomalies of commission have been reviewed and the key demands of yearly revision of pension on a par with that of serving soldiers is being implemented. This requires clarification. – NRP Rao

Tata Mistry

Yes, it appeared to be a witch hunt and Cyrus Mistry was driven out in a very vindictive manner (“Cyrus Mistry’s ouster could have been handled in a better manner, says former Tata Sons official”). That is not the way to threat a senior executive of the organisation. This clearly shows the cultural downfall in the conglomerate after JRD Tata’s demise. – PD Amarnath

Starry eyed

Like any Aamir Khan movie, this film opened to high expectations from the audience (“Film review: ‘Secret Superstar’ hits the right notes but falls short of being super”). But what makes this film so different is that the superstar is not the star of this movie, he plays a supporting role of sorts. Perhaps the movie would have been better received if Aamir Khan had more screen time. It alsmost seemed as though he was there in the mobvie, but was fielding far away on the thrid-leg boundary with no catches coming his way.

I think after watching this film I walked away tad disappointed as an Aamir Khan fan, but also in awe of this actor for showing that he means business when it comes to filmmaking, even if it makes not taking the spotlight. – Hardik Vaidya

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.