Cow vigilantism

Rajasthan Muslim man was killed in gang shootout and not by cow vigilantes, police claim

Umar was part of a cattle smuggling gang while his attackers belong to a gang that extorts money from transporters on the pretext of cow protection, cops claim.

The killing of Muslim dairy farmer in Alwar on November 10 was the outcome of a “confrontation between two criminal groups”, the Rajasthan police said on Tuesday. While one group was involved in cattle smuggling, the police claimed, the other was into extortion on the pretext of cow protection.

The police came to this conclusion after interrogating Bhagwan Gujjar and Ramveer, who have been arrested on suspicion of being part of the group that killed the 35-year-old farmer named Umar. This, however, contradicts the police’s earlier claim that no shots were fired during the attack.

According to the First Information Report filed by the police, Umar and two other residents of Ghatmika village in the neighbouring Bharatpur district, Taahir and Javed, were transporting cows and calves Friday morning when their truck was flagged down by a group of seven-eight men near Govindnagar, Alwar. The men, who identified themselves as gau rakshaks, allegedly pulled out pistols and fired at the three farmers. While Javed escaped unhurt, Taahir sustained a bullet injury but managed to flee. Umar’s partially mutilated body was later found on railway tracks in Alwar’s Bilaspur area. The police believe this was a ploy by the attackers to make the murder look like an accident.

Bhagwan Gujjar and Ramveer have since disclosed that there was firing from both sides although no one from their group was injured, the police claimed.

“We have identified three more persons from the group but they are absconding,” said Alwar South Circle Officer Anil Beniwal. “They are all from Bharatpur district. Prima facie they are a gang pretending to be cow vigilantes to target transporters with the intent of extorting money.”

Picking up clues

When the police first found an abandoned vehicle, with calves and cows inside and one of the animals dead, on November 10, they registered a case under the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act, which prohibits cow slaughter. Only after Umar’s family identified his body, sparking protests by Muslim groups in the area, did the police register a case of murder, attempt to murder, rioting and causing disappearance of evidence against unknown persons on November 12.

The police said they are still verifying the criminal backgrounds of the two arrested men, but have already traced several cases of cattle smuggling, criminal assault and abduction to Umar and Taahir. They also said the truck ferrying the cattle was stolen and carries the registration number of a two-wheeler.

The police are now searching for Taahir and Javed. “It has become very important to question them to establish the exact sequence of events,” said Beniwal. “They have not told their families about their whereabouts and have constantly been changing their locations in Bharatpur and the neighbouring Mewat district in Haryana.”

According to the police, the arrested men have told them the incident actually occurred at a place in Bharatpur district and not Alwar. When the attackers realised Umar was dead, they drove his pickup truck to Govindnagar. There, they put Umar’s body in another vehicle and dumped it around 15 km away, on railway tracks.

Meanwhile, Umar’s relatives have so far refused to give permission for the postmortem, insisting that the police first arrest all those guilty of the murder. According to a report in Hindustan Times, they have also alleged that Taahir and Javed are “not giving the complete picture of the sequence of events” leading to Umar’s death.

Support our journalism by subscribing to Scroll+ here. We welcome your comments at letters@scroll.in.
Sponsored Content BY 

Do you really need to use that plastic straw?

The hazards of single-use plastic items, and what to use instead.

In June 2018, a distressed whale in Thailand made headlines around the world. After an autopsy it’s cause of death was determined to be more than 80 plastic bags it had ingested. The pictures caused great concern and brought into focus the urgency of the fight against single-use plastic. This term refers to use-and-throw plastic products that are designed for one-time use, such as takeaway spoons and forks, polythene bags styrofoam cups etc. In its report on single-use plastics, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) has described how single-use plastics have a far-reaching impact in the environment.

Dense quantity of plastic litter means sights such as the distressed whale in Thailand aren’t uncommon. Plastic products have been found in the airways and stomachs of hundreds of marine and land species. Plastic bags, especially, confuse turtles who mistake them for jellyfish - their food. They can even exacerbate health crises, such as a malarial outbreak, by clogging sewers and creating ideal conditions for vector-borne diseases to thrive. In 1988, poor drainage made worse by plastic clogging contributed to the devastating Bangladesh floods in which two-thirds of the country was submerged.

Plastic litter can, moreover, cause physiological harm. Burning plastic waste for cooking fuel and in open air pits releases harmful gases in the air, contributing to poor air quality especially in poorer countries where these practices are common. But plastic needn’t even be burned to cause physiological harm. The toxic chemical additives in the manufacturing process of plastics remain in animal tissue, which is then consumed by humans. These highly toxic and carcinogenic substances (benzene, styrene etc.) can cause damage to nervous systems, lungs and reproductive organs.

The European Commission recently released a list of top 10 single-use plastic items that it plans to ban in the near future. These items are ubiquitous as trash across the world’s beaches, even the pristine, seemingly untouched ones. Some of them, such as styrofoam cups, take up to a 1,000 years to photodegrade (the breakdown of substances by exposure to UV and infrared rays from sunlight), disintegrating into microplastics, another health hazard.

More than 60 countries have introduced levies and bans to discourage the use of single-use plastics. Morocco and Rwanda have emerged as inspiring success stories of such policies. Rwanda, in fact, is now among the cleanest countries on Earth. In India, Maharashtra became the 18th state to effect a ban on disposable plastic items in March 2018. Now India plans to replicate the decision on a national level, aiming to eliminate single-use plastics entirely by 2022. While government efforts are important to encourage industries to redesign their production methods, individuals too can take steps to minimise their consumption, and littering, of single-use plastics. Most of these actions are low on effort, but can cause a significant reduction in plastic waste in the environment, if the return of Olive Ridley turtles to a Mumbai beach are anything to go by.

To know more about the single-use plastics problem, visit Planet or Plastic portal, National Geographic’s multi-year effort to raise awareness about the global plastic trash crisis. From microplastics in cosmetics to haunting art on plastic pollution, Planet or Plastic is a comprehensive resource on the problem. You can take the pledge to reduce your use of single-use plastics, here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of National Geographic, and not by the Scroll editorial team.