The Daily Fix

The Daily Fix: By gagging the media in Sohrabuddin case, court is hurting the delivery of justice

Everything you need to know for the day (and a little more).

The Big Story: Gagging media

As early as in March 1950, the Supreme Court eloquently articulated the effect of prior restraints on speech and expression, calling it a danger to the “marketplace of ideas”. In his opinion in Brij Bhushan vs State of Delhi, Justice Patanjali Sastri quoted British jurist William Blackstone’s views on what prior restraint does to the very idea of freedom of press to drive home the court’s position.

“The liberty of the press consists in laying no previous restraint upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published. Every free man has an undoubted right to say what sentiments he pleases before the public; to forbid this, is to destroy the freedom of the press.”

However, this caution doesn’t seem to bother courts of today. Prior restraint, the tool with which the state stops a person from even exercising her freedom of expression, is starting to become so common that there is now a fear of this extreme tool turning into a normal procedure.

The latest example of such prior restraint took place in Mumbai on Wednesday, when the Central Bureau of Investigation court hearing the Sohrabuddin Sheikh encounter case, which once involved Bharatiya Janata Party president Amit Shah and senior police officers from Gujarat, gagged the media from reporting on the trial. Following the Caravan magazine’s recent investigation into the circumstances leading to the death of a judge hearing the case in December 2014, the defence team alleged prejudice in the manner in which the media was reporting the trial. If day-to-day reporting of evidences and testimonies was allowed, the lawyers alleged, the lives of the accused could be in danger. The court accepted the pleadings and stopped the media from writing on the case till further orders.

The ingenuity of this argument is startling. An imagined threat to the accused has been converted by the court into a real threat. Since the accused could not cite any incident of intimidation against them in the ongoing case, they chose to cite threats received by lawyers in the 2006 Malegaon blast case. How the two cases are related is unclear.

But this is not a unique case. Citing inaccurate representation of its comments, the Allahabad High Court on November 7 barred the media from reporting on the proceedings of the 2008 Gorakhpur hate speech case, in which Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath is the prime accused.

The role of the media in any criminal trial involving high-profile personalities is the role of a watchdog. While the accused may consider even a reference to the charges against them as prejudice, the constant eye of the media is a crucial part in ensuring that the balance of justice is maintained and any deviation from the procedures established by law is flagged. In essence, the media aides the delivery of justice.

It is for this reason that the Supreme Court in 2012 made it clear that any prior restraint on media could be imposed only when there is “a real and substantial risk of prejudice to fairness of the trial” and “when the salutary effects of such orders outweigh the deleterious effects to the free expression of those affected by the prior restraint”.

In both the cases, and many others in the recent past, the courts have clearly ignored this guideline.

The Big Scroll

  • Baba Ramdev book injunction pits freedom of speech against right to reputation. Which will prevail?  


  1. The decision to re-introduce the 2016 Bill on transgender rights makes a mockery of democratic norms, Namrata Mukherjee writes in The Hindu. 
  2. India and US must leverage defence technology and trade initiative for mutual benefit, says Benjamin Schwartz in the Hindustan Times. 
  3. Quality certification for generic medicines will increase their adoption and lower the overall expense on medicines, argues this editorial in the Mint. 


Don’t miss

In Chennai, thousands of dead fish wash up on shore of Adyar estuary.

“The two incidents in the space of three years have left fishermen in the village worried about the impact on their livelihoods. Palayam, president of the Ururkuppam Fishermen Cooperative Society, said he was particularly anguished to see several dead sand whiting fish, or kezhanga – an economically important variety that sells for Rs 30 to Rs 50 per fish. “It usually survives even in shallow water and moves with the current,” the 54-year-old said. “This is all because of the chemical water let out by industries in the river. This water has poison.” 

We welcome your comments at
Sponsored Content BY 

Changing the conversation around mental health in rural India

Insights that emerged from discussions around mental health at a village this World Mental Health Day.

Questioning is the art of learning. For an illness as debilitating as depression, asking the right questions is an important step in social acceptance and understanding. How do I open-up about my depression to my parents? Can meditation be counted as a treatment for depression? Should heartbreak be considered as a trigger for deep depression? These were some of the questions addressed by a panel consisting of the trustees and the founder of The Live Love Lough Foundation (TLLLF), a platform that seeks to champion the cause of mental health. The panel discussion was a part of an event organised by TLLLF to commemorate World Mental Health Day.

According to a National Mental Health Survey of India 2015-16, conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), common mental disorders including depression, anxiety disorders and substance use disorders affect nearly 10% of the population, with 1 in 20 people in India suffering from depression. The survey reported a huge treatment gap, a problem that is spread far and wide across urban and rural parts of the country.

On 10th of October, trustees of the foundation, Anna Chandy, Dr. Shyam Bhat and Nina Nair, along with its founder, Deepika Padukone, made a visit to a community health project centre in Devangere, Karnataka. The project, started by The Association of People with Disability (APD) in 2010, got a much-needed boost after partnering with TLLLF 2 years ago, helping them reach 819 people suffering from mental illnesses and spreading its program to 6 Taluks, making a difference at a larger scale.


During the visit, the TLLLF team met patients and their families to gain insights into the program’s effectiveness and impact. Basavaraja, a beneficiary of the program, spoke about the issues he faced because of his illness. He shared how people used to call him mad and would threaten to beat him up. Other patients expressed their difficulty in getting access to medical aid for which they had to travel to the next biggest city, Shivmoga which is about 2 hours away from Davangere. A marked difference from when TLLLF joined the project two years ago was the level of openness and awareness present amongst the villagers. Individuals and families were more expressive about their issues and challenges leading to a more evolved and helpful conversation.

The process of de-stigmatizing mental illnesses in a community and providing treatment to those who are suffering requires a strong nexus of partners to make progress in a holistic manner. Initially, getting different stakeholders together was difficult because of the lack of awareness and resources in the field of mental healthcare. But the project found its footing once it established a network of support from NIMHANS doctors who treated the patients at health camps, Primary Healthcare Centre doctors and the ASHA workers. On their visit, the TLLLF team along with APD and the project partners discussed the impact that was made by the program. Were beneficiaries able to access the free psychiatric drugs? Did the program help in reducing the distance patients had to travel to get treatment? During these discussions, the TLLLF team observed that even amongst the partners, there was an increased sense of support and responsiveness towards mental health aid.

The next leg of the visit took the TLLLF team to the village of Bilichodu where they met a support group that included 15 patients and caregivers. Ujjala Padukone, Deepika Padukone’s mother, being a caregiver herself, was also present in the discussion to share her experiences with the group and encouraged others to share their stories and concerns about their family members. While the discussion revolved around the importance of opening up and seeking help, the team brought about a forward-looking attitude within the group by discussing future possibilities in employment and livelihood options available for the patients.

As the TLLLF team honoured World Mental Health day, 2017 by visiting families, engaging with support groups and reviewing the successes and the challenges in rural mental healthcare, they noticed how the conversation, that was once difficult to start, now had characteristics of support, openness and a positive outlook towards the future. To continue this momentum, the organisation charted out the next steps that will further enrich the dialogue surrounding mental health, in both urban and rural areas. The steps include increasing research on mental health, enhancing the role of social media to drive awareness and decrease stigma and expanding their current programs. To know more, see here.

This article was produced by the Scroll marketing team on behalf of The Live Love Laugh Foundation and not by the Scroll editorial team.